Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


ptholden - 06 Sep 2005 17:33 - 8930 of 27111

Unfortunately with ADVFN crashing today, and the influx of their posters, all the old arguments with regard to the BPRG CC are resurrected. I was certainly of the opinion following the initial court ruling that the case would do SEO significant damage (my comments are in this thread somewhere) but now it is a complete red herring and nothing more than a distraction to the SEO management. BPRG 'supporters' should move on and stop grasping at straws for what has been a disastrous investment for many. SEO is moving into a different league.

pth

halfamil - 06 Sep 2005 17:41 - 8931 of 27111

Niggsy and Shamona. Sent you back to the ether where you both say you live. Don't waste your breath any more.

paulmasterson1 - 06 Sep 2005 17:47 - 8932 of 27111


Hi All,

Been having fun with the bashers from the dark side I see :))))

Good job the dark side is working again now, we don't need their kind of drivel and abuse on here.

Cheers,
PM

greekman - 06 Sep 2005 18:33 - 8933 of 27111

So the Judge stated in the SEO, BPRG court case summing up that a capsule could be classed as any type of small container. Not wishing to re-ignite the court case argument but please see things sensibly. A capsule could be classed as any type of small container....When a capsule is mentioned we tend to think quite rightly of something of the size you can swallow or of a size that contained something that itself can be swallowed. Would anyone class a ready meal container as a capsule. Also the technology is slightly different hence the patent argument not affecting greenseal . Anyone attempted to swallow a film sealed ready meal? ( yes I know that astronauts travel in capsules, thought i would get that one in before anyone else ).

EWRobson - 06 Sep 2005 19:31 - 8934 of 27111

Well done greekman. lol! I imagine these invaders coming from outer space in their capsules and swallowing themselves! Reminds me of insiderinside!

Eric

shamona - 06 Sep 2005 19:43 - 8935 of 27111

Dormar

Your knowledge of the court case is somewhat lacking, Stanelco have been found in breach of confidence; this is NOT being appealed.

What is being appealed is Stanelco's poor prior art being refused by the Judge, a 1950's handbook with references to sealing fertiliser bags was quite rightly rejected as too abscure to count as prior art.

As for only direct losses being awarded as damages!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm still laughing with that point of yours, lost business is what counts my friend nothing else. If I were a taxi driver and you stole my cab by your reckoning i'd lose nothing, simply staggering.

You also claim Patent family 1 is of no use without the other patents, this is quite correct but the other patents were classed as existing which means neither Stanelco or Bioprogress could claim ownership but both can use them(ie the rotating heads).

Remember Judge Floyd has already told Bioprogress to compile their damages claim so it's not going to go away.

greekman

It matters not what you or me think, the Judge has given his verdict regarding what is a capsule; any small container was his reply. Now I would class a food container as small wouldn't you? Worth noting that after the hassle this stolen patent has caused Bioprogress they may just throw a spanner in the works to delay Greenseal, it's been delayed in signing Wyeth and Cardinal so why not contest the food packaging patents as well.

In short Stanelco will have to pay large costs, huge damages and perhaps face lawsuits from Cardinal over Ingel and Bioprogress over Greenseal.







shamona - 06 Sep 2005 19:57 - 8936 of 27111

ptholden

Bioprogress is far from a disastrous investment as you put it, Nrobe commercialization will happen in less than six months, check out http://www.fmcmagenta.com/ for details.

It may have underperformed over the last year but as an investment it is very much a going concern, the fact it's vastly undervalued should actually be viewed as good news by retail punters like us; plenty of time to get on board.

Its valued at less than a quarter the value of Stanelco but is likely to make a profit before the latter, I know where i'd rather have my money.

As an anology, Bioprogress have ran 26 miles of a marathon and are in the finishing straight, they're in better shape than they were when they started and have the pot of gold in sight, multi billion dollar company or tired dud? Ask FMC, PERRIGO, AXM PHARMA, BOOTS etc etc etc.........

Cantlose - 06 Sep 2005 20:04 - 8937 of 27111

Shamona

...........sounds like some dreadful 80's vampire sound bite...........

Stanelco have mothballed the subsidiary company that was involved in the disputed patent case.

A food container small ? Discuss?

As a capsule is @ 250 times smaller(depending on the capsule) than a food container I would consider that a learned Judge would conclude that a food container is indeed large!

Damages if awarded won't be relevant against a dormant subsidiary company ........surely.

As another 80's band would say...........

