hilary
- 31 Dec 2003 13:00
Your browser does not support JavaScript!
|
|
Your browser does not support JavaScript!
|
Your browser does not support inline frames or is currently configured not to display inline frames.
|
Forex rebates on every trade - win or lose!
hilary
- 10 Dec 2007 16:32
- 9150 of 11056
Seymour,
I wasn't around on Friday although I did look in at about 5:30am before I left home hoping to find a no-brainer cable long, but it was going down at that time so I let it pass by. As it happens, it was pretty close to the low just then but I obviously had no way of knowing that at the time.
There appears to have been a continuation signal to enter long at around 11am, but by lunchtime it was struggling to make higher highs and I'm not really sure why you went long in the first place. If I had just come to the market at that time, I'd have been looking to short it down from there. The next signals to go long didn't materialise until the early evening.
If you do enter the market long based upon a continuation signal on the M1, I really think that the stop should be just under the low before the signal. The 10:55am low looks to have been 2.0301, so that's where I believe your stop should've been.
The idea imo should be to enter the market with a signal on a fast timeframe (eg M1) and to then get that same signal replicating on the slower timeframes (M5, then M15 and so on) so that they keep you in the trade as long as possible.
Seymour Clearly
- 10 Dec 2007 17:10
- 9151 of 11056
Thanks Hils, I thought it wasn't a brilliant entry, but when time is limited and work is pressing I still like to take a few trades.
Edit stopped out +115.
foale
- 11 Dec 2007 07:07
- 9152 of 11056
Small long Cable
Time Traveller
- 11 Dec 2007 11:41
- 9153 of 11056
Good trade SC especially at 50 a point!
That should help towards your expensive trip. LOL
TT
foale
- 11 Dec 2007 12:17
- 9154 of 11056
You know I was thinking...
...a year ago we have 5- 20 regular traders posting on EACH of 3-4 threads....thats stayed at the top of the board constantly...and each tending to post on their own thread 90% of the time..
Now it feels there are so few of us...that seems like about 10-12 regular posters thats are proping up most of the threads on here....
I am talking about those of us that post several times per day, and are active in discussions.
Feels we are limping into 2008...
Anyone else noticed this...or it is just Crimbo already...
hilary
- 11 Dec 2007 12:27
- 9155 of 11056
I agree, D. I've also noticed that new posters don't tend to hang around on the pay-per-view for too long.
The Trader's Thread is totally devoid of ideas and inspiration. I've concluded that it's because 90% of the punters on here really don't have a clue what they're doing.
The other thing I've noticed is that the Trader's Thread on the freeview seems to consist entirely of links by Kyoto. Whilst I certainly wouldn't wish to deny Kyoto the right to make those posts, I don't particularly think that they help in encouraging others to post on the thread.
Edit: That post will probably make me a bit unpopular, but I've said it as I see it.
hilary
- 11 Dec 2007 12:40
- 9156 of 11056
I do have a theory as to why these apparent problems might have come about.
Croc used to be very active in promoting his training courses for wannabe traders and that, in turn, was good for the health of the site and boards. Since his death, there doesn't seem to have been a replacement. Maybe Doris should give the matter some thought.
Just an idea.
Divetime
- 11 Dec 2007 14:05
- 9157 of 11056
Hillary agree with you about David, been on two off his courses,found his posts very inspiring greatly missed.
Not a good day so far long Euro/jpy stopped for -40 Long GDP seems to be going noware must be all waiting for rate decision
hilary
- 11 Dec 2007 14:20
- 9158 of 11056
Volume levels appear to be about 15% of where they were yesterday across the board. As you say - people staying out ahead of the Fed.
chocolat
- 11 Dec 2007 14:32
- 9159 of 11056
Seymour Clearly
- 11 Dec 2007 14:39
- 9161 of 11056
Afternoon folks, having the day off today. Got caught in a smash last night, a few bumps and bruises but I'm walking. Two cars tried to take me out after skidding on black ice, I managed to miss the first but the second got me :-( Father-in-law's 24 yr old BMW which he's had from new, very crumpled now but have just seen a car at the scrapyard which was involved in a similar smash this morning but with a fatality - puts the moneymaking into perspective.
