bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
EWRobson
- 06 Sep 2005 19:31
- 8934 of 27111
Well done greekman. lol! I imagine these invaders coming from outer space in their capsules and swallowing themselves! Reminds me of insiderinside!
Eric
shamona
- 06 Sep 2005 19:43
- 8935 of 27111
Dormar
Your knowledge of the court case is somewhat lacking, Stanelco have been found in breach of confidence; this is NOT being appealed.
What is being appealed is Stanelco's poor prior art being refused by the Judge, a 1950's handbook with references to sealing fertiliser bags was quite rightly rejected as too abscure to count as prior art.
As for only direct losses being awarded as damages!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm still laughing with that point of yours, lost business is what counts my friend nothing else. If I were a taxi driver and you stole my cab by your reckoning i'd lose nothing, simply staggering.
You also claim Patent family 1 is of no use without the other patents, this is quite correct but the other patents were classed as existing which means neither Stanelco or Bioprogress could claim ownership but both can use them(ie the rotating heads).
Remember Judge Floyd has already told Bioprogress to compile their damages claim so it's not going to go away.
greekman
It matters not what you or me think, the Judge has given his verdict regarding what is a capsule; any small container was his reply. Now I would class a food container as small wouldn't you? Worth noting that after the hassle this stolen patent has caused Bioprogress they may just throw a spanner in the works to delay Greenseal, it's been delayed in signing Wyeth and Cardinal so why not contest the food packaging patents as well.
In short Stanelco will have to pay large costs, huge damages and perhaps face lawsuits from Cardinal over Ingel and Bioprogress over Greenseal.
shamona
- 06 Sep 2005 19:57
- 8936 of 27111
ptholden
Bioprogress is far from a disastrous investment as you put it, Nrobe commercialization will happen in less than six months, check out http://www.fmcmagenta.com/ for details.
It may have underperformed over the last year but as an investment it is very much a going concern, the fact it's vastly undervalued should actually be viewed as good news by retail punters like us; plenty of time to get on board.
Its valued at less than a quarter the value of Stanelco but is likely to make a profit before the latter, I know where i'd rather have my money.
As an anology, Bioprogress have ran 26 miles of a marathon and are in the finishing straight, they're in better shape than they were when they started and have the pot of gold in sight, multi billion dollar company or tired dud? Ask FMC, PERRIGO, AXM PHARMA, BOOTS etc etc etc.........
Cantlose
- 06 Sep 2005 20:04
- 8937 of 27111
Shamona
...........sounds like some dreadful 80's vampire sound bite...........
Stanelco have mothballed the subsidiary company that was involved in the disputed patent case.
A food container small ? Discuss?
As a capsule is @ 250 times smaller(depending on the capsule) than a food container I would consider that a learned Judge would conclude that a food container is indeed large!
Damages if awarded won't be relevant against a dormant subsidiary company ........surely.
As another 80's band would say...........
.........You are clutching at straws!
bosley
- 06 Sep 2005 20:19
- 8938 of 27111
ii, come back!!!!! all is forgiven!!!!! shamona, that has to be the quote of the century,
"shamona - 06 Sep 2005 19:57 - 8936 of 8937
ptholden
Bioprogress is far from a disastrous investment as you put it, "
and then to say
"As an anology, Bioprogress have ran 26 miles of a marathon and are ..."
i would agree that bprg have ran part of a marathon, up the hill and then way back down, but i see bprg as paula radcliffe last summer, shorts down, at the side of the road taking a shit!
bosley
- 06 Sep 2005 20:21
- 8939 of 27111
sorry , i just couldn't let it lie.......
shamona
- 06 Sep 2005 20:30
- 8940 of 27111
Cantlose
Bioprogress have been knocked back years by Stanelco stealing the patent, damages will be substancial.
20 million is the conservative estimate at the moment but it could be higher.
Wyeth alone are not singing till the cc is over, this on it's own is costing BPRG millions in delays; not to mention some staff being made redundant as a result of Stanelco's actions. Add in Cardinal and loss of competitor advantage etc etc....
Breach of confidence in a multi billion pound industry is treated very seriously in case you weren't aware.
bosley
After 8 years of development Bioprogress are a few months from Nrobe commercialization with FMC Bioploymer which is a billion dollar company, my analogy stands.
Cantlose
- 06 Sep 2005 20:31
- 8941 of 27111
Bosley
Bad anology
Thought Paula won the London marathon!
Athens anology more appropriate...
Couldnt cope with the heat & didnt finish the race!
bristlelad
- 06 Sep 2005 20:36
- 8942 of 27111
hi cantlose and the other dif ticks how much money have you lost must be?
andysmith
- 06 Sep 2005 21:22
- 8943 of 27111
So the lights are out on ADVFN and we get an influx of dickheads spouting on about the BPRG cc in the vain hope that they might get some damages to negate the millions wasted and lost by their company with future profits nowhere in sight.
