Stan
- 24 Sep 2018 10:31
- 12 of 55
But doesn’t that mean you have to be working first?... blow that 😄
CC
- 24 Sep 2018 14:26
- 13 of 55
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-45626043
10% of every company with more than 250 employees to be owned by employees/government if labour get in
Fred1new
- 24 Sep 2018 15:27
- 15 of 55
Depending on rules, regulations and method of introduction could lead to an improvement in working conditions and efficiency,
CC
- 24 Sep 2018 15:50
- 16 of 55
Surely it's impossible to implement?
Say I own a company with a turnover of £100m and employing 250 people.
Will I not just put the shares into Trust and take it off-shore?
Stan
- 24 Sep 2018 17:34
- 17 of 55
CC If any employer or individual takes any earnings from “this Country off-shore” then I hope they get duly hammered tax wise in some other area...no one likes a cheat.
Fred1new
- 24 Sep 2018 17:39
- 18 of 55
Don't know.
I can see some of the difficulties.
But similar arrangements for employees, management and "owners" have been working in Germany post WW2 and USA.
Also, similar ideas have applied to some very large companies in this country.
The major problem would seem to be ownership of the "workers' shares" ans who is entitled to "value" and "payouts" from that pot.
Also, perhaps "voting" power and direction of "management-
=-
Perhaps, this would be better on "The Talk to yourself Thread".
PS I hope Gofdfinger is well.
Still miss his contributions.
CC
- 26 Sep 2018 13:38
- 28 of 55
This time yesterday FTSE was up about 50 and every single stock in my portfolio was down or flat.
Today I'm sitting here with FTSE down 5 and nearly everything is up or flat.
All of which tells me I don't have a balanced portfolio!