LEEWINK
- 28 Mar 2004 15:45
NML is due its interrim results now, last year it was the 28th of this month.
They are setting up a new site to explore/research/analyse and all the equipment to do this should be on site now, and drilling should start soon, all this extra news should be covered in the interims.
does anyone have any further positive views on this company ??
ASMITH2
- 21 Jun 2005 13:07
- 937 of 1909
In the very unlikely event of nml updating the market anytime soon expect further falls in the sp to 2.75/3.25p .
mjr1234
- 21 Jun 2005 13:08
- 938 of 1909
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 21 Jun 2005 13:11
- 939 of 1909
mjr1234
Please do not post other users personal details such as their name on these boards.
Ian
GayBriefs
- 21 Jun 2005 14:17
- 940 of 1909
ASmith2
With no one prepared to buy this stock anymore for the love of money and the market makers anxiously trying to give these away a drop looks very probable imo.
mjr1234
- 21 Jun 2005 14:18
- 941 of 1909
Why?
Can't see any sellers GayBriefs.
Why are so many non-holders posting on this thread?
A bit strange that don't you think?
Or are they all the same sad individual (EDITED MONEYAM)?
takahe
- 21 Jun 2005 14:22
- 942 of 1909
I wonder why they all (!) keep hanging around, if they have sold out.
ASMITH2
- 21 Jun 2005 15:34
- 944 of 1909
LOL - Theres your seller again hes taking 3.5p now for the 500ks - still confident are we of good news!!!
mjr1234
- 21 Jun 2005 15:37
- 945 of 1909
Good riddance.
ASMITH2
- 21 Jun 2005 15:41
- 946 of 1909
Millions more where that came from mjr1234
If this seller is dumping on Inside Information there are going to be some real burned fingers with this.
mjr1234
- 21 Jun 2005 15:46
- 947 of 1909
There's also going to be some real prison sentences for the insider dealers as well as all the derampers on here who claimed to "know something", if that turns out to be the case.
Which it won't, because they are just juvenile bullshitters.
ASMITH2
- 21 Jun 2005 15:51
- 948 of 1909
Be very careful mjr1234 do you honestly think someone would dump huge amounts of shares if they knew good news was about to be released,of course not but they would dump them if they knew bad news was on its way now wouldnt they.
We have only got the trades to speculate on.
mjr1234
- 21 Jun 2005 15:53
- 949 of 1909
They would dump them if they didn't know if good or bad news was about to be released.
Why do you automatically assume larger sells are from insider dealers (an illegal activity)?
Was the 225k buy yesterday from an insider dealer?
mjr1234
- 21 Jun 2005 16:29
- 950 of 1909
WOW 3.5p what a bargain. Can only get 10k though grrrrr.
takahe
- 21 Jun 2005 16:29
- 951 of 1909
ASMITH2- how interesting that you are still taking such an interest. I am recording your posts.
mjr1234
- 21 Jun 2005 16:40
- 952 of 1909
Nice 660k buy.
Lots of smoke and mirrors going on. I say good news tomorrow now the mystery buyer has got in on the cheap.
Wendy D
- 21 Jun 2005 18:30
- 953 of 1909
I would put it to most posters here that an awful lot of things have been overlooked - or perhaps deliberately ignored?
Some proper research would reveal a lot.
EWRobson
- 21 Jun 2005 19:37
- 954 of 1909
If you look at the actual trades there is no evidence of anything sinister: (1)in the last sevcen days, sells have been consistent at 3.5p with higher prices likely to be buys, it is the spread that has varied depending on quotes from MMs presumably; (2) there has been nothing of any size until this afternoon and, though 550K looks big, its only 20K; (3) if there has been some shorting it is pretty small beer. Suggestion that evolution are shorting: if they were they would do a better job of it!
I agree with Wendy, takahe, mjr, dynamite that the jury is out, but that there are many positive considerations, although also negative concerns. Also baffled why those who have sold continue to pester the bb rather than move on. If I return to a former holding, fallen on bad times (e.g. YOO), its probably, first, to commsierate, second to put something positive back in.
Eric
Andy
- 21 Jun 2005 20:37
- 955 of 1909
Eric,
1) IMHO the price has been held at 3.5p BID to prevent selling, especially from 3.7p placees.
2) That's a fair amount if it was a private investor, IMO.
3) NOBODY in their right mind would short NML (or any other stock) at 3.5p, as the potential downside is limited ie 3.5p. whereas any good news would drive the price up quite quickly.
takahe
- 21 Jun 2005 20:42
- 956 of 1909
I don't think you can short NML..
to prevent selling from 3.7p placees...nonsense...MMs don't give two hoots for who is selling..if it is placees or whoever. How would they know?. It could be Zuks liquidating much needed money