Wake up losers, you thought SEO were dead and buried last year and were topping up your holdings at >100p 'cos it will be 300p by Christmas, yeah, right oh.
That'll teach you to count your chickens before they've hatched from their little capsules that you can't make before they eventually get packed in RF sealed BIG capsules called food trays made one day made from Starpol and available in a supermarket near you. On the subject of recycling, don't forget to recycle your BPRG share certificates when they're worth Foxtrot Alpha. The lights are back on now at ADVFN so please run along now, take your straws to bed with you, clutching them tightly and dream on!!
.
andysmith
- 06 Sep 2005 21:29
- 8944 of 27111
The above post is aimed at idiots who infiltrate other threads with garbage when they are bored and not the decent BPRG investors who are either sitting on paper losses or have taken them following last years hype.
Lets hope SEO doesn't go the same way but I believe that what they are striving to achieve could change some packaging concepts and by working with the retailers it is more likely to happen.
ptholden
- 06 Sep 2005 21:42
- 8945 of 27111
Cantlose
Paula did win the London Marathon, but had to stop on route for a call of nature in a roadside drain. So actually it was quite a good analogy.
Bos
Cracking comment, just about popped a rib!! LoL :-))
Shamoaner
Try telling all those BPRG punters who bought in at 130p that it hasn't been a disastrous investment. All hpye, and eventually proven, no substance. Now as Andy Smith says, please run along back to ADVFN with the rest of the rampers and bashers, there's a good little boy (girl?).
pth
shamona
- 06 Sep 2005 21:43
- 8946 of 27111
Andy
Is debating the court case a closed subject here?
Strange when one considers it could have a massive bearing on the future of this company.
Sorry for posting facts, i'll try to refrain again till judgement day.
andysmith
- 06 Sep 2005 21:48
- 8947 of 27111
Shamona, debating the court case is one thing, the tone on here today was the same old taunts from last Autumn and look where that has got BPRG folk, 130p to 30p versus SEO. So to use court language, I put it to you that SEO will prove to be a more worthy investment and that any award to BPRG will be very small.
We hope to rest our case in the very near future. Dismissed.
shamona
- 06 Sep 2005 21:48
- 8948 of 27111
pt
Its only a loss when one sells, same as any gains; not worth anything till their sold.
ps I'd keep the latter in mind if I were you.
pps Its not a football team we're discussing here, rather an investment which one should not get emotional over; try to cut back on the personal stuff, it seems to be a trait of mastersons which is beginning to affect others. I've been playing the markets for 30 years and this type of stuff only started happening 2 years ago, it really is sad that like minded individuals can't debate without abusing.
bosley
- 06 Sep 2005 21:50
- 8949 of 27111
shamona, the cc isn't a closed subject. it's just terminally dull and boring because it's all been said a million times before. you, me , and everyone else has no frigging idea what the damages, if any , will be. therefore, seeing as all has been said before, don't you think it is wise to wait until judgement day ? then let the fun commence. but until then.........
paulmasterson1
- 07 Sep 2005 00:21
- 8950 of 27111
bristlelad I know a poem about you ....
Bristol born
Bristol bred
Thick in the arm
And thick in the head
:)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Join the other thicko's ....
Users you currently have squelched
Haystack
Dil
Scripophilist
Sequestor
bristlelad
Niggsy
insiderinside
Charles1952
shamona
stockdog
- 07 Sep 2005 00:21
- 8951 of 27111
shameonyer - I agree it's better not to get emotional over investments - your tone also saddens me. By the way it's much safer to assume a profit's not a profit till it's taken, but a loss is a loss is a loss whether on paper or crystalised.
I suggest you just keep swallowing the capsules, bitter pills though they may be.
I know an old lady who swallowed a food tray,
I don't know a good way to swallow a food tray
She swallowed the food tray to catch the tray lid (I'm telling you she did!)
She swallowed the tray lid to catch the salad bag (such a mad hag)
She swallowed the salad bag to catch the capsule
etc. etc
Mondini and Stanelco (from the Traylidiers)
woof woof
sd
paulmasterson1
- 07 Sep 2005 00:29
- 8952 of 27111
There was an old man, senile and seedy
He ran a company called bprg
Everyone knew him as Barry
But now he's happy as Larry
'Cos he took all the cash
Then made a dash
And left everyone holding the baby
:))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
shamona
- 07 Sep 2005 08:14
- 8953 of 27111
There was a big liar called masterson
I punched him in the face and he died