Scripophilist
- 27 Oct 2004 23:40

How would you like to trade a market where you get large regular price swings every 10 minutes in the afternoon, seven days a week. A
market where all prices are set purely by supply and demand, few transaction costs, no middle men and you only pay commission if you win? Where you can freely act as a market maker and where you have direct market access and where you can create a spread for others to take?
Betfair has revolutionised the betting market and created an open platform for exchanging risk on sports events. This market is now viewed much more like a traditional financial risk market than an old fashioned betting market. Smart users have realised that there are huge opportunities on Betfair because they can buy and sell risk in much the same way they would in a normal financial market but without the burden of cost or the restricted access that is usually associated with traditional financial markets.
Click here to learn more
Fundamentalist
- 06 Feb 2005 15:52
- 987 of 10502
Hope no one was trying to buy money on southampton at the death
Scripophilist
- 06 Feb 2005 15:54
- 988 of 10502
No, But gutted, we really needed those three points, Desperately. I fear we are nearly doomed we so needed to win that one. It looks like luck will not be with us.
Fundamentalist
- 06 Feb 2005 16:06
- 989 of 10502
Sorry scrip - forgot you were a "saint". Personally think Harry will get you out of trouble, theres plenty of other poor sides to go down
Bones
- 06 Feb 2005 16:10
- 990 of 10502
I will find out more on the course I know, but as a taster, I see the odds on Chelsea winning are 1.32 just before kick off. How are you guys playing that, if you are at all?
Fundamentalist
- 06 Feb 2005 16:24
- 991 of 10502
Bones
personally am just watching at present, if chelsea havent scored getting on for half time and the odds are above 1.6 i will back chelsea and then look to green up if and when they score
Fundamentalist
- 06 Feb 2005 16:28
- 992 of 10502
Chelsea currently looking toothless without Robben
Bones
- 06 Feb 2005 16:37
- 993 of 10502
Thanks Fundamentalist, For the record using small trial sums, I decided to lay Chelsea at 1.32 100 leaving with a max liability of 32 on the basis that Chelsea (no Robben, Drogba) might take time to get going and knowing Man City are the kind of team to do the unexpected.
After 20 mins of midfield play, I decided to green up at 1.5 for safety only for a 12 profit across the outcomes like so:
EDIT: sorry about the gap in the photo!
Of course, an early Chelsea goal would see me down probably 25 straight away if I were to close off. The question for me to find out at the course is whether there was any sense in my play!!!
I look forward to it.
Fundamentalist
- 06 Feb 2005 16:49
- 994 of 10502
Bones
you obviously understand the theories - you will get statistical evidence from scrip as to what strategies you should use.
Well done with your profit, but put into context you risked 32 to win 12 on Chelsea not scoring in the first half hour or so - i am guessing but i think if you had tried that over the season with chelsea home games you would have lost money (they have led after half an hour in more than 1 game in 2.5 i would guess)
Bones
- 06 Feb 2005 16:56
- 995 of 10502
Indeed Fundy! (first 20 mins rather than half hour). I didn't think it stacked up but the absence of key players had some bearing on it.
Nonetheless, it seems similar to, albeit a bit riskier than, the France/Scotland rugby strategy that you all piled on yesterday (so would I had I not been out). So what's the "fundamental" difference?
PS It can wait until the course if you are embargoed on trade secrets :)
kajman
- 06 Feb 2005 17:01
- 996 of 10502
Bones, I'm new to this but think it's just down to the odds. France were 1.06 at the start of the match - a lot better than Chelsea at 1.32
Bones
- 06 Feb 2005 17:04
- 997 of 10502
kajman, I'm sure that is right! You can hardly go wrong laying at 1/16...!
Fundamentalist
- 06 Feb 2005 17:09
- 998 of 10502
Bones
agree with kajman, at 1.06 there was very little risk for a nice reward (i believe you could have had 2.1 at one point)
if chelsea had been 1.06 i would have been laying them too
1.06 prices in an expectation of a very easy win, which in play, would require a lead to be taken very early otherwise the odds will drift
kajman
- 06 Feb 2005 17:15
- 999 of 10502
Shot by kezman, - no relation :-)
Fundamentalist
- 06 Feb 2005 18:02
- 1001 of 10502
Anyone else take a bath on chelesa or just me?
how does calamity james make a save like that lol
Kayak
- 06 Feb 2005 18:02
- 1002 of 10502
Damn, one less sucker in the financials :-))
Bones
- 06 Feb 2005 18:25
- 1004 of 10502
Fundy lol - when are you meant to stop your position in such situations?
bakko
- 06 Feb 2005 18:27
- 1005 of 10502
Fundy, Sorry to hear you got caught out by Chelsea today. Fortunately for me, I pulled off a nice profit by scalping for a draw during the second half and greening up towards the end.
Its a nice result for both ManU and Ars though. But since I've been active with Betfair I'm finding that my loyalties are with my Betfair statement!!
Anyone on the Superbowl tonight?? I only know a little about American football having following it on a casual basis many years ago. But it could provide interesting pickings as the odds tend to chop and change quite violently as both teams pick up momentum on the field. Liquidity looks good too, with over 1m already placed.
Any views on this??
Fundamentalist
- 06 Feb 2005 18:28
- 1006 of 10502
Tough one to call - and as you can see i havent worked it out yet lol.
Scrip - what do you do in this scenario - do you let the loss run or do you stop out after says 10 ticks?