Re the posting, agree, there are so few traders posting. I must admit if it wasn't for Hilary (you may blush now) I'd have given up on Fx long before now. Very few seem to be willing to post trades.
Kyoto (I think) did make the point that the threads look very old fashioned compared to blogs and the like - the present style suits me fine but maybe it's not appealing to everyone. I think most newbies seem to be welcomed but there are few people coming to the pay per view site. I joined it because I was fed up of the rubbish that was being spouted on ADVFN. Some good threads over there but a lot of dross.
hilary
- 11 Dec 2007 14:50
- 9162 of 11056
I understand exactly what you're saying, Kyoto, and wouldn't want to see you not post. It wasn't personal.
My point was that anybody looking at the freeview for the first time would see the daily Trader's Thread and their first thought from the thread list would be of encouragement that it was towards the top of the list with, say, 40 posts on it. When they open the thread, though, they quickly realise that 15% of the posts are from Greystone and the other 85% are from you. They must then ask themselves "What's all that about? Where's everybody else?" and depart the scene.
Maybe the answer is to just have one thread which is open to both boards. I can see pros and cons with that though, and suspect that some posters on the per-per-view might object and then stop posting themselves.
It's a difficult one.
maddoctor
- 11 Dec 2007 15:02
- 9164 of 11056
since this is the only active thread i will add my opinion - there have been 3 serious corrections this year and i think many people have had their asses kicked and are no longer active. For myself i have seen the DOW this year taken over by the programme traders and 80 to 100 point moves in 3 minutes has made me very very wary and reluctant to commit with consequences to my desire to trade and post.
foale
- 11 Dec 2007 15:10
- 9165 of 11056
I am going to start posting index trades... (not scalps) on the Ftse / Dax Dow Index thread.... once the Fed is out of the way
the Traders thread on the Investors is mainly links..and agree that might be offputting...and certainly does not feed into the Traders room one, which if today is anything to go by...we should rename as the "Good morning thread"
Its up to all of us to improve things... for 2008
Time Traveller
- 11 Dec 2007 15:43
- 9167 of 11056
SC, sorry to hear about your troubles. Glad to hear that you're OK.
As for the Traders site, there do seem to be fewer people posting now and maybe it is because there is no "easy" money to be made now that the markets go up and down rather than up. We have had a great run since 2003 and the bull market made it easy for us all. I would imagine that most people want to long a stock for the rise and it is harder to get the mindset into place looking for shorts when they are begging to be taken. I still have that problem but am curing myself slowly. It helps when the shorts make money and proves your decisions correct.
The point about the computerised programme traders is valid. I even saw a prog on TV recently where a new fund management co was redesigning its software to speed up the execution of trades. They said the human was too slow and their new system could identify the trades and complete them in milliseconds. Robotic (bot) trading is taking over and is certainly more prolific that when Croc was monitoring them. This has means that I too am trading the indices as they are being manipulated a bit less than individual stocks. Haven't tried FX yet as it looks far too dangerous for me at the moment although I am sure I could get on the job training through this group if I asked nicely.
TT
foale
- 11 Dec 2007 16:18
- 9168 of 11056
TT/ Kyoto some very valid points made there...
we do need to entice some new blood...and also make it worthwhile for the existing ones to keep returning.
Of course everyone wants something differnt. I remmeber a time when there was alot of "long at...." "short at.." and that was criticised for being too dry...as reasons for trades were not included... but now we are at the other extreme where few trades are posted at all
Also many of the more prolific posters have gone...for numerous reasons...
Treblewide
- 11 Dec 2007 16:59
- 9169 of 11056
can you lot not get a fecking job...it is q4 and year end...go and sell some software :-).
ps the credit crunch is biting hard...just try getting any banks to fork out any new cap-ex spend and you will soon see...it is a feckin nightmare out there.
it is very close to home but to make some money think about what is the first thing to get scrapped when times are tough?...answer is technology...so look at which vendor/s have the largest exposure to the finance sector....and take positions accordingly...only a matter of time