Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect (New Paper by Judy Wood/John Hutchison)
CB_Brooklyn
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread326671/pg1

posted on 13-1-2008 @ 04:38 PM

Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect (New Paper by Judy Wood/John Hutchison)

Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect

by

Judy Wood and John Hutchison

drjudywood.com...


Excerpt:

=======================
In considering how the WTC complex was destroyed, many people have criticised the research posted here because it does not state or describe the exact technology employed.

These pages include data which strongly implicates a class of technology as being one of the main ones used.

The data below seem to strongly tie up with features of what has become known as The Hutchison Effect. The Hutchison Effect actually seems to describe a range of observed characteristics, some of which are listed below. John Hutchison is a Canadian inventor and experimental scientist who has been experimenting with field effects for almost 30 years. There is a great deal of information about him on the internet, and a selection is linked from this set of pages.

The table below lists effects and events seen at or in the vicinity of World Trade Center and compares those with observed characteristics of the Hutchison Effect. Clearly, the posting of this material is quite controversial, but even in the various documentaries that have featured John Hutchison, he has suggested that the techniques he has discovered and developed have been further refined by places like Lockheed Skunkworks, S.A.I.C. (Science Applications International Corp.), and also by perhaps other defense companies.
=======================


My comments: Although still under construction, the new paper gives many clues to the technology that was used to destroy the World Trade Center. Take a look at the many pictures and see for yourself! People can no longer claim that this technology does not exist. It definitely DOES exist!

Also note the two companies mentioned in the excerpt above (Lockheed Martin and SAIC). Both are sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society! The government even contracted with SAIC for the NIST Report.

See the "News" section of Dr Wood's website for upcoming interviews with Andrew Johnson where he will discuss the new paper. Also in the "news" section is a downloadable MP3 of an interview with John Hutchison.
drjudywood.com...


For proof that the 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 "truth movement" were all orchestrated by people associated with directed energy weapons and the media, see my new article:

9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
www.checktheevidence.co.uk...


Also note the two Court Cases in the US District Court, Southern New York, with attorney Jerry Leaphart:

Dr Judy Wood, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that Directed Energy Weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center.
drjudywood.com...

Dr Morgan Reynolds, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that the Media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane hitting the South Tower.
nomoregames.net...


Bottom line... there were NO hijackings on 9/11 and the entire War On Terror is BOGUS!

Even Peter Jennings knew the 9/11 airplane video was fake. Note his nervousness and word fumbling when ABC plays the clip back in slow motion:
www.youtube.com...

As retired Aerospace Engineer Joseph Kieth says: "The video is phony because airliners dont meld into steel and concrete buildings, they crash against them!"
nomoregames.net...


What about the eyewitnesses who say they saw planes hit the towers, you ask? See the following analysis of the WTC Task Force Interviews, which were published in the New York Times. You'll learn that only a very small percentage of the First Responders reported seeing airplanes hit the towers. Even fewer reported hearing them. But... they had no trouble hearing the fighter jets later on! Whatever they saw "hit" the towers was a projection:

Going in Search of Planes in NYC
www.checktheevidence.co.uk...


What about the airplane wreckage, you ask? Well, first of all, there are NO verified airplane parts. (The government refuses to release any.) And second, when an airplane crashes into a building, the engines are not going to wind up underneath scaffolding:
i18.photobucket.com...

See here for more:
nomoregames.net...


What about the cell phone calls, you ask? Faked using advanced voice synthesizer technology as reported in the Washington Post two and a half years before 9/11:
www.washingtonpost.com...



There were NO hijackings on 9/11.

There were NO plane crashes on 9/11.

The entire War On Terror is BOGUS.

Andrew Johnson/Judy Wood on TV exposing 911

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7438627977642539647

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WTC Destruction and the Hutchison Effect Close
2You need to upgrade your Flash Player2
http://

I heard the Tweenies were behind it.

Nah - sure some scouser said it was the twirlies.

Was that before or after he nicked your car ?

Yes, lets make a joke about it eh lads - better than putting your head in the sand as it doesn't mess with your hair.

That's the Dunkirk spirit.

The joke is maestro .... and chocco gets upset being called a lad.

And my hair's always a mess :o)

Then there were two :)

what are you chatting about secruouser? this is a load of crap, i dont know why the hell people carry on making these bullshit stories up. Can t they do something productive with their lives?!

Yeah thats what Martini told me chocco :-)

the entire war on terror is bogus...here's why
#412199 - 18/01/08 09:38 PM Edit Reply Quote



Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect

by

Judy Wood and John Hutchison

http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/


Excerpt:

=======================
In considering how the WTC complex was destroyed, many people have criticised the research posted here because it does not state or describe the exact technology employed.

