Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 20:10 - 9303 of 27111

Message for Ms. Queen1 - Thank you very much for your private email a few mins. ago.

You mentioned "bravado talk". But for the record, yours truly has NEVER used any bad lingo on this or any other thread EVER. My comments were made purely in context and all in good fun. What was the phrase you used - "If you can't take it, then don't dish it out [blah, blah, blah]...!" ?

You have insulted several posters here (not just myself) in a very bad way. Might I suggest that you have a re-re-read of what you, I and others have written, above, and then bow your head in shame, my dear...?

Interesting that you insult me privately via a M-AM email but do not reciprocate the opportunity for others to reply in the same way! How "sad" [to quote HRH!] is that? Have you emailed everyone else who's had a bash at you, above? G*d, you are one brave cookie, aren't you?

Anyway back to watching the footie. Have a great day, your Majesty.

M.

markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 20:30 - 9304 of 27111

For those of you curious, please read below Her Royal Highness's private mail to me * verbatim / unedited * in the interests of fair play...
____________________________________________________________________

This email has been sent via the MoneyAM Website (http://www.moneyam.com)

To reply to this email you will need to go to the MoneyAM Bulletin Boards
and click on the name of the user that sent you this email and then click
the 'message button'.

The following message was sent by queen1:
http://www.moneyam.com/profile.php?user=queen1

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I really do feel sorry for you. Lots of bravado on the thread with your
mates but deep down you are one insecure, scared little man. I bet you've
been dominated by women your whole life without the ability to actually
approach one in a coherent way. You obviously hate them for that. It truly
is sad.
___________________________________________________________________

Unfortunately any posters wishing to contact HRH are unable to do so because of her royal anonymity and immunity to critiscism.

bhunt1910 - 14 Sep 2005 20:47 - 9305 of 27111

Theres no "F" in King - and she sure is no "F" in Queen

So sad

Baza

markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 20:48 - 9306 of 27111

Thanx, Baza!

queen1 - 14 Sep 2005 21:49 - 9307 of 27111

Roman Boy - I wrote to you off thread so as not to clutter it up with non-SEO related posts. This was the very reason I had a (quite reasonable) gripe in the first place. But all you've done is waste more people's reading time and induced this response. I know that I used a swear word in my original point and how terrible that's obviously been for some people to hear but my point was, and still is, why is there so much non-SEO related posting? One comment flying my way was that I haven't contributed. Is that a pre-requisite for reading threads? I hadn't seen that in the MoneyAM small print. The threads on the BBs are about shares, for people who own or are thinking of owning shares. There are plenty of chatrooms flying around on the Internet for other commentaries. Which was precisely why I emailed you off thread. Simple.

markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 21:53 - 9308 of 27111

OK, Queenie, Roman Boy accepts your apology. You are forgiven, dear. BTW don't think twas moi who Q. your "contribution", was it?

Anyway let us all move on from this...

paulmasterson1 - 14 Sep 2005 21:57 - 9309 of 27111


Hi All,

Another one for the capsule RNS :)

"Coni-Snap capsules from CAPSUGEL are the world's most popular brand of two-piece gelatin capsule. The product of choice by leading pharmaceutical and dietary supplement companies for over 50 years, Coni-Snap capsules are renowned for their consistent and reliable performance"

http://www.capsugel.com/products/conisnap.php

They are actually a Pfizer Inc. company .... http://www.pfizer.com/pfizer/are/mn_about_all.jsp

Other Pfizer Web Sites

Capsugel - The world's leading supplier of two-piece capsules.



I was bound to find the number one capsule manufacturer eventually .... LOL !!!!

Cheers,
PM



markusantonius - 14 Sep 2005 22:06 - 9310 of 27111

Cheers, PM1. Accept your answers to my Q. from yesterday btw.

ptholden - 14 Sep 2005 22:08 - 9311 of 27111

HRH

Perhaps if the tone of your post had been better phrased, the response would have elicited better press. But having read yr diatribe to M-A, I guess tact is not your strong suit. When all said and done, if you don't like the content of a particualr thread....don't read it!!

