for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Im with you on that baz, SEO have new people on board who are fresh and looking forward to a much bigger and more prosperous company for the good of themselves and SEOS share holders.

Well done, driver. Fine for a start. However, he looks almost pleasant and needs to be grimacing, as if with pain, but really because it is so obnoxious living with himself. The eyes are squiniting, which is OK, but it might be better if they bulged out sideways, so that he can see all his imaginary enemies stabbing him in the back. If his head was made of egg-shell, it would ensure an early demise as he falls off his wailing wall!

Eric

baza, well done, sir.your water is nigh on infallable.
i would like a few niggles cleared up by the more intelligent , please. firstly , it says that

"It was announced on 6 June 2005 that the Company had entered into a conditional
agreement to acquire the whole of the share capital of Biotec for a total
consideration of US$25 million."

"total consideration" is what i am focusing on.

but later it says,

"The Acquisition Agreement further provides for the assignment to Stanelco of
debts currently owed by Biotec to the Vendor amounting to approximately 16
million ('Vendor Indebtedness')."

does that mean seo pay 25millin euros and get the 16million euro debt as well, or is the debt included in the "total consideration" ?

also, i do like the idea of seo having the capacity to a)raise further funds quickly and b)to borrow more. their aquisitions have so far been excellent strategically and they seem to have a canny eye for spotting companies with great ip and technology, i.e. adept and aquasol. so far, seo have not let us down and have shown they can be trusted to deliver.

saying that , we could do with some more retro-fit orders, though.........

bos
Re "cleared up by the more intelligent" I won't bother then.

Christ bos. If you're after comments by the more intelligent you're gonna have to start a new thread!!

bos. I think ii is the guy you're looking for. ii stands for immensely (large head) intelligent. 'Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes and prudent in their own sight!' - that's his own book. We simple folk stick to the plain facts without having to distort them. Reckon that's a good way to tackle it. Now I've forgotten what you asked and we are on a new page. Never mind, it was probably a rhetorical question - better than ii's rhetorical answers, not even he can remember the qustion.

By the way, have you opened a new CFD on SEO. Think its a good time to do it. May have a week or so left at this sp level and then its history.

Eric

Thread created for The more intelligent.

https://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=8461#lastread

Hi All,

Lots of options, but I too am split between another aquistion, or Biotec big expansion, or Greenseal rapid rollout costs.

I think it's safe to say that the last two being the case, then Stanelco must have already received some massive interest in the products, for them to think they will NEED more money available at short notice :)

Borrowing cash is more like the second two options, as the revenue will quickly pay the money back. Placing sounds more like option one, as per Biotec and all the other aquisitions before it.

I said before, that someone had been discussing an idea with me, for a massive use of Biotec TPS, we chatted, he made a very good case up for the idea, and HQ and the prospective client are looking at it, and if it comes off, then a massive upgrade of TPS output will be needed to supply the end users requirements, that is a possiility for the cash too. Nothing guaranteed yet though !

Cheers,

PM

Apart from the resolutions to allow another 46M shares to be issued to dilute again and also the need to increase debt ability -


Did you get these two in the RNS yesterday ? -

1 - In particular Polyethylene ('PE') and Amorphous Polyethylene Terephthalate ('APET') sheet for making food trays is currently priced in the order of 1.70 per kilo, whilst the target price for Biotec's comparable materials will be priced in the region of
1.80 per kilo.

The real price on the market today for PE is 1.70 the TARGET price for Biotec is 1.80 yes its only a TARGET price and most likely will not be reached yet more SPIN imo sounds impressive though but they cannot even word the news realistic target to give it some more strength just say target whose target ? and why not give reference to the present market price per kilo for Biotecs or would it frighten people at the difference between hidden present and stated target ?

2 - The Acquisition Agreement further provides for the assignment to Stanelco of debts currently owed by Biotec to the Vendor amounting to approximately 16 million ('Vendor Indebtedness').

So now SEO has a nice 16 million Euro debt to hold and service so they are paying 25M US$ for hard gross assets of 2.8m making a net loss of 1.3M Euro with a debt of 16M Euro.


And this one from the RNS for joint venture 5th July -

Biotec is one of the world's leading exponents of starch technology and made a pre-tax profit of 0.1m in the year to 31st December 2004 and had gross assets of 2.8m at the year then ended


And this one from the RNS for the acquisition 6th June

At the last accounting reference date 31 December 2004 Biotec's Net Assets were EUR 6.1m and in the last financial year ended 31 December 2004 Biotec made a net loss of EUR1.3m.

Called into ASDA to check on Greenseal, could only find fish using the technology.
I noticed that it had a complete wrapt around similar to cling film, with a crimping
like seal, as against the normal heat sealed top cover.
My one impression was how Fresh the fish looked, and this was at 9pm.
So it would appears to do, what we are led to believe it would do.
cyril

shareshure
dont take any notice of premarket prices ( unless acc by rns ). didnt see the other explanation, but this sort of thing happens on most SETS stocks. often the bid is higher than the offer. its due to market makers not being online. what you are seeing is prices on the order book. there may be a punter with a buy or sell order for 18p for example. level2 can be a very good investment for those with the time and money.

Driver,
Love the new thread, but the title makes me wonder if anyone on here is qualified to post on it. The obvious exception is ii, who is so clever, he has created an entirely new language all for himself, where the words don't mean what they say, so if he posted on it we wouldn't understand it anyway.

Amazing - my post 8145 and you hide your head in the sand when the figures have been changed from net assets to GROSS assets - what is that all about - how can real nett assets be now less in terms of gross assets ?? Changing their mind on the figures - And the debt - oh dear - maybe explains the big selling - are these people ethical in the changes between RNSs and figures ?? Its a very valid question now.

Thread for the more intelligent.

https://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=8461#lastread

Superrod, thanks for the reassurance; I've gone ahead anyway with that purchase.
I am backing a hunch that next week, (Tuesday, who knows?) we may get another announcement re Wallmart; maybe not the signed up deal, but close on? Merely guessing on my part, although on my first two tranches after I bought news flowed within the week. Hope the luck continues.
I still haven't ruled out purchasing another two tranches, although I would be happier to see the supply of stock slowing. It was a bit unnerving to see the two fairly large end of day sells go through. I still view this as a 'one way ticket ' over a two year period which is the arbitrary timescale I've set for achieving a 10/20 bagger on SEO.
One query I have is if The Age Of Reason is supplying shares into the market by reducing its holding, would SEO be compelled to notify the LSE because of its family link with Howard White?

thank you ii for giving your opinion to my question. at least that's one point of view. i am still not convinced that it is correct. i was hoping for better answers as it is a very valid question. before we (shareholders) give our approval i think we should be told if the 16m euro debt is part of the 25m euro "total consideration" ?
great new thread, driver.!!!!!

Must confess ii that I will continue to put my head in the sand - because everytime I do = the price seems to go up - so here goes (grinding noise) - muffled effect for head now in the sand.

I will pop it up again in the next couple of weeks to see what has happened !!

Baza

Bosley, perhaps this answers your question:

From the RNS:

"Under the terms of the Disposal Agreement to be entered into in accordance with
the Heads of Terms, SP Metal will agree to acquire a 50 per cent. interest in
Biotec, including a 50 per cent. interest in the Vendor Indebtedness from
Stanelco."

If you aquire an interest in "indebtedness" I would assume this to mean that you are now the creditor and not the debtor. In other words, the Vendor has forgiven the loan.

If Stanelco really owed 8 million to the Vendor, I'm sure they would not have hidden it in lawyer language.