Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

BP are they worth 350p (BP)     

mitzy - 25 May 2010 08:48

The oil rig disaster in the Gulf of Mexico has damaged BP's reputation will they manage to avoid a share collapse to 350p.?

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=BP.&Si

472p to buy this morning.

skinny - 16 Jun 2010 13:25 - 201 of 1170

Quite! - Nothing less than you would expect from them sadly!

cynic - 16 Jun 2010 13:32 - 202 of 1170

quite right hali; i allowed myself to get sidetracked

don't agree with you about accounts being qualified, because just as BP cannot quantify the claim against it, not can anyone else ..... alll that BP can do is make what feels like prudent provision, though you can guarantee that will be nothing like enough

as for the institutions, they are effectively obligated to hold BP for all sorts of pretty obvious reasons

halifax - 16 Jun 2010 13:45 - 203 of 1170

cynic cannot agree auditors sign off company accounts for the benefit of shareholders if they feel the accounts understate potential liabilities they will qualify the accounts they do not need to quantify potential liabilities.Institutions are not all obliged to hold BP shares unless they invest in FTSE constituent shares, if BP stops paying a dividend then many pension funds will look elsewhere for equities with a good yield.

aldwickk - 16 Jun 2010 13:55 - 204 of 1170

Clubman,

Don't forget the Volvo for those tall hats they wear and a street map of Golders Green.

halifax - 16 Jun 2010 14:07 - 205 of 1170

Bank of America has told their traders not to book deals with BP beyond 30th june 2011.

Clubman3509 - 16 Jun 2010 14:12 - 206 of 1170

We used to have lots of them in Manchester but the hoodies, and drug dealers moved in their area's and they left. So hoodies
& dealers do some good.

Here in Thailand they are not tolerated, and would soon be shown the departure door should they, or other groups try to play their race cards as they do in the UK.

cynic - 16 Jun 2010 14:34 - 207 of 1170

oh yawn, big big yawn
aldwickk - i don't squelch but shall choose to ignore the boorishness

hali - interesting snippet, but BoA is not a UK institution .... but why 30th June?

Clubman3509 - 16 Jun 2010 14:39 - 208 of 1170

I could seal the hole in a day. stuff it full with all the **** * ****** then cement them in.

hlyeo98 - 16 Jun 2010 14:52 - 209 of 1170

Obama will be meeting the BP executives today, looks like he will beat the shite out of them.

cynic - 16 Jun 2010 14:55 - 210 of 1170

sp clearly can't make up its mind whether 340 is a support that will support or fail .... odds must surely be on the latter

dandu71 - 16 Jun 2010 15:31 - 211 of 1170

I have to wonder what Obama`s attitude would be like if it was an American oil company that caused this disaster? I`m pretty certain he wouldn`t be hanging them out to dry and would encourage the citizens of the US to stick together at during this unfortunate mistake. He`s new in office so has to be seen to be doing something for the American people but I firmly believe the Americans` attitudes would be different had this been a domestic company.

cynic - 16 Jun 2010 15:39 - 212 of 1170

hypothesis, but i doubt it ... in any case, the public sabre-rattling often has little reflection of what is happening behind closed doors

halifax - 16 Jun 2010 15:44 - 213 of 1170

sp slowly slipping away.

Chris Carson - 16 Jun 2010 16:25 - 214 of 1170

Q"uite glad I was playing golf today, BP. is totally oversold despite doom mongers, the crowd are quite rightly selling, Obama being President is just trying to be Presedential, but he is not stupid (hopefully). Watch this space. The important news is that mighty Spain are trailing 1 - 0 LOL!

cynic - 16 Jun 2010 16:43 - 215 of 1170

ADRs about $30.55 at london close

Clubman3509 - 16 Jun 2010 17:01 - 216 of 1170

Do BP's big donations to Obama matter?

The president has received more in political contributions from BP than any other federal candidate in the last 20 years. Is that fact important?


Obama received significant donations from BP. Should he give them back?

Over the past two decades, President Obama is the number one recipient of campaign donations from the company whose burned-out oil rig is now spewing millions of gallons of petroleum into the Gulf of Mexico, reports Politico. He received $77,051 from BP and its employees during his time in the Senate and while running for president. In total, the firm has given $3.5 milllion to federal candidates over the past 20 years. Is it possible the company has gotten special treatment from Obama, or are its donations not relevant to the spill?

That would explain the delay in responding, then: Now we know why Obama took "so long to respond to the oil spill disaster," says Cassie Fiano at her blog. No doubt they'll say it's just "coincidence that he dragged his feet" when he should have reacted quickly. But now that these donations are public knowledge, BP should prepare to be "thrown under the Obama bus."

cynic - 16 Jun 2010 17:04 - 217 of 1170

BP's donations are irrelevant, or at least i hope they are .... there is certainly no reason why they should be returned ..... more interesting would be to know the politicking that is going on behind the scenes and almost certainly involving both sides of the pond .... it would be nice to think that it was all constructive discussion to determine how best to tackle this disaster, but i fear that is but a naive dream

Clubman3509 - 16 Jun 2010 17:08 - 218 of 1170

Why Does President Barack Hussein Obama hate Louisiana?

In the beginning, the Obama administration tried to take control over the BP Gulf oil spill situation without taking any of the responsibility. The best example of this contradictory stance was seen when the administration was asked if BP had refused to do anything that the Obama administration had told them them to do. The administration swallowed hard and tried to duck that question. Finally they had to answer no. This means that when Obama is pointing fingers at who is the blame for the current mess in the gulf, he needs to be standing in front of a mirror.

When foreign nations offered to help with the spill the Obama administration turned down their offers.

When the state of Louisiana repeatedly requested permission to perform actions to safeguard industries and wild life, the Obama administration either dragged their feet or said no.

The final straw occurred when the Obama administration set up a panel of experts to recommended action on the oil spill. When the Obama administration found itself at odds with the expert panel, Obama operatives lied about the report and the recommendations. The most costly lie that the Obama administration told concerning the report was that all oil drilling needed to be shut down. As a result of this idiotic action thousands of people associated with the oil industries are not working and the oil they would be drilling is not coming into the US.

Moreover, the Obama administration has kicked BP in the teeth so many times that BP shares have lost 60% of their stock market value. Some how the geniuses in the Obama administration have failed to make a simple calculation. If they succeed in destroying BP, who will pay for the clean up? That right. The taxpayers.

So the question arises, does Obama hate Louisiana? Is he punishing the state for having a Republican governor?

We already know that Obama hates the domestic energy industry and capitalism and he is now stomping on them both with both golf cleated feet. Never let a crisis go to waste. Obama promised us skyrocketing energy prices before he was elected president. Is he about to deliver?

cynic - 16 Jun 2010 17:11 - 219 of 1170

from where did you drag the above diatribe? ..... if from an american journalist or publication, then it is almost certainly as balanced and non-partisan as would be the Daily Worker over here when commenting on Margaret Thatcher

Clubman3509 - 16 Jun 2010 17:14 - 220 of 1170

Edited by MoneyAM
Register now or login to post to this thread.