maestro
- 08 Oct 2008 09:57
$
tabasco
- 13 Oct 2008 13:16
- 95 of 288
Ian Tas you can see it was not one sided with Scottyhe was baited by packs that run togetherI am now also accused of being Scottyas I was also accused of being The French ConnectionI am not asking you to ban Hillarybut Im sure you get my point!
Hilary - 30 Sep 2008 11:40 - 3056 of 3432
I only looked in on this thread because I read elsewhere on the board that there was a muppet to be baited and so decided to take a peek at the thread for myself.
Hilary - 08 Oct 2008 10:33 - 3303 of 3432
Muppet Baiting's so much more fun than household chores
Such a lovely little chickadee!
HARRYCAT
- 13 Oct 2008 13:18
- 96 of 288
He knew the rules when he joined & was warned.
Some was funny, but most seemed to be late night rants!
Can't see there is any arguement.
tabasco
- 13 Oct 2008 13:27
- 97 of 288
Thats a point of view Harrybut that is all it isthat is what these bbs are all aboutpoints of view..
ptholden
- 13 Oct 2008 13:27
- 98 of 288
tabasco - 13 Oct 2008 13:16 - 95 of 96
Ian Tas you can see it was not one sided with Scottyhe was baited by packs that run togetherI am now also accused of being Scottyas I was also accused of being The French ConnectionI am not asking you to ban Hillarybut Im sure you get my point!
Do you realise how pathetic you sound Tabasco?
Oh I forgot, you don't read my posts, just chuck childish brickbats whenever you can :-)
hilary
- 13 Oct 2008 13:27
- 99 of 288
I wasn't aware that I'd accused you of anything, Tabasco. I merely asked a question as there is an undeniable similarity on your posting styles.
Lots of successive full stops with no space before starting the next word in lower case is one such giveaway.
tabasco
- 13 Oct 2008 13:39
- 100 of 288
Hilary I am the incredible Tabascono aliases! The reason I write in this manner is speed and roomthese are not business lettersjust commentsif you do not like my points of viewmove on!
Big Al
- 13 Oct 2008 14:20
- 101 of 288
Unbelievable, Tabatha. How can you condone the out and out racist comments of Scottie boy? I know I've said that before and it was beyond me how you defended him. If I was of an ethnic minority I'd have been totally offended by some of the comments he made. As for your implication his comments were "debateable", that is laughable. He was an complete racist scumbag and has no place on any forum, be it financial or otherwise.
To not condemn him is to condone racism, which is unacceptable in my view. Sorry.
tabasco
- 13 Oct 2008 14:29
- 102 of 288
Al read my post carefully....ten times..12:37 - 89 of 101... understand the exact words I have writtenonce you have truly taken in my words of wisdomwrite your post again!
oilyrag
- 13 Oct 2008 14:40
- 103 of 288
Maestro, you couldn't possibly lose your house to banking crooks unless you failed in your obligation to make the mortgage repayments.
You were aware how much this costs you each month, and should make provision for it. If you were betting this money each month on spread bets, then your are a bigger prat than I thought.
You should only invest what you can afford to lose, that is not to say that anyone wants to lose, but it is a distinct possibility.
Some of the drivel that you have come out with in the past, leads me to conclude that this is a complete wind up, as I find it hard to believe that your house was only worth 60k. What was it a hovel or a shed?
What this thread does offer however, is the opportunity for posters to discuss their ways of investing and what they consider safe and why.
Personnally, I only invest in actual shares purchased from spare money that I hold. I do not borrow money to invest. I do not set any stop losses, as the markets are inclined to move the price to trigger these.
Yes I do make a loss from time to time, but I am in control of my own investments and can react accordingly to market movements either way. I tend to invest longer term and so am not usually bothered by sudden price movements, unless they are backed up by really bad news.
Big Al
- 13 Oct 2008 14:59
- 104 of 288
Tabatha - read them already and don't need to revisit them thanks. You backed up his racist rantings on other threads as well. Simple.
There is absolutely no excuse for Scottie boy's comments whatsoever and you should comdemn them outright.
dealerdear
- 13 Oct 2008 15:00
- 105 of 288
I for one come on these threads for informed debate and if peeps have nothing to add then they should be quiet. Tis interesting that as the market has turned ugly, more and more insults are being traded between posters.
Humour is a good medicine to sooth those market nerves.
