Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


bhunt1910 - 14 Sep 2005 12:29 - 9290 of 27111

African Diamonds has perked up a bit (up 3%) - but no obvious reason why - especially as the rest of the market is down

Baza

markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 12:59 - 9291 of 27111

Many thanks for your constructive SEO-related [not!] comments, HRH Q1. I have "waded" my way through all the posts since your majestic one and have learned sweet FA about SEO ever since. The phrase: "hypocrite!" comes to mind, dear. OK have you got it out of your system now? I wouldn't want a female not to have the last word and huff & puff!

:o)

markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 13:05 - 9292 of 27111

OK so let me refresh the thread... Despite a 2:3 (buys:sells) ratio today, the sp is holding firm which is surely a positive sign, chaps and Maam...?

queen1 - 14 Sep 2005 13:24 - 9293 of 27111

You sexist idiot.

markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 13:50 - 9294 of 27111

You seem to hate a lot of the male species, Queenie? But it is nice to see that you are "taking it on the chin!". What a sport she is, eh chaps? BTW that's 6 consecutive non-SEO related posts from you here, that is: 6/from the last 33 = 18.18%.

Some advice, your Royal Highness - don't bite too easy next time, my dear! :o)

bhunt1910 - 14 Sep 2005 14:41 - 9295 of 27111

Well all this banter about queenie reminds me of a joke

Did you hear the one about the teacher and his pupul.

The teacher asked the little boy to spell "King"

The lettle boy spelt it - K - I - F - N - G

No thats not right said the teacher - try again

The little boy tried again - K - F - I - N - G

No no said the teacher - try one more time

again the little boy tried - K - I - F - N - G

The teacher said to the little boy - but there is no "F" in King

Thats what I have been trying to tell you said the little boy - we havent got an effing king - only have a queen.

Baza - you can tell I am bored can't you!!

markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 14:44 - 9296 of 27111

Well spoken, Baza. Do you think that Queenie needs a King to dominate her and put her in her rightful place?

Oilywag - 14 Sep 2005 14:45 - 9297 of 27111

Baza

A chuckle always helps to lighten a heavy and boring day.

Any more where that came from?

The oily one

markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 14:45 - 9298 of 27111

Like the royal kitchen, for instance!

http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/page1729.asp

KingKonggb - 14 Sep 2005 15:03 - 9299 of 27111

Now who asked for a King?

Digressing, and getting back to SEO, do you think that we will sign up Walmart this year or could there be another big customer (from the States) waiting in the wings? This is just to get some debate started, as boredom sets in!!

Kong

markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 15:51 - 9300 of 27111

With engineers trained and ready & waiting, I think that Walmart is a near dead cert. There are bound to be umpteen negotiations going on behind the scenes which we will never learn about till after a deal is struck. The management have proven themselves to be highly proactive, haven't they?

bosley - 14 Sep 2005 18:15 - 9301 of 27111

markus, i think that might be half the problem , seo having a very proactive management. look back over the last year's announcements and you will see a constant stream of new trial news, then the asda trial and subsequent deal, and since then ......not a lot , really. truth be told not much has happened or developed since april and that is being reflected in the ever decreasing sp. for holders from sub 10p days it isn't too worrying, but, for newer holders this cannot be a very good time. all i can say to them is to remember why you bought in the first place and to be patient. seo are very much a company with enormous potential and that potential needs time to develope.

stockdog - 14 Sep 2005 19:28 - 9302 of 27111

too right, bosley.

This really is a company that you can imagine looking back on in 5 years time and marvelling that you had the patience, skill and discipline to hold whilst it rose 10 fold - no hyperbole intended, seriously.

There's no telling if it will fall on hard times over the intervening years which is a very long time in stock market terms, but there will be plenty of warning to get out with good profits if that happens.

Keep the faith for the sake of your future wealth!

sd

markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 20:10 - 9303 of 27111

Message for Ms. Queen1 - Thank you very much for your private email a few mins. ago.

You mentioned "bravado talk". But for the record, yours truly has NEVER used any bad lingo on this or any other thread EVER. My comments were made purely in context and all in good fun. What was the phrase you used - "If you can't take it, then don't dish it out [blah, blah, blah]...!" ?

You have insulted several posters here (not just myself) in a very bad way. Might I suggest that you have a re-re-read of what you, I and others have written, above, and then bow your head in shame, my dear...?

Interesting that you insult me privately via a M-AM email but do not reciprocate the opportunity for others to reply in the same way! How "sad" [to quote HRH!] is that? Have you emailed everyone else who's had a bash at you, above? G*d, you are one brave cookie, aren't you?

Anyway back to watching the footie. Have a great day, your Majesty.

M.

markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 20:30 - 9304 of 27111

For those of you curious, please read below Her Royal Highness's private mail to me * verbatim / unedited * in the interests of fair play...
____________________________________________________________________

This email has been sent via the MoneyAM Website (http://www.moneyam.com)

To reply to this email you will need to go to the MoneyAM Bulletin Boards
and click on the name of the user that sent you this email and then click
the 'message button'.

The following message was sent by queen1:
http://www.moneyam.com/profile.php?user=queen1

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I really do feel sorry for you. Lots of bravado on the thread with your
mates but deep down you are one insecure, scared little man. I bet you've
been dominated by women your whole life without the ability to actually
approach one in a coherent way. You obviously hate them for that. It truly
is sad.
___________________________________________________________________

Unfortunately any posters wishing to contact HRH are unable to do so because of her royal anonymity and immunity to critiscism.

bhunt1910 - 14 Sep 2005 20:47 - 9305 of 27111

Theres no "F" in King - and she sure is no "F" in Queen

So sad

Baza

markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 20:48 - 9306 of 27111

Thanx, Baza!

queen1 - 14 Sep 2005 21:49 - 9307 of 27111

Roman Boy - I wrote to you off thread so as not to clutter it up with non-SEO related posts. This was the very reason I had a (quite reasonable) gripe in the first place. But all you've done is waste more people's reading time and induced this response. I know that I used a swear word in my original point and how terrible that's obviously been for some people to hear but my point was, and still is, why is there so much non-SEO related posting? One comment flying my way was that I haven't contributed. Is that a pre-requisite for reading threads? I hadn't seen that in the MoneyAM small print. The threads on the BBs are about shares, for people who own or are thinking of owning shares. There are plenty of chatrooms flying around on the Internet for other commentaries. Which was precisely why I emailed you off thread. Simple.

markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 21:53 - 9308 of 27111

OK, Queenie, Roman Boy accepts your apology. You are forgiven, dear. BTW don't think twas moi who Q. your "contribution", was it?

Anyway let us all move on from this...

paulmasterson1 - 14 Sep 2005 21:57 - 9309 of 27111


Hi All,

Another one for the capsule RNS :)

"Coni-Snap capsules from CAPSUGEL are the world's most popular brand of two-piece gelatin capsule. The product of choice by leading pharmaceutical and dietary supplement companies for over 50 years, Coni-Snap capsules are renowned for their consistent and reliable performance"

http://www.capsugel.com/products/conisnap.php

They are actually a Pfizer Inc. company .... http://www.pfizer.com/pfizer/are/mn_about_all.jsp

Other Pfizer Web Sites

Capsugel - The world's leading supplier of two-piece capsules.



I was bound to find the number one capsule manufacturer eventually .... LOL !!!!

Cheers,
PM



Register now or login to post to this thread.