Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

HBOS are they worth 49p (HBOS)     

mitzy - 15 Sep 2008 11:16

Today they have fallen 22% to a new low of 223p ..are they another Marconi..?

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=HBOS&S

The chart looks like one long suicide note.

Bullshare - 18 Sep 2008 16:53 - 201 of 569

We have heard very little about just how much of a run HBOS had from depositors/savers removing money from their accounts. The photos of Northern Rock customers queuing caused their failure. A man with a camera and some mates outside a B & B branch could cause the same problem!

spitfire43 - 18 Sep 2008 17:02 - 202 of 569

But would the naked shorters and hedge funds stoop that low. Silly question really- (OF COURSE THEY WOULD.)

hewitts - 18 Sep 2008 18:47 - 203 of 569

FSA to ban short-selling of financial stocks

By Peter Thal Larsen, Banking Editor

Published: September 18 2008 17:44 | Last updated: September 18 2008 18:09

Short-selling of financial stocks is to be banned in the United Kingdom from midnight on Thursday night under rules drawn up by the Financial Services Authority.


The ban, which has been approved by the watchdogs board of directors, will prevent investors from creating or adding to short positions in all publicly quoted financial companies. The ban will remain in force until January 19, 2009, when the FSA plans to publish a comprehensive review of short-selling rules.


Bullshare - 18 Sep 2008 18:50 - 204 of 569

so is buying a warrant or option 'put' on a financial a short position?

scotinvestor - 18 Sep 2008 22:45 - 205 of 569

its up to shareholders to approve it......theres a good chance this will be refuted as hbos shows a profit from last results plus it got 4 billion from rights issue and aussie bank is worth up to 3 billion.....plus all the property, corporate etc

scotinvestor - 18 Sep 2008 22:45 - 206 of 569

lol at dil......what has wales EVER done.....erm , nothing

cynic - 19 Sep 2008 07:11 - 207 of 569

scot* .... i would be very surprised indeed if the BoE and the gov't, and even the suits in Brussels, have not already laid it on the line to all the various parties that they accept the deal and like it

Clubman3509 - 19 Sep 2008 09:05 - 208 of 569

Don't know whether to sell my HBOS now while up or to wait to see what Lloyds deal is. Any ideas.

Stan - 19 Sep 2008 09:06 - 209 of 569

Sell. and be safe. imho.

Master RSI - 19 Sep 2008 09:50 - 210 of 569

Philip Falcone - a name that HBOS shareholders should HATE, and maybe something else ......... bring charges
against traders who have sought to damage other companies by spreading false rumours.


From the Telegraph ......

Hedge funds clipped by short-selling ban
As short-selling is banned to protect Britain's banks, Gordon Rayner names the men
who have made millions from the financial crisis

As 70,000 employees of HBOS wonder which of them will still have jobs this time next month, they will no doubt be looking for someone to blame for the extinction of their once great employer.

As the dust settled yesterday on the ruins of Britain's fifth-biggest banking group, there was little doubt as to the immediate cause of their misery - the hedge fund billionaires who have made a killing by playing poker with their livelihoods.

Unlikely as it may have seemed even a week ago, HBOS was unable to withstand a sustained attack on its share price by mavericks who have such huge sums at their disposal that they can destroy major companies almost on a whim.

Take Philip Falcone, whose fund is said to have made 280 million by gambling that HBOS's share price would plunge. Falcone, who has just paid 24 million in cash for a 27-room mansion in New York, has been nicknamed "The Midas of Misery" for his ability to make millions by betting on failing companies.

Falcone makes a convenient pantomime villain at a time when the nation desperately needs a hate figure. He earned a staggering 950 million last year through his hedge fund, Harbinger Capital Partners, while insisting: "It's just money. It doesn't define who I am."

Perhaps not, but as one of the "vulture capitalists" who is said to have helped bring HBOS to its knees, his actions may have defined the lives of thousands of British workers.

Mr Falcone is one of a select band of private fund managers who have made their money through the morally dubious practice of short- selling which, despite involving trading something you don't own, is perfectly legal.

A short-seller will borrow shares from an institutional investor for a fee, agreeing to return them at a set time. The shorter sells the shares to a third party, gambling that the price will drop before they have to buy a similar number of shares to return to the lender on the set date. The difference in the price of the shares is the shorter's profit.

Dodgy as this may sound, short- selling has been going on for hundreds of years, but the obliteration of HBOS - which has been squarely blamed on short- selling - forced the Financial Services Authority to take drastic action last night by banning short- selling of financial stocks.

Hedge fund managers (a hedge fund is a private investment fund offering the possibility of huge returns) control an estimated 2 trillion and their clout is so great that if they gang up against a company they perceive to be weak, there is little anyone can do to stop them bringing the company down.

In the same way that a donkey will become the favourite for a horse race if enough people bet on it, a company's share price will be driven down if shorters sell enough of its stock, regardless of how healthy the company may be.

Of course, short-sellers stand to lose a fortune if share prices go up, so some have been suspected of using dirty tricks to illegally manipulate stock prices by spreading false rumours about the health of a company.

