bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
driver
- 11 Sep 2005 16:49
- 9136 of 27111
Niggsy
- 11 Sep 2005 16:59
- 9137 of 27111
I am VERY surprised that ASDA have allowed a relatively junior manager to make such a public statement - or did they ?
"Tony Ruane, Technical Manager, Meal Solutions category at ASDA commented:
'We're looking forward to introducing this new packaging technology to the
products we sell in our stores in the coming weeks and months. It will help us
further reduce the environmental impact of the packaging we use, improve product
quality and reduce waste - a pretty powerful combination.' "
BUT, he certainly will not be making their policy OR investment decisions for them .
stockdog
- 11 Sep 2005 17:22
- 9139 of 27111
Interesting snippet from Monday's trader's thread press round up - nonewspaper named as source.
"ASDA has been accused of being 'unreasonable' by one of its suppliers after it ended a contract for ready meals without going to mediation - The Telegraph"
who would that be?
seroxat
- 11 Sep 2005 17:45
- 9140 of 27111
Agree with biscuit, Greenseal must have been part of the tendering process for Northern Foods. ASDA are completely satisfied with Greenseal and intend to push this technology into as many applications as possible, there's no way they're going to negotiate a 30 million pound contract and not include Greenseal, and possibly starpol 2000, for which they've publicly stated they expect several hundred machines retrofitted in 10 months.
Dormar
- 11 Sep 2005 17:58
- 9141 of 27111
Stockdog
Interesting snippet from the Telegraph. If the NF announcement means what we all think it does ( and there is no doubt in my mind that it does ), then the message this sends out to other ASDA suppliers will be heard loud and clear. The message is - if you don't embrace this new technology fast, our business will go to those suppliers that will -
This is excellent news and shows why Stanelco had remained so confident of the take-up of greenseal when others were getting nervous.
I agree with Paul that this is likely to involve Starpol. Otherwise why mention "new packaging"?
Dormar
Niggsy
- 11 Sep 2005 17:59
- 9142 of 27111
driver,
You didn`t say if you agreed or disagreed with my observation ?
Bugz
- 11 Sep 2005 18:15
- 9143 of 27111
Niggsy.
You're 100% correct. You are clever.
No a technical manager won't make investment desicions, as he is a technical manager. Surprising that. As a technical manager, he'll probably give a 'technical' view of new packaging to the management.
The under 18 option is possible here driver.......
Niggsy
- 11 Sep 2005 18:24
- 9144 of 27111
Thanks Bugz ,
"Niggsy.
You're 100% correct. You are clever."
Niggsy
- 11 Sep 2005 18:31
- 9146 of 27111
driver, are you a lorry driver?
You certainly have the bad manners of a very poor one.
Bugz
- 11 Sep 2005 18:41
- 9148 of 27111
Wish I could look at the world through the eyes of Niggsy. Bloody hell I'd love it!! Picking up on everything that pleased my eye, and ignoring everyelse.... Please child, up to your room, close the door and leave us quiet folks here to some peace....
markusantonius
- 11 Sep 2005 19:17
- 9149 of 27111
Agree with Driver..... Come on guys - chill.
Need some more cheering up after a very bad week (last week) - is it rouge or le bleu for Stanelco on Monday onwards.....?
bosley
- 11 Sep 2005 22:34
- 9150 of 27111
"ASDA has been accused of being 'unreasonable' by one of its suppliers after it ended a contract for ready meals without going to mediation - The Telegraph"
sd, any chance you could find the full article or is that all there is to it? it has certainly sent shivers down my spine.
STARMAN
- 11 Sep 2005 22:43
- 9151 of 27111
Heres the story and the link
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2005/09/10/cnasda10.xml
Supermarket giant Asda has been accused of being "unreasonable" by one of its suppliers after it ended a contract for ready meals without going to mediation.
Ferndale Foods said its 40m annual contract had been ended, "in spite of requests from Ferndale's management and from the Office of Fair Trading to go to mediation", threatening 600 jobs. A spokesman said the supermarkets' code of practice "requires supermarkets to be reasonable and to act in good faith in terms of notice periods".
James Logan, Ferndale's managing director, said: "This is the code's first real test, but its regulator appears to be powerless."
A spokesman for Asda said Ferndale had been "consulted at every opportunity", adding: "They were fully aware of the situation 18 months ago."