These pages include data which strongly implicates a class of technology as being one of the main ones used.

The data below seem to strongly tie up with features of what has become known as "The Hutchison Effect". The Hutchison Effect actually seems to describe a range of observed characteristics, some of which are listed below. John Hutchison is a Canadian inventor and experimental scientist who has been experimenting with "field effects" for almost 30 years. There is a great deal of information about him on the internet, and a selection is linked from this set of pages.

The table below lists effects and events seen at or in the vicinity of World Trade Center and compares those with observed characteristics of the Hutchison Effect. Clearly, the posting of this material is quite controversial, but even in the various documentaries that have featured John Hutchison, he has suggested that the techniques he has discovered and developed have been further refined by places like Lockheed Skunkworks, S.A.I.C. (Science Applications International Corp.), and also by perhaps other defense companies.
=======================


My comments: Although still under construction, the new paper gives many clues to the technology that was used to destroy the World Trade Center. Take a look at the many pictures and see for yourself! People can no longer claim that this technology does not exist. It definitely DOES exist!

Also note the two companies mentioned in the excerpt above (Lockheed Martin and SAIC). Both are sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society! The government even contracted with SAIC for the NIST Report.



Dr Judy Wood & Andrew Johnson on WPFC - We Ourselves 14th Jan 2007 - discuss how it looks as if the WTC was destroyed by some type of technology related to the Hutchison Effect:
Video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...27977642539647
MP3: http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/au...Jan%202007.mp3


See the "News" section of Dr Wood's website for more interviews, including one with John Hutchison.
http://drjudywood.com/#news


For proof that the 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 "truth movement" were all orchestrated by people associated with directed energy weapons and the media, see my new article:

9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cm...=151&Itemid=60


Also note the two Court Cases in the US District Court, Southern New York, with attorney Jerry Leaphart:

Dr Judy Wood, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that Directed Energy Weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Dr Morgan Reynolds, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that the Media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane hitting the South Tower.
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?pag...1=federal_case


Bottom line... there were NO hijackings on 9/11 and the entire War On Terror is BOGUS!

Even Peter Jennings knew the 9/11 airplane video was fake. Note his nervousness and word fumbling when ABC plays the clip back in slow motion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCDu2V3yjS4

As retired Aerospace Engineer Joseph Kieth says: "The video is phony because airliners dont meld into steel and concrete buildings, they crash against them!"
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?pag...planer_resigns


What about the eyewitnesses who say they saw planes hit the towers, you ask? See the following analysis of the WTC Task Force Interviews, which were published in the New York Times. You'll learn that only a very small percentage of the First Responders reported seeing airplanes hit the towers. Even fewer reported hearing them. But... they had no trouble hearing the fighter jets later on! Whatever they saw "hit" the towers was a projection:

Going in Search of Planes in NYC
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cm...=134&Itemid=60


What about the airplane wreckage, you ask? Well, first of all, there are NO verified airplane parts. (The government refuses to release any.) And second, when an airplane crashes into a building, the engines are not going to wind up underneath scaffolding:
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...230806wtc7.jpg

See here for more:
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?pag...with_jones#NBB


What about the cell phone calls, you ask? Faked using advanced voice synthesizer technology as reported in the Washington Post two and a half years before 9/11:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...rkin020199.htm



There were NO hijackings on 9/11.

There were NO plane crashes on 9/11.

The entire War On Terror is BOGUS.

Post Extras:

masonfree



Reged: 18/10/04
Posts: 330
Re: the entire war on terror is bogus...here's why [Re: masonfree]
#412201 - 18/01/08 11:23 PM Edit Reply Quote



http://www.weourselves.org/wpfw/011408.html

http://www.weourselves.org/wpfw/011408.html

Do you believe in fairies at the bottom of the garden too maestro ????

this is ridiculous maestro - what happened to the plane that didnt hit the fucking tower then ? All the passengers just decided to go and live somewhere else and never be seen or heard of again? No they were killed so stop being a prick and stop posting your deluded fantasies.

yes they were probably killed but somewhere else...no planes,no wreckage,no black boxes,no bodies..just one muslim passport...jeez and you all fall for that bollox...use ya FRIGGIN BRAIN CELL!!

The irony, oh the irony :)

IRON?..theres another lie...shipped off to china my ass!

hope i'm not upsetting you all..blame advfn for banning me

How could you upset anyone? I can never stop laughing whenever you post, best entertainment value on this BB :)

pt..you won't be saying that when the nazi police state snuffs you out