.........You are clutching at straws!

bosley - 06 Sep 2005 20:19 - 8938 of 27111

ii, come back!!!!! all is forgiven!!!!! shamona, that has to be the quote of the century,

"shamona - 06 Sep 2005 19:57 - 8936 of 8937
ptholden

Bioprogress is far from a disastrous investment as you put it, "

and then to say

"As an anology, Bioprogress have ran 26 miles of a marathon and are ..."

i would agree that bprg have ran part of a marathon, up the hill and then way back down, but i see bprg as paula radcliffe last summer, shorts down, at the side of the road taking a shit!

bosley - 06 Sep 2005 20:21 - 8939 of 27111

sorry , i just couldn't let it lie.......

shamona - 06 Sep 2005 20:30 - 8940 of 27111

Cantlose

Bioprogress have been knocked back years by Stanelco stealing the patent, damages will be substancial.

20 million is the conservative estimate at the moment but it could be higher.

Wyeth alone are not singing till the cc is over, this on it's own is costing BPRG millions in delays; not to mention some staff being made redundant as a result of Stanelco's actions. Add in Cardinal and loss of competitor advantage etc etc....

Breach of confidence in a multi billion pound industry is treated very seriously in case you weren't aware.

bosley

After 8 years of development Bioprogress are a few months from Nrobe commercialization with FMC Bioploymer which is a billion dollar company, my analogy stands.

Cantlose - 06 Sep 2005 20:31 - 8941 of 27111

Bosley

Bad anology

Thought Paula won the London marathon!

Athens anology more appropriate...

Couldnt cope with the heat & didnt finish the race!

bristlelad - 06 Sep 2005 20:36 - 8942 of 27111

hi cantlose and the other dif ticks how much money have you lost must be?

andysmith - 06 Sep 2005 21:22 - 8943 of 27111

So the lights are out on ADVFN and we get an influx of dickheads spouting on about the BPRG cc in the vain hope that they might get some damages to negate the millions wasted and lost by their company with future profits nowhere in sight.
Wake up losers, you thought SEO were dead and buried last year and were topping up your holdings at >100p 'cos it will be 300p by Christmas, yeah, right oh.
That'll teach you to count your chickens before they've hatched from their little capsules that you can't make before they eventually get packed in RF sealed BIG capsules called food trays made one day made from Starpol and available in a supermarket near you. On the subject of recycling, don't forget to recycle your BPRG share certificates when they're worth Foxtrot Alpha. The lights are back on now at ADVFN so please run along now, take your straws to bed with you, clutching them tightly and dream on!!

.

andysmith - 06 Sep 2005 21:29 - 8944 of 27111

The above post is aimed at idiots who infiltrate other threads with garbage when they are bored and not the decent BPRG investors who are either sitting on paper losses or have taken them following last years hype.
Lets hope SEO doesn't go the same way but I believe that what they are striving to achieve could change some packaging concepts and by working with the retailers it is more likely to happen.

ptholden - 06 Sep 2005 21:42 - 8945 of 27111

Cantlose

Paula did win the London Marathon, but had to stop on route for a call of nature in a roadside drain. So actually it was quite a good analogy.

Bos

Cracking comment, just about popped a rib!! LoL :-))

Shamoaner

Try telling all those BPRG punters who bought in at 130p that it hasn't been a disastrous investment. All hpye, and eventually proven, no substance. Now as Andy Smith says, please run along back to ADVFN with the rest of the rampers and bashers, there's a good little boy (girl?).

pth

shamona - 06 Sep 2005 21:43 - 8946 of 27111

Andy

Is debating the court case a closed subject here?

Strange when one considers it could have a massive bearing on the future of this company.

Sorry for posting facts, i'll try to refrain again till judgement day.

andysmith - 06 Sep 2005 21:48 - 8947 of 27111

Shamona, debating the court case is one thing, the tone on here today was the same old taunts from last Autumn and look where that has got BPRG folk, 130p to 30p versus SEO. So to use court language, I put it to you that SEO will prove to be a more worthy investment and that any award to BPRG will be very small.
We hope to rest our case in the very near future. Dismissed.

shamona - 06 Sep 2005 21:48 - 8948 of 27111

pt

Its only a loss when one sells, same as any gains; not worth anything till their sold.

ps I'd keep the latter in mind if I were you.

pps Its not a football team we're discussing here, rather an investment which one should not get emotional over; try to cut back on the personal stuff, it seems to be a trait of mastersons which is beginning to affect others. I've been playing the markets for 30 years and this type of stuff only started happening 2 years ago, it really is sad that like minded individuals can't debate without abusing.

bosley - 06 Sep 2005 21:50 - 8949 of 27111

shamona, the cc isn't a closed subject. it's just terminally dull and boring because it's all been said a million times before. you, me , and everyone else has no frigging idea what the damages, if any , will be. therefore, seeing as all has been said before, don't you think it is wise to wait until judgement day ? then let the fun commence. but until then.........
Register now or login to post to this thread.