Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Tadpole Evolves (TAD)     

ainsoph - 23 May 2003 13:32

A new thread that may swim in hibernation for a few days or weeks as the process of evolution takes place ......

Imagine a slimmed down debt free company with one division stacked with orders and self financing with cash in the bank.

Then imagine a partner for the other division with pockets so deep that they could fund a rocket to the moon ..... and back

Dreaming of course but Tads can do that to you ..... what a gem or is that a bygone dream as well .....


ainsoph


We started the day at 4.75p mid - risk grade 583 - currently 6p - spamming posts 63 out of 140

Fugitive - 25 May 2003 11:52 - 94 of 729

Worth pointing - our "in the know" ainsey started the week by saying he/she was not expecting anything to happen with TAD for 2 weeks at least - the same week that TAD actually jumps.

Really he/she hasn't got a clue. Just a huge holding and lots of wishful thinking.

He/she has however avoided the mistake of labeling his/her new thread a "TRADING" thread.

In support of the truth,

F

TullettJ (MoneyAM) - 25 May 2003 11:58 - 95 of 729

Hi,

Further to Ian's posts on Friday, can you please cut the insults/critisms and talk about share trading?

Thank you.

J.

gravy - 25 May 2003 12:02 - 96 of 729

Tullettj :

If i suggested to you that you were on drugs would you
be happy ??

Gravy

UGLYBOATRACE - 25 May 2003 12:06 - 97 of 729

Tullet J

As long as Keith posts here you will have problems .

Remember he was banned from ADVFN as both both KDC and ainsoph amongst others .

Did you work for ADVFN at the time ?

TullettJ (MoneyAM) - 25 May 2003 13:07 - 98 of 729

Uglyboatrace (et al),

It seems that as long as people carry on vendettas there will be problems, no matter where it be.

And yes, I remember when he was banned from ADVFN becuase as you rightly state, I was working there at the time. But if I recall, Croc was banned from ADVFN too, and Bullshare, so does that mean they should all get grief on here too??

However MoneyAM is not ADVFN, never has been. It is a new slate where people can start over. Why bring over old problems? Accept that people can change.

When people are critisised(sp?), they tend to react, strike back, and then the pattern starts, so why not sit back, count to 1000 and let whomever get on with it?

To carry on this bitching as it has been for so long seems like a terrible waste of life to me.

So I ask again, please, draw a line under it, move on and have a happy time trading?

Thanks,
J.

superrod - 25 May 2003 13:24 - 99 of 729

TullettJ
WELL SAID but sadly it aint gonna happen. :o((((



unfortunately.

guru 1 1/4 - 25 May 2003 13:27 - 100 of 729

Gravy

I don't have a position in ETQ and there have been plenty of opportunities to get in with the same wisecracks as you have on Tadpole threads.
Maybe whats good for the goose and all that!

Guru

gravy - 25 May 2003 15:10 - 101 of 729

Ever wondered why nobody gives me any stick on all
the ETQ thread's on advfn guru ???
Because i have been straight from the start.
I have told numerous threads I have sold out after the
latest news and always told the threads when i took profits.

When you become a compulsive liar you annoy fellow posters who
may have took the advice and bought in.
Ainsoph is probably ridiculed by over 200 posters on advfn over
the years because of his terrible calls, his refusal to admit he
loses and his appalling arrogance and ignorance.
Do you approve of his slurrs on the drugs call then guru !!!
I am 100% certain that you are an alias, just because the IP
address is different means nothing, I know the lenghts this
person will go to to deceive and mislead on a bulletim board.

Gravy

ainsoph - 25 May 2003 17:10 - 102 of 729

I think it was time you were banned from this thread gravy and I have mailed the CEO of MAM to ask him to do just that .... most of us are totally fed up with your spam and the fact you apparently use up to 200 aliases to try and ridicule me on other bb's is no reason why you should try here .....

(BTW the words should be lengths - slurs and you should use a capital I rather than i all the time. You have also repeated the word to in the last line)


You have been asked by the CEO and at least two of the moderators to keep the talk on Tads and to stop annoying other posters by slagging them off.


I will have something of significant interest to Tads shareholders later today or tomorrow and I am sure they will not be too pleased to miss it because of this unwanted and unwarranted spam. This is a financial bb not a playground for misfits.




ains

Andy - 25 May 2003 17:24 - 103 of 729

Tulletj,

A well written and well intentioned post, but like Superrod said, "it ain't gonna happen", and I think you know that too!

it's time for Am to assert some authority over this!

UGLYBOATRACE - 25 May 2003 17:57 - 104 of 729

Tullet J

If i were Mike or David i would be VERY upset to be compared to someone like Keith .

The reasons for them being "banned" from ADVFN are hardly the same reasons that Keith was banned for .

In my opinion your site can do without Keith (although at present he does contribute around 50% of posts).

To be honest , i am suprised that Mike allows him to post here after his performances on ADVFN .

Regards

UGLY

guru 1 1/4 - 25 May 2003 18:18 - 105 of 729

Gravy
I can't believe you still spout on about being an alias is it that difficult to comprehend that out of 20,000 private investors more than one of them would find there way onto a public bb and actually have an interest in the share going up.
Cut and paste one of my posts where I have said I made a winning trade or at what privce I have purchased.
If you want to talk about being honest, several weeks back you posted on the ETQ thread saying you were selling because you would not be able to get to a computer the next day ironically though you were able to post on the tad trading thread, so before you try and get all high and mighty with ainsoph take a look closer to home.
Guru

TullettJ (MoneyAM) - 25 May 2003 18:24 - 106 of 729

Uglyboatrace,

I think your main point is in your third sentence:
'Im my opinion'

Now again, can you ALL get the chat back on to trading and investing and cut the other stuff?

