ringos_tar_2000
- 11 May 2004 12:22
Anyone notice the exratordinary volumes yesterday? (10/5/2004)
48 million!!!
Many more buys than sells.
That and the price held out only losing a fraction of a penny.
No Easter Eggs in sight in my local store.
May be one reason but............
Any ideas people?
seawallwalker
- 04 Jan 2005 17:35
- 181 of 344
cripes, I did not think it would get there 125 mil!
dave, are you sure you can be quiet for 3 minutes tomorrow?
I have a feeling that would be a first!
seawallwalker
- 04 Jan 2005 17:44
- 182 of 344
Worst figures have to be Sainsbury.
My local store was like a normal day this year on the run up to Christmas.
M & S will be close behind, they had nothing worth buying for me or my family, and they must be desparate to do a half price sale so soon after their pre Christmas sale.
Next looked very busy yet again before and after.......... don't know what the appeal is there though!
daves dazzlers
- 04 Jan 2005 19:24
- 183 of 344
Sw,its the thrill of the retail sector,,my tills are full up and its been a great day.
daves dazzlers
- 06 Jan 2005 08:44
- 184 of 344
Still a watching and a waiting.
daves dazzlers
- 07 Jan 2005 17:51
- 185 of 344
Still a watching but not going to jump on the woolworths wagon yet.
seawallwalker
- 07 Jan 2005 18:33
- 186 of 344
Nor am I having liquidated before the drop, thanbk you footfall for the good info..
I will go on your 36 or less quote.
I have bought into UK's answer to Walmart. AKA Tesco. Long term hold and forget!
stockbunny
- 09 Jan 2005 10:53
- 187 of 344
Good luck on Tesco SWW!!
:>)
seawallwalker
- 09 Jan 2005 13:46
- 188 of 344
Its only a short term long hld, I really want back in these, but with a trading statement this week from tesco, I expect a climb otherwise I would not bither.
Not sure wether to wait till after divi on wlw, to see how it looks then. There is a lot of support for WLW that is for sure or they would have dropped further.
I see my local brach is half price eveything at the moment.
Clear the sheleves and start again.
Good idea.
seawallwalker
- 23 Jan 2005 18:49
- 189 of 344
Sunday Express
Woolworths has been forced to cut jobs after tough trading in what has been described as the worst Christmas in a decade
Oh dear 35p may be too high then?
Lets hope not.
daves dazzlers
- 27 Jan 2005 15:41
- 190 of 344
Going like a chad valley train set today,,choo choo.
stockbunny
- 27 Jan 2005 16:07
- 191 of 344
Hmmmmmm I'm getting bored holding WLW now.....contemplating
bailing out :>(
stockbunny
- 27 Jan 2005 16:16
- 192 of 344
Ok OK what's occurring?????
Now up 2p....
Is it like the car, you know whenever you get so pi**ed off with it
you say you're going to sell it, it stops playing up????
babykitcat
- 27 Jan 2005 16:19
- 193 of 344
take over with a bit of luck ONLY JOKING WE WISH notice there are more sell than buys
stockbunny
- 27 Jan 2005 16:23
- 194 of 344
It's all too bizarre!!
:>)
daves dazzlers
- 27 Jan 2005 16:27
- 195 of 344
Are woolworths a target,i dont think so,talk on 20pence a few days ago.
stockbunny
- 27 Jan 2005 16:43
- 196 of 344
20 PENCE!!!!!!
:>(
seawallwalker
- 27 Jan 2005 16:52
- 197 of 344
Yes.
20 pence.
They are always a target though, so hold on tight!
Maybe someone is stalking them and there are lose rumours.
Something will show up if that's the case.
babykitcat
- 27 Jan 2005 16:59
- 198 of 344
WOULD BE NICE AS THE RETIAL SECTION IS VERY VULNERABLE AT THIS TIME BUT SOME HOW I THINK MR GREEN HAS SENCE!! ONLY TIME WILL TELL BUT YES THEY HAVE BEEN RISING WITH NO NEWS POSTED
daves dazzlers
- 27 Jan 2005 17:05
- 199 of 344
And good volume dont have a position on wlw but more than watchful,goodluck all.
babykitcat
- 28 Jan 2005 00:12
- 200 of 344
ok looks good just found this dated TODAY 28/1/05........
But the sessions speculative focus was provided by Woolworths, which rallied to its best level since this months downbeat Christmas trading statement, up 1p at 39p on brisk turnover in 75.7 million shares, or 5 per cent of its outstanding equity. Dealers attributed most of the volume to Goldman Sachs, although it was not clear whether the US investment bank was acting on behalf of its proprietary desk or a client.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,8211-1459833,00.html