I bought shares in this company at 4.5p in September 2003. I see they are rising. Can anyone tell me please the growth potential for this company as they have just been awarded several new contracts ?

very good question 'happy to watch'. And there are no more delays trades. I believe all the price nav has beed soaked up by the news. We really need to get excellent news and fast!! or else this will sink. In the medium to long term this share has potential though, providing growth of world economies keeps up. thanks

,

SUE HAS MIS LEAD PEOPLE ON THIS BOARD!!!



HEY, SHE WAS WRONG INSTEAD OF 3 NEWS CONTRACTS SHE SAID LAST WEEK "TWO CONTRACTS SHOULD ARRIVE SOON."



Sue has done a good work. I don't know how she did it, but she was very sure that new regarding new contract would be released soo. Respect, or are you working for CWV?!

If anyone loses money as a result of Sue's comments it's their own fault. DYOR DYOR DYOR. Trust no one on BB's.

Amazing how people will buy just on a thread. If any person gives a view on a price it's THEIR view, hence the reason we have to do our own research. If people have bought just because Sue said it will reach 50p then that is just silly. She has given an estimate based on her research.

Short term - price has to establish a new support level, without news of the placing this is gone swing between 10 - 13p. T10ers good luck!

Long Term - no estimates!! :) But fundamentals are good, company is growing and hence a good long term buy.

DYOR!!! and stop blaming others.

I posted this selection elsewhere today....as a bit of afternoon fun in a SPOT THE DIFFERENCE competition...as some of these boards have in my view got distracted from the bigger picture....so come on all you pro and anti CWV people...WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE ??

It's not too difficult really !!

OK.. I'll give you another tip just to help a little...think about this as if you were a director and major shareholder in CWV sitting down with their advisors...Corporate Synergy !!

ZOO
Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE ratio ..Mkt Cap (m)
1.882 ......-2.34........ -1.46....... -8.048...... 26.35

YOO
Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE ratio ..Mkt Cap (m)
0.039 ...... -7.038..... -9.17....... -3.544...... 36.62

CYH
Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE ratio ..Mkt Cap (m)
5.066 ...... -0.787..... -0.1....... -29.25....... 28.82

NPG
Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE ratio ..Mkt Cap (m)
0.954 ...... -3.465..... -5.03....... -3.479....... 20.54

AFN
Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE ratio.. Mkt Cap (m)
2.264...... -1.218 .....-0.26........ -12.885....... 13.61

PTS
Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE ratio.. Mkt Cap (m)
7.787....... -9.061..... -7.0....... -2.571........ 23.68

FBT
Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE ratio.. Mkt Cap (m)
0.009....... -0.431..... 0.0 ........0.0......... 32.71


And finally....

CWV
Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE ratio ..Mkt Cap (m)
1.206 ....... -0.683.......-1.11.... -11.036......6.74

Sorry but I dont agree

Sue has done good work on this board and I am still holding my shares. It is always the same when a share drops the blame people come out becuse they have lost money without DYOR. The only one you can blame is yourselves. But if you DYOR you will see the potential in this share and future growth.

So dont forget blame YOURSELVES because it was you and only you that brought, non of us made you, but if you hold on to yourshares you will see a good profit.

M.C.

http://t/cwv.htm

Hello All,

The company is making progress as you can se in my research. Companies are measure for ther capabilities ans this one has it. Remeember this is a tiny company which has survive during the 2000's early depresion and will do better this time. Sue well done for your research. I hope this helps. You have to copy ans paste this into a spreadsheet to make more sense. thanks.

Historical Reports for CMS Webview PLC
Annual, Consolidated Report
Results from 31Dec98 to 31Dec02

31-Dec-02 31-Dec-01 31-Dec-00 31-Dec-99 31-Dec-98
(GBP) (GBP) (GBP) (GBP) (GBP)
12Months 12Months 12Months 12Months 6Months
Audited Prelim Audited Audited Audited

