Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

The more intelligent     

driver - 05 Aug 2005 22:26

This thread is for the more intelligent, any intelligent thoughts can be posted here by the more intelligent amongst us.
The thread is dedicated to bosley (bos) who only wants the more intelligent thoughts posted here.

Imagination is more important than knowledge; Einstein

bosley - 08 Aug 2005 19:11 - 98 of 245

i think, therefore i am..... a thinker. but nobody calls me a thinker.
i build walls ,.........i'm a builder. but nobody calls me a builder.
i make furniture......i'm a carpenter . but nobody calls me a carpenter.
i paint ceilings.........i'm a painter. but nobody calls me a painter.

i shag just one sheep.........

jimmy b - 08 Aug 2005 19:38 - 99 of 245

You might think that New Zealand has the most sheep per capita in the world, but here's a fact to turn alan and bosley green with envy.
While New Zealand only boasts 20 sheep per person, the lucky lads on the Falkland Isles, with over 700,000 sheep to 2,000 people get 350 each!

DocProc - 08 Aug 2005 19:39 - 100 of 245

If you were to leave the earth on a ship going near the speed of light, time would go slower for you. Meanwhile, much more time would have passed on earth, and by the time you got back, perhaps everyone you knew when you left would be dead.

Q 1. According to the Theory of Relativity, wouldn't it be impossible to designate which was going fast, the earth or the ship? In that case wouldn't both people on the planet and those on the ship be able to claim they were the ones travelling fast and the other would be stationary?

Q 2. And, in a similar way, couldn't you assume the ship has stayed stationary and it was the earth that sped away at the speed of light and eventually came back to the ship?

Q 3. If you make it sorta kinda 50/50 and each leave the other a the speed of light, wouldn't these things cancel each other out and neither would age?

driver - 08 Aug 2005 19:40 - 101 of 245

jimmy
No comment on the pic then?

jimmy b - 08 Aug 2005 19:42 - 102 of 245

It looks just like me !

driver - 08 Aug 2005 19:45 - 103 of 245

jimmy
Thats good I thought you might be offended.

driver - 08 Aug 2005 19:54 - 104 of 245

Boss, second job.

namreh3 - 08 Aug 2005 19:55 - 105 of 245

Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. oops.

Nam

jimmy b - 08 Aug 2005 21:17 - 106 of 245



Offended, by you driver ,,never

bosley - 09 Aug 2005 08:49 - 107 of 245

driver, re post 104. that's a little too close. has someone been whispering in your ear?

driver - 09 Aug 2005 09:01 - 108 of 245

bos
My spies are everywhere.

driver - 09 Aug 2005 11:34 - 109 of 245

There may be a lot of life in the universe. If so, its a safe bet that most of it will score lower on the SATs than you.
Just consider the situation on one planet: ours. There are millions of species on Earth. Millions. Among this protoplasmic plentitude, how many species are smart enough to be interesting on the telephone or able to help you with Sundays crossword? Well, theres Homo sapiens, and then theres nobody.

driver - 09 Aug 2005 14:14 - 110 of 245

ZZZZZZZZZZ, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

jimmy b - 09 Aug 2005 14:43 - 111 of 245



There you go driver, he looks intelligent

hewittalan6 - 09 Aug 2005 15:36 - 112 of 245

But he was dyxlexic. What if, when he wrote E=MC2, what he really meant was MC=E2. Modern physics would be knackered!!! Oh yes. Now thats my idea of a fun time!!!!

hewittalan6 - 09 Aug 2005 15:36 - 113 of 245

But he was dyxlexic. What if, when he wrote E=MC2, what he really meant was MC=E2. Modern physics would be knackered!!! Oh yes. Now thats my idea of a fun time!!!!

hewittalan6 - 09 Aug 2005 15:37 - 114 of 245

OOps. Bloody computers on the fritz again. Must be the wrong equation after all, and thats what causes my computer to go wrong.

jimmy b - 09 Aug 2005 15:56 - 115 of 245

Nothnig rong wiht biegn dislexxic alen..

driver - 09 Aug 2005 16:46 - 116 of 245

There may be a lot of life in the universe. Part 2

Is this a momentous fact or not? Is the circumstance that we can look around and find were the brainiest boffins on the planet merely a trivial result of being the first species able to notice? Or is there some reason to think that intelligence is actually a rare and unlikely evolutionary development, and Homo sapiens has lucked out?

This is more than just another good question to bandy about after dinner, between the cigars and the port. It goes right to the heart of our place in the universe. And its also of obvious and critical importance to SETI researchers. After all, were on a fools mission deploying our SETI telescopes if theres no intelligent life out there.

bosley - 09 Aug 2005 18:54 - 117 of 245

why would there be any intelligent life out there? there's none in here.
Register now or login to post to this thread.