I point you all to the 'squelch' button at the top of that page. If you find yourself becoming annoyed/wound up by a poster, rather than raise to the bait and flame back (which is becoming very irritating for all concerned), just 'squelch' them.

Thanks,
J.

gravy - 25 May 2003 18:41 - 107 of 729

guru

You are 100% and definately an ainsoph alias, nobody would
stand by a racist and a person who has made sick comments
about young children.
The fact that you "suddenly" seem to know an awful lot about
my wherabouts on threads, in particular supports this.

As for 200 aliass...LOL....never ever used more than one nn
at the same time, my pc is available to anybody who doubts this ??

Gravy

guru 1 1/4 - 25 May 2003 19:12 - 108 of 729

Like you say you like to be honest about your trading perhaps you could explain the 2 posts below then?



day_dreamer - 28 Nov'02 - 18:25 - 823 of 2653


el juli - 28 Nov'02 - 18:07 - 822 of 822 (Filtered)

Just shows you how mixed up ainsoph is, much be a sad life
to spend it 24 hours a day posting rubbish using alias's not
to mention the racist remarks.

Back to Etq, look at the facts now....12 mill market-cap !!
They have just announced strong interims, drop in debt and
a current business is strong, and then you have the suvair
deal thrown in for virtually free, I'm definately not trading
anymore of these, what I buy I keep before the next batch of good
news, if people want to sell then go ahead but this company
has made so much progress this year to be giving your shares
away at these prices.

Gravy

day_dreamer - 02 Dec'02 - 11:02 - 989 of 2653


Lets not talk about them oldolie :-))

Dont know a lot about that ECK, noticed they have
risen a lot recently.

And like i say i like to be honest with my trades thus
I have closed out my 12k for a small profit at 18p, nothing
has changed but seeing as they were 14p bid on Friday I am
happy to have moved from a decent loss to a small profit on
my trading shares thus I have decided to play safe and sell.

Gravy

Guru

gravy - 25 May 2003 19:21 - 109 of 729

I just cannot believe how many different nicknames this
loner ainsoph will make up just to post on one thread !!!
Note all the nicknames were posting all Saturday night and
ainsoph was cutting and pasting share related news at 1.40 am
this morning, how sad is that !!!!
You are so jealous that ETQ went from 3p when i tipped them to
a high of 29.5p, you will never be able to put that out of your
mind and that makes me very happy.

Like I say Keith, i know it is you behind most of the names and
you will never win :-))
I know all your nicknames on all of the sites and know you post
24/7 because you are a loner with no life....i'm out of here.

Have a great but lonely bank holiday Keith :-))

Gravy

Fugitive - 25 May 2003 19:28 - 110 of 729

so at last we have some truth, although not from ainsoph - he was banned from advfn...

That's a start.

I'm all for talk on trading. But with ainsoph you have someone who apparently was left a lot of money/got the golden handshake/won the lottery, who has invested at the height of the markets and is now trying to become a trader, a "swing trader". Failed trader? And investing seemingly randomly in a load of companies including his/her long term dogs. Of course, especially TAD. Win some lose some. That's how it goes. Does anyone have any idea if the person is really a successful long-term trader with a proven equity curve? No. The good trades are simply shoved in our faces, noone knows the whole truth. And ainsoph is not famed for telling the truth. People detect ainsey is bullshitting, making it up as s/he goes, blatantly lying, and while he is around there will always be trouble because people react against it.

Is this someone you really want to let loose on the public bbs?

Methinks it is not helpful. Worse when one takes the other aliases into account....

Good comedy value, though if you ignore the sinister side.

Just my 2p worth, hope I don't get banned for saying what I think.

F

UGLYBOATRACE - 25 May 2003 20:02 - 111 of 729

Tullett J

Did you not agree with my other points ?

I think you will find that many people think it would be better without Keith .

Why not do a poll of your users (although i suspect many of them are actually Keith in one guise or another) ?

ainsoph - 25 May 2003 20:37 - 112 of 729

is this ugly peeps for real ..... here are some posts from the bb picked at random lol ..... Darwin in reverse .... will he go back to the primeval mud soon





UGLYBOATRACE - 25 May'03 - 12:11 - 139 of 139


ROFLMAO !






UGLYBOATRACE - 25 May'03 - 11:52 - 42 of 42


Keith



C&P at that time of the morning .

Pathetic .




UGLYBOATRACE - 25 May'03 - 12:01 - 11 of 11


Peeps ?







UGLYBOATRACE - 25 May'03 - 11:45 - 11 of 11


Morning Jeff






UGLYBOATRACE - 24 May'03 - 19:12 - 9 of 11


ROFLMAO !


guru 1 1/4 - 25 May 2003 20:49 - 113 of 729

Gravy
I don't know if you are aware but a company went from 5p in Oct 00 to 34p in April 02.
The name of it eludes me currently but I do believe ainsoph tipped it!!!!!

good night
Guru
Register now or login to post to this thread.