Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • ...
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6

Info required for report to FSA re Stanelco (SEO)     

greekman - 07 Jun 2007 07:28

Please post Date, Time, Heading of any news released in any official format by Stanelco than you deem relevant to above proposed report.

Thanks in anticipation.

Greekman.

lostalot - 29 Feb 2008 17:46 - 97 of 101

Greekman...do you have an email address ?

I would like to discuss something with you?

greekman - 01 Mar 2008 17:52 - 98 of 101

lostalot,

Got your E-Mail via the MoneyAm messenger yesterday but can't reply same way as from 1st March (today) no longer Level 2.
But you can contact me via tradavanmar@hotmail.com. Hols from 6th march though.

regards Dave (greekman)

greekman - 17 Jul 2008 10:13 - 99 of 101

The Daily Telegraph reported today that the LSE has come under fire for refusing to name 4 AIM companies that it has fined a total of 170,000.
These breaches varied from
1 Misleading and unrealistically optimistic statements.
2 Delaying the publication of price sensitive information by up to two months.
3 Omitting material facts.
All I feel are serious enough offenses for these companies to be named. As it stands I/You may have shares in these companies, and have been mislead.
As many will remember, the FSA informed me that if my complaint against Stanelco resulted in a penalty that was not deemed a Public Censure then I would receive No update.
It looks as if the LSE are as open as the FSA are. Decisions such as these make companies less likely to be open with their shareholders.
I appreciate SEO are not on the AIM but I'm sure the treat shareholders like mushrooms is relevant to the main markets and AIM equally.

hangon - 25 Jul 2008 16:36 - 100 of 101

nothing to do with SEO...as you say they are on the Main MArket, but one wonders - for how long - they must be a blight/tarnish there and maybe nudged out.

FSA fines - are a sad joke, IMHO - since a "fine" is not directed to the wrongdoer ( ie Management, who collect bonus fees etc.) - but the Shareholders whose dividend is cut as a result.

If shareholders are fined for the wrongdoing of their shares - then shareholders need at least twice the power thay have at present. The ability to set the AGM-agenda and maybe forced rotation of Execs that cannot show their performance is well above average. AGM Time and Place.

And so on. Indeed shareholders would ppear to be better "regulators", since any bad outcome directly affects their investment...

greekman - 25 Jul 2008 17:24 - 101 of 101

And up 25.49% on the day with as yet no justifiable reason. If there is such a reason then someones in the know, or it could be similar to the last 3 such rises, whereas the sp steadily drops over the coming days/weeks.
If course I'm not suggesting the possibility of someone chasing up the price in order to start the shorting merry go round again. Perish the thought.
Whatever is happening we (PI's) will be the last to know.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • ...
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Register now or login to post to this thread.