He said Asda had now voluntarily agreed to go to mediation but that Ferndale no longer wished to.
paulmasterson1
- 11 Sep 2005 23:22
- 9152 of 27111
Hi All,
The Ferndale news is a bit strange, as they were involved in Greenseal trials, so I guess ASDA going for the bigger supplier, Northern rather than Ferndale, means we have lost Ferndale's Greenseal licences until next year, but we have gained a possibly larger number with Northern.
Win some, lose some !
Cheers,
PM
Stanelco PLC
01 March 2005
1 March 2005
Stanelco PLC
Asda trials move in-store
Stanelco PLC, the RF (radio frequency) applications group, is pleased to
announce that the trial with ASDA for its high integrity sealing of
Microwaveable Food Trays (CPET) has now successfully proceeded towards actual
use in product at a manufacturing site, through distribution and onto the
supermarket's store shelves.
The shelf life trials, which were conducted at Ferndale Foods on behalf of Asda,
have now concluded. Both microbiological and organoleptic tests produced
encouraging results. This has led to an ASDA product being packaged using Radio
Frequency Technology that will appear on the supermarket's shelves from today
(Tuesday).
Ian Balchin, Chief Executive of Stanelco commented:
'The results of the continuing trials with ASDA remain very encouraging.
Following the recent agreement of a 60-day option period with ASDA concerning
its access to our sealing technology for food retail in the UK and Ireland, we
look forward to progressing the relationship towards a long term commercial
agreement as soon as possible.'
Tony Ruane, Technical Manager, Meal Solutions category at ASDA said:
'This is a first to market for ASDA and a significant milestone in our
partnership with Stanelco. ASDA is delighted with the progress of the trials so
far. The environmental benefits of the technology are immense and we are looking
forward to working with Stanelco to widen the reach of RF packaging in the
coming months to other parts of our business. '
paulmasterson1
- 12 Sep 2005 00:02
- 9153 of 27111
Hi All,
Another economist joins the concensus for oil at $100 a barrel .... Starpol/Biotec looking great :)
Cheers,
PM
Commodity Strategists: Oil May Average $93 in 2007 (Update1)
Sept. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Oil may average $84 a barrel next year, $93 in 2007, and $100 in the fourth quarter of 2007, as demand outpaces supply, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce's chief economist said, jumping ahead of other analysts who are trying to catch up with surging prices.
Rising consumption in China is straining supplies, and damage from Hurricane Katrina to Gulf of Mexico facilities will delay new oil projects in addition to cutting output now, Canadian Imperial's Jeffrey Rubin wrote in a Sept. 7 report. Global supply will be as much as 2.4 million barrels below projected demand by 2007, and the gap will only be closed as rising prices slow demand growth, Rubin wrote.
``We estimate that 1.8 million barrels per day of consumption must be squeezed out next year through the impacts of higher prices,'' Rubin wrote. The gap between supply and demand grows as much as 3 million barrels a day by 2008. Global oil needs are almost 84 million barrels a day now.
The 50 percent rally in oil this year stymied forecasters. They predicted an average $39 a barrel this year, according to the median of 24 analysts, strategists and economists Bloomberg surveyed last December. Oil touched a record $70.85 in New York on Aug. 30, a day after Katrina hit the Gulf Coast. The average price so far this year is $54.77.
Canadian Imperial, Canada's fifth-biggest bank by assets, last November predicted oil would average $52 a barrel in 2005, and in April raised the forecast to $55 and added a 2006 estimate of $61, Peter Buchanan, a senior economist who works with Rubin, said in a phone interview.
Morgan Stanley, Goldman
Other firms are also raising their forecasts. Morgan Stanley's chief economist, Stephen Roach, said this week that he now expects an average price of $64 a barrel for oil next year, and he lowered his global economic growth forecast as a result.
Goldman Sachs & Co.'s commodity strategists, including Steve Strongin, raised their 2006 forecast to $68 on Aug. 18. Arjun Murti, a Goldman Sachs equity analyst who tracks oil producers, roiled markets when he said in March that a ``super spike'' could lift prices as has as $105 a barrel. Even as he made that prediction, he forecast an average price of $55 for all of 2006.
How high prices will have to go to limit demand and get it back in line with global supplies is hard to predict because of the unprecedented rise in China's energy needs, Rubin said in a phone interview.
