SueHelen
- 06 Oct 2005 19:29
edited by moneyam
chocolat
- 19 Jan 2006 12:18
- 930 of 1904
Err - already had that Dil
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=9261#lastread
SueHelen - 08 Jan 2006 19:05 - 12 of 16
Hey chocolat: your alias tells everything about u.
If u are going to dust all the threads then please be man enough to dust them all.....DOC, PMD, CLS, BSP, DMR, ETQ, ELH, CDN, WHOG, SIP
Just from the above DOC went up by 1000%, BSP went up by a 1000%,
WHOG went up by 700%, CLS went up by 110%, ELH went bust, CDN went up by 10%, DMR is up by 50% so far......position is SIP was closed well before they went into administration. ETQ - made a profit of 25%....so evident on the threads....from 5 pence to 7 pence. PMD - loss of 25%.
chocolat
- 19 Jan 2006 12:25
- 931 of 1904
Explosive asked, "now very simply what has SueHelen twisted or misrepresented on this thread?" I can't be bothered dredging through this one, but take a look at SueHelen's ELH thread - and one tiny example. I'm fairly sure it's not down to semantics, or my simple understanding of chronology:
Haystack - 04 Aug 2004 12:09 - 66 of 114
ELH is still falling fast. It is hitting new all time lows day after day. The rate of fall has even increased.
SueHelen - 04 Aug 2004 12:31 - 67 of 114
Good call Haystack but I am going onto hang onto mine as I feel the company will get back on track in the future. My indication now is that these are a long term hold.
SueHelen - 08 Nov 2004 18:10 - 75 of 114
Hi Xmortal, I don't hold these anymore after taking a loss by selling out at 4.00 pence levels back in July.
I am neutral on these for the moment, there is a very large overhang here at the moment so until that clears the price will stay like this. The overhang was created by Fidelity selling around 79 million shares at 1.00 pence about six weeks ago. Hence, the real prices are about 1.75 to sell and around 1.77 to buy.
I am keenly following the developments though.
Dil
- 19 Jan 2006 13:26
- 932 of 1904
So Sue , was it 500% , 600% or 700% you made ?
What a total bullsh*tter.
Gausie
- 19 Jan 2006 13:32
- 933 of 1904
SueHelen - think it may be time to switch to one of your other IDs. This one's reputation is in tatters.
Wonder if we'll spot you? We'll be looking out for a lying, bullshitting, ramping piece of scum. With multiple aliases.
blinger
- 19 Jan 2006 14:43
- 934 of 1904
SueHelen - think it may be time to switch to one of your other IDs. This one's reputation is in tatters.
Wonder if we'll spot you? We'll be looking out for a lying, bullshitting, ramping piece of scum. With multiple aliases.
Thread List Earlier Posts
-------------------
lololol!!!!!!!!!! splendid stuff.
Kivver
- 19 Jan 2006 16:20
- 935 of 1904
i must be really thick. Dec 23 2003 (when SH started the thread) Whog 2.5p today 0.28p, will someone please tell me where i am going wrong. where has this 700% rise come from???? for about 2 days it rose to 6.75p then quickly fell all way back and under. If backers of SH and SH him/herself wants some of us too take him/her seriously you need to post some common sense. If the charts on MoneyAM are wrong then of course i apologize.
Balli
- 19 Jan 2006 16:52
- 936 of 1904
4M buy just came through!!!!!
capetown
- 19 Jan 2006 17:04
- 937 of 1904
Hi Sue,
$mill BUY,
Tick up soon?
Keep well!!!!
AndrewThomson77
- 19 Jan 2006 17:05
- 938 of 1904
a 23800 investment, plus tax, and its just lost 5800 because of the spread! now worth 18000
AndrewThomson77
- 19 Jan 2006 17:06
- 939 of 1904
it wasn't a 4M - it was 4 million shares, which is an awful lot less!
capetown
- 19 Jan 2006 17:11
- 940 of 1904
IT STILL is a BUY!!!!!!!
mjr1234
- 19 Jan 2006 17:20
- 941 of 1904
Looks like a rollover. 2x2,000,000 with 0.01p/share difference for the MM.
jameel06
- 19 Jan 2006 17:33
- 942 of 1904
MJR, what does that mean? In plain English!
jameel06
- 19 Jan 2006 17:36
- 943 of 1904
MJR, I get what you mean... now that looks interstin that 4mn buys at such a high price I might dip in! Any views on sp performance?
Gausie
- 19 Jan 2006 17:37
- 944 of 1904
Of course it's a rollover.
Someones holding a 2m share position, either short or long on a T+, and has chosen to lengthen the period they hold for, either because the share price hasnt reached their target, or they can't afford to take a loss on closing the position.
SueHelen - you said you had more than 2m - are they bought and paid for, or is your pump and dump turning sour .......?
Gausie
- 19 Jan 2006 17:40
- 945 of 1904
jameel - the price is irrelevant. When you rollover a t+ trade you agree with your broker how much margin they'll take - in this case 0.01p x 2m. (200)
You can execute the trade at any price between bid and offer, makes no difference - essentially, you're closing an old position and opening a new position. You do this by buying the shares on one side that you're selling to yourself on the other.
Sophisticated pump & dump merchants sometimes use this technique without rolling over to manipulate the charts by artificially generating volume and to confuse and encourage novice/sucker investors.
Don't be the idiot that falls for it.
jameel06
- 19 Jan 2006 17:41
- 946 of 1904
Gasuie, thankx for your advice
AndrewThomson77
- 19 Jan 2006 17:55
- 947 of 1904
Gausie, thanks. You learn something new every day.
Should trades like that not be marked to distinguish them from an ordinary trade?
lanayel
- 19 Jan 2006 18:27
- 948 of 1904
Should trades like that not be marked to distinguish them from an ordinary trade?
Talk like that and SueHelen will throw a wobbly !!
SueHelen
- 19 Jan 2006 21:18
- 949 of 1904
Hi Capetown,
T-9 trading days (approx) until update from asset sale in South Africa
Seen the 2 * 2 million trades.....definite a rollover. Though its good to know that someone is holding 2 million shares at a price of 0.60 pence - must be confident.