for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

shamona
We was on here long before pm1, see SEO board 2 of this thread dated Mar 2004

"Bring back Queenie...!"

I wonder how many trials BPRG have had that did not meet expectations ? - I dont suppose we will ever know.

Here

Driver - I just love the Blackboard

You must tell me how to get hold of it - I could use it to rally the troups up for our regular Tursday night drinkies.

baza

.....back to more mundane things - I see we have ticked up a quarter whilst we were having our moment of lunchtime frivolity.

baza

All the same this thread makes for intresting reading, I think its the only thread where you can't all place nicely!!
Have to admit though 20 a share does take the piss..... Whats the time frame on this? Anyone wanna do odds cos I reckon I could make some money with an against bet!!

Children!!
Did the last post mean "play nicely"?
Please do.

nb I am also a holder- for my Grandchildren

http://www.in-pharmatechnologist.com/news/news-ng.asp?n=62545-stanelco-gelatine-capsule

20 is a bit optimistic I agree explosive. I'm looking at the 80p - 1 region, slightly less than driver. Although that was only factoring Greenseal and not the capsule options....

Sham - to date I could be described as a spotty teenager, prehaps just a little over it being 22 but in the region. So far I am loving the roll of stanelco-I have made more money in a day than I have in my entire life on this stock. If it does go back to 2P, many of us will have only lost half of our original stake. You have warned us.

Now, as you are not long in SEO and cannot have a constructive discussion, please go away.... Normally the young act like silly twats, but I presume you're a bit older......and evidently bitter. Grow up and move ON! God help us PLEASE!

Explosive,

20 .... 3-5 years .... you want a bet .... bring it on !

PM

LOL !!

Thats a market cap of over 20 BILLION pounds, lol!

For a company sealing a lid on a tray:-o

Sorry couldn't resist replying to such utter crap!

The sad thing is some people will believe this nonsense.

sham owner still here I see, so much for pi55ing of, just like I said earlier, the bu115hit never stops from that one ....

PM

To put it in context, British Airways market cap is only around 3.5 billion!

The same market cap as Oil GIANT BP!!!!!!!

LOL !!

Have to say that 20 is very optimistic. If the Greenseal conversion was flying off the shelves then I may agree but as the rollout is slow (and it could well accelerate), then anywhere between 1-2 in about 12-18 months. Well that's my bet. As for the end of the year, excluding any deals with Walmart etc then as we are now or maybe a little lower. If you include Walmart or another big US retailer / customer then 30-40p.

IMHO

Kong

Just trying to get a quick update; somewhat difficult with the ranting of a certain individual. The piece I liked was basa's parable of the good and wicked tenants. He missed out though the important finale that shamona was cast into outer darkness with wailing and gnashing of teeth whilst bos entered into the joy of prosperity!

Eric

Kingkonggb: thank goodness we can switch back to the purpose of the thread. Timing is only easy to judge with 20/20 hindsight. Looking forward to the middle of next year, it is a reasonable assumption that the ASDA deal will have delivered the goods with say 300 Greenseal deliveries. The other reasonable assumption is that there will have been positive progress with the US market and that Starpol will be delivering really good profits, plus contributions from other products. The key factor for the sp, I suggest, remains the movement in the US market If you took a Low Medium High (L, M, H) scenario then L would be progress to emulate the ASDA deal, without either exclusivity or Wal-Mart. M would include Wal-Mart alongside other business. H would be Wal-Mart exclusivity with a worldwide deal in which they have placed Greenseal as a key part of their strategy; a variant might be a non-exclusive deal but giving an aggressive roll-out. Without going into any calculations, then the sp for the three cases could well be of the order of: L 20p, M 50p, H 150p. Thus the outcome is dependent very heavily on negotiations that are no doubt currently taking place. The wise servent/tenant is he who actually tucks his shares away rather than trading them! We relatively unwise who tend to trade via cfd's could be caught with our holdings reduced and unable to act quickly enough on good news. Sorry, chaps, I've not given answers but hope I have helped to define the problem!

Eric

Heres an interesting twist to the story from another board.

As I thought, SEO is the Claimant and BPRG the Defendant! This means it is SEO that are defending their patents and BPRG who are trying to 'steal' them. So it could well be a case of how much BPRG have to pay SEO. Now that would be an interesting scenario what with BPRG being in such a mess; How the hell are they going to be able to pay?

Appeals Verdict 16th or 17th Jan. 06

1 appeal submitted by Bio (the Defendant) and 2 from SEO (the Claimant)

A3/2005/0819 Stanelco RF Technologies Ltd v Bioprogress Technology Ltd. Appeal of Defendant from order of Mr Christopher Floyd QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge), dated 2 November 2004, filed 15 April 2005.

A3/2005/0823 Stanelco RF Technologies Ltd v Bioprogress Technology Ltd. Appeal of Claimant from order of Mr Christopher Floyd QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge), dated 2 November 2004, filed 15 April 2005.

A3/2005/0824 Stanelco RF Technologies Ltd v Bioprogress Technology Ltd. Appeal of Claimant from order of Mr Christopher Floyd QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge), dated 9 December 2004, filed 15 April 2005.

shamona, i really do not understand what your problem is and this whole "debate " is tedious. there is absolutely nothing new being said. i repeat,timewill tell who is right or wrong,so leave it at that and let's see where we all are in a year's time.

Surely SEO would be the claiment though driver as they are the ones appealing the original decision no?