Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

PC & MAC CLINIC - On line problem solving. (CPU)     

Crocodile - 16 Dec 2002 03:59

skinny - 11 Dec 2009 09:04 - 8612 of 11003

Hils - I had a quick look last night at the Matrox Millennium G200 Quad - is that the one you mean? I was suprised to see that they only have 32mb memory - even my current card, which is 7 years old has 128mb - dual head radeon 9700.

Kayak - 11 Dec 2009 09:04 - 8613 of 11003

I now use an NVIDIA NVS 285 which is great (dual) but there are also the NVS 400/420/450 (quad). Better than the Matrox in my experience. I think it's newer technology.

In fact many high range NVIDIA cards are dual head.

Kayak - 11 Dec 2009 09:10 - 8614 of 11003

Cards like the Radeon 9700 (and current equivalents) are great for games etc (built for 3d) but are much more expensive. The Matrox and NVS ranges are meant for business systems so don't have the 3d technology. You won't need 128Mb for a few charts.

Seymour Clearly - 11 Dec 2009 09:17 - 8615 of 11003

I use 2 Matrox G450 DVI cards in different machines with that low amount of memory at work, one screen has my test chart on and the other is for my work, and they're fine - even running Metatrader in the background on one screen. There's no discernible delay on the displays.

Balerboy - 11 Dec 2009 09:21 - 8616 of 11003

Hi you tech, guy's & kayak if you can help,
The MAM charts I pasted into notebook and made a web page of have worked well yesterday, but they haven't all updated to todays charts. The year chart has moved on to todays date and show current sp pric, but the 2 day chart hasn't it still shows yesterday's finish sp. Can I change a bit of the HTML code to update daily? I've pasted a sample code for you to look at.

http://charts.moneyam.com/Chart.aspx?Provider=Intra&Code=RIO&Size=360&Skin=BlackBlue&Type=2&Scale=0&Start=20091209&End=20091211&Fix=1&MA=&EMA=&OVER=&IND=&XCycle=DAY1&XFormat=dd&Cycle=MINUTE2&Layout=Default;HisDate&SV=0&E=UK"/>

Kayak - 11 Dec 2009 09:23 - 8617 of 11003

Probably just a question of using ctrl-F5 balerboy?

Kayak - 11 Dec 2009 09:24 - 8618 of 11003

That having been said I see my NVS 285 is 256Mb.

BTW provided you have free slots you don't need a single quad card for four displays, you can have two dual cards too.

Balerboy - 11 Dec 2009 09:25 - 8619 of 11003

Refreshed page but didn't change 2 day chart, still on 10th chart.

Kayak - 11 Dec 2009 09:30 - 8620 of 11003

Ah actually that's because the 2 day chart has the start date in the link!

hilary - 11 Dec 2009 09:30 - 8621 of 11003

That is exactly the card I meant, skinners. I know they're probably outdated now as I mentioned yesterday, but for trading they're fine. I've been using mine for a good few years now without a problem and, like I say, they're cheap enough to be able to keep a spare one laying around in case of emergency. The only problem I've had is that one of my splitter cables has got a dickey connection inside somewhere.

Now, if you want to play the latest "Harry Potter does Jordan" PC game, you might need a faster, more modern card.

PS I don't know how many monitors your current card supports, but you could always use that.

PPS The legs on desk are extra.

skinny - 11 Dec 2009 09:35 - 8622 of 11003

Thanks all - Hils, I hear your words about 'fit for purpose' - my current card supports 2 monitors and I could always use that for "Debbie does Dallas" - BTW how much extra ? :-)

jeffmack - 14 Dec 2009 17:54 - 8623 of 11003

I have a laptop with Win Vista Home Premium 32bit. I intend to upgrade to Win 7 prof or ultimate. My question is, should I buy the 32 bit upgrade or go for the 64 bit that needs a clean install and go through the hassle of installing all my software again. Or does it not really matter between 32 bit and 64 bit.

Balerboy - 14 Dec 2009 18:23 - 8624 of 11003

Be sure that things like printer/scanner drivers support 64 bit if you change or are available. BB

Optimist - 14 Dec 2009 18:40 - 8625 of 11003

The main advantage of 64bit is that it can use more than 3.3GB RAM.

Most current programs are still 32 bit so you will get very little advantage for the time being. However, Installing Windows 7 is a good time to go for a clean install, so there is little downside to using 64 bit.

I have 64 bit Win 7 on my laptop and it works very well. IE8 seems better in 64 bit but Y-Refresher does not work on it so I tend to use the 32 bit version instead. The only other problems that I had, were the Send to OneNote 2007 printer, an 8 year old HP printer and OpenVPN client. All of which are solvable but complicated.

IMO, it is worth putting Ultimate on a laptop, if only for the system backup, Bitlocker and Bitlocker to Go.

BTW, a couple of months ago, Kayak mentioned on this thread that Win 7 Ultimate keys can be bought on Ebay for $25. They are still availible, and so far they still work.

ExecLine - 14 Dec 2009 19:53 - 8626 of 11003

Ok, Opti....but I'm a bit thick...

So I buy the key for either a 64 or 32 bit Windows 7 Ultimate Version Retail License from say, somewhere on Ebay like THIS

As I understand it, what I'm actually buying is a 'Number or Serial Code Key'. This will then allow me to Pass Microsoft Serial Key Genuine Validation.

The key download appears to be one heck of a massive piece of software. It's so big that one needs a special software downloader to handle the download (eg, "BT" (????), "emule", "flashget"). What is this software? Is it actually Windows 7 Ultimate?

Anyhow, I'm a bit confused. You say it can be done. Do you recommend I do it?

I guess I could create a folder and put it in that and then burn it onto a disc and call it Window 7 Ultimate ($25 Ebay version).

Is my question so daft that you would automatically say 'No'?

Hmmm?

Optimist - 14 Dec 2009 21:30 - 8627 of 11003

Doc

Yes that link is to the key though that seller has only one sale to his name.

Most of the keys being sold are for the key only, no software is included although some will give you a download link. I understand that the keys are suposed to have been issued to MSDN members who don't need them.

The key is for either 32 or 64 bit but can only be used on one machine. You would need to download the ISO and burn it to a DVD. The download is only 2 to 3 GB so it can be done overnight. The problem is to find a trustable download you would do best to find someone who has a genuine Microsoft disc and take a copy of it. That way, you know that you have a safe OS and your only risk is whether or not the key expires.

jeffmack - 14 Dec 2009 21:46 - 8628 of 11003

Does anyone have a genuine Win7 disc they can copy for me?

jeffmack - 15 Dec 2009 16:16 - 8629 of 11003

Hi Opto
If I do a clean install of the 64bit version, do I need to do something to my laptop first. Or when I install Win7 64 bit will it do it all for me.

Do you know a good site to download the full version.

Optimist - 15 Dec 2009 16:59 - 8630 of 11003

So long as you have a 64 bit proccessor and your screen and network devices etc are supported then the install is straight forward although it will format the disk.

Microsoft have all the OS disk images on line but I think you have to be an MSDN member to get most of them. If you Bing for other sources then you will find them, but knowing whether or not they are safe is the problem. The onlly safe way is to check the MD5 sum.

jeffmack - 16 Dec 2009 16:31 - 8631 of 11003

Thks Opto

Bought a key for Win7 ultimate on ebay for about 20 and downloaded the program and all up and running. Seems ok, just loading on my software, no probs so far.
Register now or login to post to this thread.