bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
shamona
- 21 Sep 2005 13:52
- 9750 of 27111
????? The 200 ma IS beginning to move down!
superrod
- 21 Sep 2005 13:56
- 9751 of 27111
haystack
you miss my point.
EVERY SHARE has the likes of you with no monetary interest. WHY?
if you are wrong you are forgotten.
if you are right you are condemded forever on the bbs as a nose rubbing, sh*t stirring arseh*le who can see the outcome but doesnt go long or short ) even though you KNOW you are right )..
do you really think you will get elevated to the dizzy height of share guru by gleefully telling punters ( a lot who may be wiped out by a bad RNS ) that you were right?
have some humanity man ( i assume ). ive been trading 15 years and seen it all. houses lost,marriages lost,money lost. ive lost 50k in a year and made 50k in a year.its fun.......but toerags like you seem to thrive on the misfortune of others.
be right by all means, but spare a thought for your fellow man ( who obviously isnt as well equipped as you to be a city high flier ).
rant over
JUST HAVE SOME HUMANITY.
superrod
- 21 Sep 2005 14:07
- 9752 of 27111
oops
that last post should have been on the EVS thread.
carl1965
- 21 Sep 2005 14:07
- 9753 of 27111
Er, I think this has been posted on the wrong thread, if not what number post are you referring to?
Oilywag
- 21 Sep 2005 14:08
- 9754 of 27111
Superrod
I agree with the sentiments of your post above.
The oily one
Snip
- 21 Sep 2005 14:20
- 9755 of 27111
testing the 200 ma for resistance. Watch the volume
bhunt1910
- 21 Sep 2005 14:25
- 9756 of 27111
Now 1:6 @17.5 v 17.75 and 50k v 540k - its going to come back .25
baza
shamona
- 21 Sep 2005 14:41
- 9757 of 27111
Wonder who fits that bill here?
http://www.fool.co.uk/news/comment/2005/c050919c.htm
By David Kuo ( TMFDragon)
09/19/2005
A group of eminent American academics suggests that "functional psychopaths" tend to be better stock market investors. Researchers from Stanford Graduate School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Iowa concluded that people with brain damage that caused them to suppress emotions significantly outperformed those with fully functioning feelings.
jimmy b
- 21 Sep 2005 14:57
- 9758 of 27111
Driver ,,Wilbs ,,Bos ,,you lot seem to have a lot of cash .mmm..
bhunt1910
- 21 Sep 2005 15:24
- 9759 of 27111
Interesting - I just tried to buy 100k through Barclays and they would not quote. The maximum (which I did not buy) was 50,000 - even though the nms is showing as 100,000.
Why do you suppose that is ??
baza
bhunt1910
- 21 Sep 2005 15:27
- 9760 of 27111
Now showing 1v1 at 17.25 v 17.50 and 55k v 10k
bhunt1910
- 21 Sep 2005 15:33
- 9761 of 27111
Thats more like it - a bit of support at 17.25
now 2:6 at 17.25 v 17.75 and 555k v 596k
bhunt1910
- 21 Sep 2005 15:36
- 9762 of 27111
now moving faster than I can keep up - a recovery?
baza
bhunt1910
- 21 Sep 2005 15:40
- 9763 of 27111
Looks like there coud be a tick up on the oiffer to 18.25
Now 3:1 @ 17.75 to 18 and 225k to 40k
bhunt1910
- 21 Sep 2005 15:47
- 9764 of 27111
I expect the price will retreat a little now as all the day traders pull out having made a nice little profit from this morning
Baza
shamona
- 21 Sep 2005 15:55
- 9765 of 27111
I don't think so, looks like a bot's at work to me; every drop off being picked up with large buys going through automaticaly.
bhunt1910
- 21 Sep 2005 16:00
- 9766 of 27111
I bow to your greater knowledge Shamoner - I am but a novice at this game - and I hope you are right
baza
bhunt1910
- 21 Sep 2005 16:01
- 9767 of 27111
ps whats a bots?
Snip
- 21 Sep 2005 16:12
- 9768 of 27111
buying or selling a large amount in small bits so that the market isn`t spooked
elrico
- 21 Sep 2005 16:14
- 9769 of 27111
qc:
Looks like one muddy Lemmings piece has scared the sh*t out of a lot of impatient people.
There is nothing muddy about our research. Our commentary was quite bullish for SEO`s long term prospects. However, we did note there was an area of confusion, which needed clarity.
It is our policy to report with honesty and clarity - warts and all. We do not attempt to paper over the cracks, or hype the facts. Its not ethical, regardless of our position.
Does the following pertain the title of accurate reporting?
Extracts from a 6 page report on lemming Investor 16 Sept `05
SEO arguably remains one of the most interesting of probable future giants of the LSE,
though it is still at a very early stage, and only just turning commercial.
It carries very high risk until the adoption of Greenseal by ASDA and its suppliers is
assured. Investment in the company is thus still entirely speculative and cannot yet be
based on any reputable forecast.
Nevertheless the current cap of 172m has so far run ahead of itself as to represent a very
high risk in the short term. The company will be lucky to reach 2m turnover for the year
ending 31 October, and if it does so, may just breakeven. To make the minimum 5m
annual profit to justify the current cap Stanelco will need to install at least 100 of the 200
sealing machines nominally contracted for ASDA.
End
I can not offer greater insight to what was report, as this would remove the benefit of subscribing - a point already laboured by one subscriber on this thread. A valid point. Nevertheless, I felt the need to clarify the issue you raised.
I hope I have removed the trees from your line of vision.
Kind regards
Elric