for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Now 1:6 @17.5 v 17.75 and 50k v 540k - its going to come back .25

baza

Wonder who fits that bill here?

http://www.fool.co.uk/news/comment/2005/c050919c.htm

By David Kuo ( TMFDragon)
09/19/2005


A group of eminent American academics suggests that "functional psychopaths" tend to be better stock market investors. Researchers from Stanford Graduate School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Iowa concluded that people with brain damage that caused them to suppress emotions significantly outperformed those with fully functioning feelings.

Driver ,,Wilbs ,,Bos ,,you lot seem to have a lot of cash .mmm..

Interesting - I just tried to buy 100k through Barclays and they would not quote. The maximum (which I did not buy) was 50,000 - even though the nms is showing as 100,000.

Why do you suppose that is ??

baza

Now showing 1v1 at 17.25 v 17.50 and 55k v 10k

Thats more like it - a bit of support at 17.25
now 2:6 at 17.25 v 17.75 and 555k v 596k

now moving faster than I can keep up - a recovery?

baza

Looks like there coud be a tick up on the oiffer to 18.25
Now 3:1 @ 17.75 to 18 and 225k to 40k

I expect the price will retreat a little now as all the day traders pull out having made a nice little profit from this morning

Baza

I don't think so, looks like a bot's at work to me; every drop off being picked up with large buys going through automaticaly.

I bow to your greater knowledge Shamoner - I am but a novice at this game - and I hope you are right

baza

ps whats a bots?

buying or selling a large amount in small bits so that the market isn`t spooked

qc:

Looks like one muddy Lemmings piece has scared the sh*t out of a lot of impatient people.
There is nothing muddy about our research. Our commentary was quite bullish for SEO`s long term prospects. However, we did note there was an area of confusion, which needed clarity.

It is our policy to report with honesty and clarity - warts and all. We do not attempt to paper over the cracks, or hype the facts. Its not ethical, regardless of our position.

Does the following pertain the title of accurate reporting?

Extracts from a 6 page report on lemming Investor 16 Sept `05

SEO arguably remains one of the most interesting of probable future giants of the LSE,
though it is still at a very early stage, and only just turning commercial.
It carries very high risk until the adoption of Greenseal by ASDA and its suppliers is
assured. Investment in the company is thus still entirely speculative and cannot yet be
based on any reputable forecast.

Nevertheless the current cap of 172m has so far run ahead of itself as to represent a very
high risk in the short term. The company will be lucky to reach 2m turnover for the year
ending 31 October, and if it does so, may just breakeven. To make the minimum 5m
annual profit to justify the current cap Stanelco will need to install at least 100 of the 200
sealing machines nominally contracted for ASDA.

End

I can not offer greater insight to what was report, as this would remove the benefit of subscribing - a point already laboured by one subscriber on this thread. A valid point. Nevertheless, I felt the need to clarify the issue you raised.

I hope I have removed the trees from your line of vision.

Kind regards

Elric

Good call by the looks of it Bhunt, well done.

shamona -

It is clear you have not read our report. There are no scare tactics, just good honest reporting of the facts. We have had no complaints about our reporting from subscribers thus far. You should take up your complaint with Tim Dolan of the FSA. Mr Dolan is well aware of us. He has in fact offered us advice in the past.

Read our disclaimer http://lemminginvestor.com/Disclaimer.html
we do not hide the fact we are not regulated. Indeed, what is regulation? www.t1ps.com have staff on their books working as editors/analysts, (one of which used to work for us) they are no more qualified than we are. Yet they are regulated. Why? Because they have the cash resources.......simple, we are not allowed to use the Queen`s English. i.e: Buy, sell or hold, etc. We have chosen not to pay the FSA for the privilege. This we believe, removes uncertainty.

Is moneyAm regulated?

Do you think it should?


Tim Dolan
Enforcement Division
Financial Services Authority
25 The North Colonnade
Canary Wharf
London
E14 5HS
Tel: +44 (0)207 0665840
Fax: +44 (0)207 0665841
Email: "mailto:tim.dolan@fsa.gov.uk"

Tell that to the judge!

"Tell that to the judge!"

There is no need my friend, unless you have better advisors than we do.
I see no mileage in debating with an empty head.

You should be paying more attention to your own antics on this thread and others. Your behaviour has not exactly be exemplary has it. Your double standards are astonishing.

Topic is now closed:-)))

Elric

Hi All,

My chart in post 9749 is looking perfect now for a rise back to 20p+, and my prediction of yesterday that it would bounce, rather than the doom mongers 10p/4p/2p drivel, is again shown in the closing price.

2, maybe 3 trading days for 20p, looking at the time taken for the previous rises to hit the 50 M.A.

Any traders buying now will make a measily 10% over the next 3 days, if they stay that long, I will wait 3 to 5 years for 20+, that will give me 40,000% profit on my purchase at the current circa 5p average, whereas traders making 10% every 3 days would need a lot more than my 3 to 5 years to make that much profit, even on the compound gain of 10% per 3 days, and I have the added bonus of very nice dividends along the way .... ROTFLMAO at traders :))))

Cheers,
PM

PAUL, any chance of replying to the email i sent you to your site?

cheers
rgds
PT