In March, HBOS shares took a sudden dive when an anonymous email was circulated to City traders which said: "We're hearing that tomorrow's Financial Times will write a piece about HBOS. It won't be pretty, likely to focus on 128billion of non-customer liabilities that must be rolled in the next three months. This will raise the spectre of a run on the bank."

The information was made up, but it was enough to wipe 3 billion off the value of HBOS shares before the company could issue a denial. Someone had made a killing.

Although there is no suggestion that anyone illegally manipulated HBOS's share price this time, the FSA was left with no choice but to impose the temporary ban on the practice because of fears that other banks could be toppled.

Hector Sants, the chief executive of the FSA, said short-selling was regarded as "a legitimate investment technique in normal market conditions", but that the "extreme circumstances" of the past week had merited the unprecedented decision. Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman, had earlier described the behaviour of the short-sellers as "shocking" and demanded immediate action by the FSA to rein them in.

But should we really be placing all the blame for the financial meltdown on short-sellers? David Einhorn, the 37-year-old billionaire boss of the hedge fund Greenlight Capital in New York, claimed he was doing a public service by shorting Lehman Brothers stock, because he was exposing the company as overvalued and badly run.

Mr Einhorn, a top-class poker player, is seen by many as little more than a ruthless operator, but there is no shortage of City figures who agree with him.

Ian Morley, chairman of the fund manager Corazon Capital, said: " short-sellers simply expose companies which are overvalued. They don't target companies which are well run and properly priced.

"Rather than blaming short- sellers for what's going on, we should be looking at the chief executives of companies whose bad decisions make their firms vulnerable. Remember, those chief executives are guaranteed a big payoff if things go wrong, but hedge fund managers stand to lose everything if they make a bad call.

"What you have to realise is that the people who are short-selling are also buying other stocks in companies like Tesco in the expectation that they will go up," he said. "These people are investors as well as short-sellers, and if you ban short-selling you will drive away investors and reduce liquidity, which will in turn damage the stability of the financial system."

There is also growing evidence that short-sellers are not the only ones who have been guilty of morally questionable behaviour during this week's banking crisis.

The heads of America's biggest banks were summoned to a meeting last weekend at which they were told that Lehman Brothers was going to be allowed to fail, while Merrill Lynch would be bought by Bank of America. Each agreed to put aside rivalries and make money available for other banks. Then they all went back to work and did the exact opposite, refusing to make inter-bank loans and helping to drag more banks, including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, into trouble.

Many City analysts believe that, regardless of the clampdown on short-selling, it is the banks which need to be subjected to tighter regulation to prevent them becoming vulnerable to the "vultures" in the first place.

One surprisingly candid Mayfair-based hedge fund manager told me: "What has happened in the past two weeks is that the financial system itself has been exposed for the shambles that it really is.

"Banks are allowed to borrow huge amounts of money which mean they are vulnerable when there is an economic downturn. What you have to ask yourself is: if a bank is so important to the nation's financial system that it can't be allowed to fail, why aren't there better regulations in place to prevent them getting into such a mess in the first place? You can't blame the players - it's the game itself which needs fixing. Ultimately, though, perhaps we all share some of the blame for the demise of HBOS, which was hugely exposed to the collapse in house prices.

Mr Morley said: "We've all been guilty to some degree for what's going on. We have taken on huge mortgages to buy properties which have become overpriced and we have racked up debts on credit cards. No one forced us to take on those debts, but we did and now we are seeing the consequences."

Maybe so. But if the hedge fund managers are toasting their latest success in Mayfair's champagne bars tonight, perhaps they'll forgive us if we don't raise a glass to them.

Dil - 19 Sep 2008 10:11 - 211 of 569

Get over it scotty , the Bank of Scotland name is about to become extinct and all the head office jobs are heading south.



janetbennison - 19 Sep 2008 10:59 - 212 of 569

does anyone know what date the hbos shares change over to the new ones?

Clubman3509 - 19 Sep 2008 11:06 - 213 of 569

Sold mine at 251 as the saying goes a bird in the hand is worth two up the bush

Clubman3509 - 19 Sep 2008 11:08 - 214 of 569

Philip Falcone is a disgrace to the Jewish people

janetbennison - 19 Sep 2008 11:18 - 215 of 569

I paid 2.90 for my shares a while ago so maybe soon I can get out of trouble. It is looking a lot better at the moment proving the hbos do not drop much. Good luck all

scotinvestor - 19 Sep 2008 11:40 - 216 of 569

english tit has brought about demise of a bank that is STILL profitable......as for wales or welsh......lol they must be glad being part of uk just like isle of man, lol

scotinvestor - 19 Sep 2008 11:40 - 217 of 569

falcone should be hung drawn and quartered......preferable on prime time tv so that people make money out of it, lol

scotinvestor - 19 Sep 2008 11:42 - 218 of 569

when is hornby going be put in jail

Falcothou - 19 Sep 2008 11:44 - 219 of 569

The Hunters become the hunted like in First Blood, Stallone's best movie

Dil - 19 Sep 2008 11:44 - 220 of 569

Yes we are glad to be part of the UK and they can carry on subsidising as long as they want to scotty.

I do hope you get the independence you sooo long for cos by the time it happens the only oil left will be in the Irish Sea.
Register now or login to post to this thread.