Paul

Best you send them an email and make sure they are aware SEO's product. Whilst you are about it can you send SEO one as well and tell them to get a move on? I would feel a lot more comfortable in the short term if we could see a bit of SP moving news. Don't think we will get anything this week though.

pth

paulmasterson1 - 14 Sep 2005 22:16 - 9312 of 27111


Markus Hi,

Cool :)

Cheers,
PM

paulmasterson1 - 14 Sep 2005 22:17 - 9313 of 27111


PTH Hi,

I sent them (Capsugel) an e-mail about 10 mins ago :)

Cheers,
PM

Phart68 - 14 Sep 2005 22:18 - 9314 of 27111

Stanelco develops alternative to gelatine hardshells

By Dominique Patton

14/09/2005 - UK-based Stanelco says it has developed a starch-based alternative to gelatine hardshell capsules that could also offer cost benefits for dietary supplement makers.

Gelatine,, an animal derived material, is becoming less favoured as a delivery form owing to recent safety scares in the meat industry and the increase in number of vegetarians.

Vitamin and supplement ingredient makers are increasingly offering formulations without gelatine to meet market demand but many of these are more expensive than the standard gelatine variants.

The main alternative to gelatine hardshell capsules is HPMC (hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose), a synthetic material with a significantly higher cost base than gelatine.

Stanelco said in a statement on Monday that both its starch-based material and the manufacturing process offer the prospect of lower unit costs of production than for gelatine capsules.

Gelatine capsule shells are currently made using a dip moulding process followed by a slow drying process, which injection moulded starch-based alternatives do not require. They are ready for filling immediately following manufacture.

Starch-based hard-shell capsules also offer greater resilience to humidity and heat than gelatine and allow for easy filling since they are non-static.

The product, in development for five years, still needs to get regulatory approval before the product can be consumed by humans but the firm is now looking to join up with third parties to optimise formulations and develop the route to market.

“We believe that the world market for hard capsules is significantly larger than that for soft capsules with many billions of hard capsules produced annually,” said Stanelco.

The product was created by subsidiary Adept Polymers - which developed the new polymer blend along with recently acquired Biotec Holding - and partner Carclo Technical Plastics, working on the capsule.

Stanelco's subsidiary, Aquasol Limited, filed for patent protection for the new hardshell capsule in 1999. The patent, which is jointly owned with Carclo, is proceeding to grant in various territories.

The design of the capsule also offers tamper evident and novel dissolution features as well as the possibility of multi-compartments.


http://www.nutraingredients.com/news/news-ng.asp?n=62500-stanelco-gelatine-capsule

;-)

paulmasterson1 - 14 Sep 2005 22:24 - 9316 of 27111





Hi All,

Just reading Pfizer SEC filings, where it states 'Capsugel and Pfizer CenterSource' had turnover for the first 6 months of 2005, of $451m, up 5% ....

CenterSource don't do much by the look of it, they only feature in the accounts, and there is no other information on what this part of the business does.

Cheers,
PM



paulmasterson1 - 14 Sep 2005 22:30 - 9317 of 27111


Obo Hi,

The Citywire link don't work :(

This one does though :)

http://www.citywire.co.uk/Home/Search.aspx?SearchPhrase=stanelco

Cheers,
PM

oblomov - 14 Sep 2005 22:41 - 9318 of 27111



Thanks Paul - now yours doesn't work! The link keeps changing.

You'll need to do a fresh search for Stanelco on the page that turns up - the article in question is headed 'Fund Result: Brough's spending fears ' dated 14th. Sept.

paulmasterson1 - 14 Sep 2005 22:45 - 9319 of 27111


Obo Hi,

I just tried it again and it worked ?

I am only doing a link to a search for Stanelco, not to the document itself, the first result on the page from my link is the one to choose :)

Cheers,
PM

shamona - 14 Sep 2005 23:12 - 9320 of 27111

The capsule is still in development and is several years behind the Bprg offering who go commercial in less than six months, i'm afraid this pluff rns appears to be just a smokescreen to prop up the price as this market is sown up.

Why announce it now? it's patent was filed six years ago; they claim to have worked on it for five years and regulatory approval and machine design will take another five if it ever gets that far. These things tend to cost many many millions of pounds to get to commercialisation.

ps emailing these companies is futile, all companies like Stanelco and Bioprogress have sales teams speaking to the right people and will not take kindly to shareholders embarresing them with amateur sales attempts.

stockdog - 14 Sep 2005 23:17 - 9321 of 27111

yaaaaaaawwwwwnnn! bed-time, definitely

zebed-d

Bugz - 14 Sep 2005 23:17 - 9322 of 27111

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz......Wrong thread again Shamona, funny how you keep clicking the wrong button.........
Register now or login to post to this thread.