Big Al
- 13 Oct 2008 15:03
- 106 of 288
True
cynic
- 13 Oct 2008 15:05
- 107 of 288
so what's so bloody funny about these markets? - lol!
smiler o
- 13 Oct 2008 15:07
- 108 of 288
Aye .... lifes to short and hard enough as it is , be happy : )
tabasco
- 13 Oct 2008 15:32
- 109 of 288
We are inches away from anyone who admits to having read Noddy Goes To Toyland or to having collected Robertson's jam golliwog badges as a child. being barred from the bbs
Al you have not read my postyour answer had absolutely no relevance to my point of view. You are just troublemaking
I told IAN to watch out who answersI am sure he has!
Smilerexactly my view on life dealer have you noticed the same names are the ones doing the baitingcynic you have lost your moneyso dont lose your sense of humour!
Big Al
- 13 Oct 2008 15:59
- 110 of 288
I'd hope anyone reading scotinvestor's racist posts would be absolutely appalled by their content. Your comments to me when they first appeared some weeks ago was that they were in some way justifiable.
We should unequivocably fight all such comments. You have not done so. Indeed, you earlier suggested he should be re-instated. I nortice not one poster has seconded that request that I've seen and it makes me very happy to see there is no appetite to give him a third chance. Note, he had been warned and requested to desist. AM has always been a very tolerant BB, but has thankfully never put up with that kind of diatribe. None of us should accept it.
ptholden
- 13 Oct 2008 16:18
- 111 of 288
Indeed Al, in full agreement with your views. Actually, I was more appalled at the the poster in question remarks re the Piper-Alpha tragedy and the manner in which he used that disaster in an attempt to wind you up, quite disgusting. I'm afraid Tabasco also excused that behaviour, which tells me everything I need to know about that particular specimen.
I know that Ian takes his responsibilities seriously and will act accordingly if there is a need to do so. I am also sure he is pissing himself laughing Tabasco at your hypocritical behaviour, as I for one have been the butt of your snide, insulting comments for some weeks now. Anyway, carry on, you're swiftly becoming the laughing stock of the BB, an adequate replacement for your bosom buddy, scotinvestor :-))))
Bullshare
- 13 Oct 2008 16:20
- 112 of 288
tabasco; I am very happy to answer your question as to why we ban users who overstep the mark. Its very simple, we have a very good and easy to read code of conduct, people overstep it once, we warn and give them the benefit of the doubt, second time we zap them.
Mike
As part of our commitment to make our Bulletin Boards as informative, user friendly and free from abuse as possible for our users, please read the following Content Standards which apply to any and all material (contributions) which you make to the Website including the Bulletin Boards and which incorporate our General Terms and Conditions .
Your commitment to these Standards ensures a positive experience for all of our users.
The Standards
You must comply with the spirit of the following standards as well as the letter. The Standards apply to each part of any Contribution as well as to its whole.
Contributions must:
Be accurate where they state facts
Be genuinely held where they state opinions
Comply with applicable law in any country from which they are posted
Contributions must not:
Contain any material which is defamatory of any other person;
Contain any material which is obscene or offensive;
Infringe any copyright, database right or trade mark of any other person;
Be likely to deceive any person;
Be made in breach of any legal duty owed to a third party such as a contractual duty or a duty of confidence;
Be likely to harass, upset, embarrass or alarm any other person;
Be likely to disrupt our service in any way;
Give the impression that they emanate from us where this is not the case;
Advocate promote or assist any unlawful act such as (by way of example only) copyright infringement or computer misuse;
Advertise any product or service other than MoneyAM without our prior written consent;
Contain any personal information or details about a fellow poster. Any poster doing so will have the post removed and their access to the bulletin boards revoked;
We caution against giving out any personally identifiable information (such as private email address, telephone number or home address) online. This information can easily be used for illegal or harmful purposes.
Please also be mindful of your fellow subscribers and treat them with the respect and courtesy they deserve.
If we discover that you have been abusing the Bulletin Board we reserve the right to remove your access to our site
cynic
- 13 Oct 2008 16:21
- 113 of 288
ok guys .... let's put the handbags away ...... clearly both tabby and de facto scotty lack any support ..... so tabby, now that you have said your piece, to which no one else subscribes, pipe down before you get too aerated
ptholden
- 13 Oct 2008 16:27
- 114 of 288
Mike
I'm embarrassed at the behaviour of Tabasco, can I be banned please in accordance with your T&Cs??
Yours in harassed anticipation.
pth