It is pretty apparent that most of the "news" on the front page consists of very little more than a hasty rewrite of a regulatory announcement or a company press release, with a leavening of "Top stock edge higher/lower".

I have to say that I find this of very limited use - does anyone else see any value in it? If there was actually some analysis of the news it would be a good resource, but I don't see that the current regurgitation adds any value.

zz: The sub is only a few quid a month . . . I think it's worth it.

I understand your comment about the news content, but it's not all a regurgitation of RNS -- Kam Patel has done an excellent job and "Max Planck" is a composite of Shares journalists.

Also -- we're new -- this has been running live just three months -- and now we're about to introduce a great wireless service to phones and PDAs -- sorry, subscription only.

C'mon, part with a few bob.

Cheers

Derek (IST and MoneyAM)