edited by moneyam

Shame then that the real nub of Gausie's argument has not been iterated (and I admit to being flippant earlier - I don't believe SueHelen posts under another alias here, as there are enough acolytes)

"I do, however, have an interest in the community that this BB forms - I was one of the first members to join the traders BB and have made many good friends through people I have met here. It sickens me to the core to see people like SH abusing the trust that so many of us have worked so hard to establish as a basis for this online community.

I suspect that none of the so called 'derampers' have a position here, and all have the same objectives - protection of MAM's good name, and a warning bell for those inexperienced potential new community members who may not see SH's actions for what they really are. There is a real possibility that they could be drawn in, lose their pots, and be lost to trading and to MAM forever."

No need to add to that.

Except that I spell much better than blinger.

Thanks explosive....there is no need to waste ur time replying to the derampers. I've just squelched them because they come out with the same one liners.

Gausie - 17 Jan 2006 13:40 - 900 of 904
Agreed - let's get back onto the topic at hand.

Suehelen - you're a liar, a cheat, a bullshitter and a ramper. With multiple aliases.

lol

.... and a useless , brainless tw*t who takes everyone else on here to be a mug.

Just been looking at the Warthog chart SH from thread you start in 2003, hope you have much better luck with this one.

Kivver..again assumptions....I tipped WHOG at 0.30 pence and then they rose by 500% to 2 pence +.....timing is always important.

See RDG and how u lot missed out on a 30% rise so far as well.

SH where have i gone wrong with whog. Just looked at the 3 and 5 year chart on moneyam and nowhere in dec 2003 (when you started the thread) does it show the share was ever .30. a rise after dec then all the way back down again. im confused (but thats easily done)!

Gausie - 17 Jan 2006 13:40 - 900 of 904
Agreed - let's get back onto the topic at hand.

Suehelen - you're a liar, a cheat, a bullshitter and a ramper. With multiple aliases.

lol

.... and a useless , brainless tw*t who takes everyone else on here to be a mug.
-----------------

CATNIP-spell checks are so `90`s darling, I expect you have lots

Kivver......for goodness sake read the comments from post 2 on that thread.....u are just another one of those who only wanna see what they want behind those rose tinted spectacles.....oh yeah u didn't take part in that 600% rise......one more...you missed out on the 30% rise in ENT last week as well....and the 100% rise so far in DMR.

Catnip - Post 914, fair points made, it's not my intention to get anyones back up. I understand that its frustrating to see posts leading others on and the confusion a new trader might feel. Its also frustrating the number of posters who jump on the band waggon and slam a share without consideration or research into exactly what there slaming.

Important Research Note on DMR

Gausie - your link is nothing more than a warning to investors on the oldest con in the book.... This pump and dump technique has long been used in many professions including antiques... Morale of the story is always do your own research. Now very simply what has SueHelen twisted or misrepresented on this thread.

SueHelen reference the below statement
"hidden away are 16m in stone deposits which as they cannot be extracted have been written down and on the books have effectively no value - this value may be unlocked if the dollar falls against the rand"
When you say written down do you mean asset value has been depreciated? If so do you have any balance sheet links showing this or maybe inventory representing the stone deposits? Final question if your answer is no to both the last two questions then are these stone deposits recoverable by DMR?

read it again explosive.

microcap company
buy now - last chance at these prices
suggestion that SH has privileged knowledge.
Claims of building a huge stake on each of her P&D's - posts even before the trade is published - yet never posts sells in this or in any of the others she's worked.

Recognise any of these clues? Classic pump & dump, from a serial offender.

You want snake oil? Be my guest. SH is the slimiest snake on the board.

claims she promoted whog at 0.3 in dec 03 but it was never 0.3 in dec 03. accused me of seeing only what i want to see but you cant see something that was never there.

Recognise any of these clues? Classic pump & dump, from a serial offender.

You want snake oil? Be my guest. SH is the slimiest snake on the board.
-------

LMFCO!!!!!!!!!

whog made a 500% gain yesterday but 600% today for Sue so she says , lol she can't even keep the lies consistent in content.

Be 700% by tomorrow.

(See posts 919 & 922)

Err - already had that Dil

http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=9261#lastread

SueHelen - 08 Jan 2006 19:05 - 12 of 16
Hey chocolat: your alias tells everything about u.

If u are going to dust all the threads then please be man enough to dust them all.....DOC, PMD, CLS, BSP, DMR, ETQ, ELH, CDN, WHOG, SIP

Just from the above DOC went up by 1000%, BSP went up by a 1000%, WHOG went up by 700%, CLS went up by 110%, ELH went bust, CDN went up by 10%, DMR is up by 50% so far......position is SIP was closed well before they went into administration. ETQ - made a profit of 25%....so evident on the threads....from 5 pence to 7 pence. PMD - loss of 25%.

Explosive asked, "now very simply what has SueHelen twisted or misrepresented on this thread?" I can't be bothered dredging through this one, but take a look at SueHelen's ELH thread - and one tiny example. I'm fairly sure it's not down to semantics, or my simple understanding of chronology:

Haystack - 04 Aug 2004 12:09 - 66 of 114
ELH is still falling fast. It is hitting new all time lows day after day. The rate of fall has even increased.

SueHelen - 04 Aug 2004 12:31 - 67 of 114
Good call Haystack but I am going onto hang onto mine as I feel the company will get back on track in the future. My indication now is that these are a long term hold.

SueHelen - 08 Nov 2004 18:10 - 75 of 114
Hi Xmortal, I don't hold these anymore after taking a loss by selling out at 4.00 pence levels back in July.

I am neutral on these for the moment, there is a very large overhang here at the moment so until that clears the price will stay like this. The overhang was created by Fidelity selling around 79 million shares at 1.00 pence about six weeks ago. Hence, the real prices are about 1.75 to sell and around 1.77 to buy.

I am keenly following the developments though.

So Sue , was it 500% , 600% or 700% you made ?

What a total bullsh*tter.

SueHelen - think it may be time to switch to one of your other IDs. This one's reputation is in tatters.

Wonder if we'll spot you? We'll be looking out for a lying, bullshitting, ramping piece of scum. With multiple aliases.