Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

new millennium resources (NML)     

LEEWINK - 28 Mar 2004 15:45

NML is due its interrim results now, last year it was the 28th of this month.

They are setting up a new site to explore/research/analyse and all the equipment to do this should be on site now, and drilling should start soon, all this extra news should be covered in the interims.

does anyone have any further positive views on this company ??

mjr1234 - 22 Jun 2005 15:56 - 974 of 1909

Don't think so GayBriefs,

Can only buy 7.5k on Comdirect, can sell over 1M@3.25p!

Looks like a "mystery buyer" may be around?

Andy - 22 Jun 2005 16:35 - 975 of 1909

mjr1234,

I have just checked, and they are showing a maximum of 75,000 at 3p bid!

Andy - 22 Jun 2005 16:42 - 976 of 1909

mjtr1234,

you are right about the buy limit, which is only 28,000, interesting!

mjr1234 - 22 Jun 2005 16:54 - 977 of 1909

LOL, I meant 3.25p - edited the post.

Andy - 22 Jun 2005 17:25 - 978 of 1909

ok :-)

The buy limit of 28,000 certainly is interesting, RNS coming perhaps?

mjr1234 - 22 Jun 2005 17:45 - 979 of 1909

Strange how you got 75k sell limit though.

My broker has had a buy limit of 7500 shares all afternoon!

mjr1234 - 23 Jun 2005 12:56 - 980 of 1909

Moving up!

mjr1234 - 23 Jun 2005 13:19 - 981 of 1909

GRRRRRRRR! There goes sub-4p prices, and I was going to top up tommorrow.

GRRRRRRRR!

legend290782 - 23 Jun 2005 13:39 - 982 of 1909

DON'T DO THAT

ASMITH2 - 23 Jun 2005 13:40 - 983 of 1909

Dont worry as soon as the seller realises they can sell again at a profit sub 4p ere we come.!

mjr1234 - 23 Jun 2005 13:48 - 984 of 1909

DON'T DO WHAT?

ASMITH2 - 23 Jun 2005 14:12 - 985 of 1909

Shout about the price rise youll wake up that dreaded seller again!

mjr1234 - 23 Jun 2005 14:14 - 986 of 1909

Good lets flush him out?

PS Can only buy 5k@3.96p!?

ASMITH2 - 23 Jun 2005 14:20 - 987 of 1909

Some decent buys from here before the news could flush him out fwiw I think the seller is the bank Al Wakah or whatever it is.
The bank would not be aware of the current situation that news of profit forcasts are imminent.

Wendy D - 23 Jun 2005 14:32 - 988 of 1909

Why do you think that Al Wakalah are selling, ASMITH2?

Andy - 23 Jun 2005 14:32 - 989 of 1909

Asmith2,

Surely the bank would be in touch with the company?

ASMITH2 - 23 Jun 2005 14:53 - 990 of 1909

>Andy

Exactly they should have told nml who should have notified the market what we do know is we are missing some rns on notifiable holdings.What we dont know at the moment is who is at fault although that should soon be cleared up after AIM have conducted the investigation.

>Wendy D

I think its the bank because a bank would liquidate its holding at market price if it had decided to do this.An investor would be more aware of market conditions and of newsflow to come in this case the profit forcasts and imo would not be selling out at this level ahead of price sensitive news that could very well see this double from here.A bank would not be aware that nml are to make these predictions imminently and may be selling to balance its books irrespective of the price.Banks dont like risk or losing money!

Anomalous1 - 23 Jun 2005 15:15 - 991 of 1909

>ASmith2

From your posts, most people would think that you are me posting another identity. Can you please confirm to the others that you are not Anomalous. We may share the same views, but it appears that the others are so paranoid that they think I am using multiple IDs!!!


By the way, I don't think it is Al-Wakalah selling, but I can't be certain. You see, Al-Wakalah Nominees is owned by Datuk Fung-Chee Lim. Although I must admitt that he only disclosed an interest in 13,333,333:

Further to the trading statement of 20 January 2005 the conversion of US$1.25 million loan notes into 16,666,667 ordinary shares at US$0.075 (4p) resulted in Al-Wakalah Nominees holding 13,333,333 million ordinary shares representing 8.06 per cent. of the Company's issued share capital.

http://www.uk-wire.com/cgi-bin/articles/200504221407014182L.html

So that leaves the other 3,333,334 shares (an undisclosable amount) that could have been sold. The trouble is that the quantity 'ditched' by the mystery seller is far in excess of 3,333,334. I still think that the seller is one of the 3.7p placees, because of the selling behaviour. Stopping the moment the bid gets below the purchase price.

The MMs only move the price further south when they still have a few left out of the tranche/batch that they have orders to sell. So long as notready et-al keep soaking them up, they will keep dumping them.

Whilst I disagree with VV's analysis, that the MMs are out to drive the price down, it does appear that the mystery seller is primed to take advantage the moment the good news is announced and spoil the party for the regular PIs on this BB and ADVFNs.

ASMITH2 - 23 Jun 2005 15:31 - 992 of 1909

>Anomalous1

Hi,Just to confirm to this bb that I am not Anomalous I dont know who Anomalous is and have never met him / her.
Although I do share exactly the same views of nml as Anomalous.

Kind Regards
ASMITH2

stockdog - 23 Jun 2005 15:42 - 993 of 1909

ASMITH2 - Pleased to hear you know who you are and who you are not - always a useful guide to personal relationships!

Albeit you sahre views with Anomalous - it's the way you tell'em in plain, polite English which holds the attention.

Could you confirm (re your post 989) is there an AIM investigation in progress or are you surmising there might/should be? If there is, I need do nothing. If there isn't, I have unanswered correspondence with the John Cross and house-broker Daniel Stewart that I am minded to refer to LSE for review.

If the bank (as you suppose) has liquidated its holding, do you imagine this is the end of the recent regular selling and that the SP might now find a more natural level?

Thanks

sd
Register now or login to post to this thread.