Revenue 1206000 1119000 1299000 43000 70000
Operating Costs 2206000 2112000 1255000 37000 61000
~Depreciation - - 21000 0 0
~Total Staff Costs - - 623000 - -
Operating Result -733000 -993000 44000 6000 9000
Net Int Exp/(Inc) -50000 -113000 -78000 -180000 -203000
Interest Payable - 0 0 0 0
Interest Receivable 50000 113000 78000 180000 203000
Pretax Profit/Loss -683000 -880000 122000 186000 212000
Tax -70000 0 36000 1000 20000
Net Profit/Loss - -880000 - - -
Preference Dividends 0 0 0 0 0
Net Attributable -613000 -880000 86000 185000 192000
Common Stk Dividends 0 - 0 0 0
Retained Profit/Loss - -880000 - - -
Total Current Assets 1382000 2120000 2961000 12000 10000
~Cash & Equivalents 1102000 1893000 2699000 12000 4000
~Receivables 280000 227000 262000 0 6000
~Inventories 0 0 0 0 0
Fixed Assets 164000 156000 119000 134000 134000
Total Assets 1546000 2276000 3080000 146000 144000
Total Liabilities 444000 561000 485000 6000 9000
~Current Liabilities 444000 561000 485000 6000 9000
~Long Term Debt 0 0 0 0 0
~Deferred Liabilities 0 0 0 0 0
Minority Interests - 0 0 0 0
Shareholders' Equity - 1715000 2595000 140000 135000
Preferred Stock 0 0 0 0 0

i think this board for people discuss not argue.

I suggest that people with research facts are allow to participate. Lets squelch the useless ones.

Sue.

Sue.

We have seen the bottom today and tomorrow should be a strong blue day.

Keep the faith.

Best Wishes,

Sue.

I have made a great profit on this stock. Bought at 6p, sold at 10p. Nearly doubled my money, delighted with that. Am lookin forward to a bumper Christmas!

As for recent fall, I dont blame anyone at all. My sentiments I think are clear in that I feel the rampers have been totally disingenuous.

I totally agree that stocks without profits can climb to dizzy heights on very little news.

My point to followers of this board is that, this stock and stocks like it are difficult to value as investments. They certainly cant be quantified the way some have tried to and at ridiculously high P/E ratios they offer new investors no margin of safety whatsoever.

I bet anyone who bought in at 18pence is pretty pi**ed off!

Let me be positive on what growth there is here. I will buy back in if the stock drifts to 9-10pence. Otherwise I will wait for more info, even if that means missing some gains in the interim.

First rule of investing - dont lose money.
Second rule, dont forget first!!

Personnally i can't see them below 10p, more likely to trade near 5-10% discount price of mid 28 Nov. & with any positive news more likely to reach 20p as I can't see institutes investing if no upside forethcoming. Can anybody see a bigger discount??

Nop dipys100.

The chart still looks good for CWV, IMHO, still well off the lower trend line and the high RSI (20 day) in the upper sixties was indicating a retrace but no real danger signs in the chart at all. Looks like it might have settled today at the levels but in my humble opinion this will progress upwards over the next few days and weeks and has not actually been 'in trouble' at all.

Best Wishes,

Sue.

Charts since Share Mag tip dont give a good reflection, except perhaps for day traders, and even those are risky given the spreads and decreasing volumes.

The 50 day moving average is around 7 pence, the 200 day which shows longer term trend is around 3.5 pence!

The market is the collective buying and selling conscience of all investors. It is currently saying investors are unsure of the discount to be offered in a placement and the effect any dilution will have on future earnings per share.

I accept this is a growth stock in growing markets and I will buy for longer term at the right price,

BUT:-

I would be interested in hearing views of longer term players, who have a realistic view of the revenues available to CMS given the monetary size of contracts, which up to now dont amount to huge amounts of dosh.

What are the barriers to entry for any competitors who could enter the market?

How long would other players take to develop similar technology? Could banks or investment houses offer the products?

Any investors out there interested in these issues?

This company has a great potential no doubt of that, yes it could be other competitors which may bring same technology or even better one, in this competitive enviromental companies tend to upgrade their technolgies. CWS will be ready to upgrade too. Another good point is that is not expensive which makes it attractive companies who are ready to cost cuts. futhermore, it is an attractive buy for bigger companies, eg reuters, thompson or bloomberg. This stock should be seen as a medium to long term buy, lets all remember that.