Consumption in China, the second-largest user of oil after the U.S., and in other expanding Asian economies, is sensitive to rising income and not prices, the CIBC economists said in their report. Per-capita energy use in China in 2003 was about one- tenth of the U.S. rate, according to the U.S. Energy Department.
Chinese Demand
``About 42 percent of the growth in global demand is coming from China, where there is virtually no price sensitivity to demand,'' Rubin said in a separate phone interview. ``There's a huge relationship to income growth there, but a very uncertain relationship to price at all.''
The International Energy Agency today said oil demand is being reduced by record prices. The agency cut its estimate of 2005 world oil demand growth for a third month, citing slower fuel sales in China, Thailand and other Asian countries.
Chinese demand for oil to fuel the fastest-growing major economy in the world is expected to rise 3.4 percent this year, down from 15 percent last year, agency said in a report today. The country's appetite for crude is forecast to expand 7.5 percent in 2006, according to the agency, which advises 26 industrialized nations.
Lack of Supply
The supply needed to meet rising global oil needs will not be coming, according to the CIBC economists. Members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries have ``limited'' opportunities to boost output, and increases in Russian production appear to have reached a plateau, Buchanan said. OPEC pumps about 40 percent of the world's crude oil.
Hurricane Katrina exacerbated the supply crunch by damaging platforms and delaying output from fields such as Thunder Horse, Atlantis and Tahiti, the report said. The Gulf accounts for about 30 percent of daily U.S. oil output and 24 percent of gas production.
Royal Dutch Shell Plc, the biggest oil producer in the Gulf of Mexico's deeper waters, today said output from the Mars field and nearby sites may be shut for the rest of the year because of Katrina.
Gulf of Mexico Outlook
Hurricane Dennis a month and a half ago also did damage in the region. BP found its $1 billion Thunder Horse platform, the largest of its kind, listing at a 20-degree angle after Dennis swept through in July. The project, which was in the development stage, won't start pumping oil this year as originally planned, BP said.
Instead of adding nearly 600,000 barrels of oil a day by 2007, new fields in the Gulf may contribute just 300,000, according to Rubin's report.
``When you juxtapose that with the apparent insensitivity of the demand curve, then what happens is that even though it's a relatively small reduction in supply, you need huge price increases to rein in demand,'' Rubin said during the interview.
Global output will rise about 1.2 million barrels this year and 1.7 million in each of 2006 and 2007, the economists predicted. If demand rises 2.5 percent annually from 2005 until 2007, a shortfall will develop by next year, the report said.
The economists reviewed government and other data and concluded a 10 percent increase in crude prices would reduce demand by 0.7 of a percentage point over three to four years, the report said. This figure is about half the rate used by the U.S. Energy Department in its estimates, the report said.
``You have had a very significant reduction in the growth of demand, something in the neighborhood of a 40 percent reduction in the growth of demand already,'' he said. ``Unfortunately it's taken huge prices to achieve that.''
bosley
- 12 Sep 2005 00:13
- 9154 of 27111
"The appointment follows ASDAs decision to re-launch its ready meals range this coming autumn with new recipes and new packaging. The business is worth around 30 million"
from the northern foods anouncement.
"Ferndale Foods said its 40m annual contract had been ended, "
from the ferndale announcement.
you can see asda mean business. that's a 10m p/a saving straight away. i really do hope this has something to do with greenseal..... but i aint getting my hopes up just yet. next week could be interesting but ii could be correct this time.
"My point before was Asda may have used SE0 to get figures - figures they could use against suppliers and get the cheapest price from them - so the TENDER winner is the one who can supply equal to or less than the Greenseal trial figures - "
i have said before that supermarkets don't give a shit who gets hurt as long as they get their way.
paulmasterson1
- 12 Sep 2005 00:45
- 9155 of 27111
Bosley Hi,
ii talks bo**ocks and always has.
If Northern wanted to win the contract, they are more likely to use Greenseal as a way of lowering costs, and GUARANTEEING qaulity, and extreemly low returns for 'leakers'.
The multiple savings Northern can make by using Greenseal, and Starpol 2000, versus heat and laminated, oil based plastic, was more likely the reason they won the contract, than ASDA forcing their prices down.
Cheers,
PM