mitzy
- 15 Sep 2008 11:16
Today they have fallen 22% to a new low of 223p ..are they another Marconi..?
The chart looks like one long suicide note.
mitzy
- 30 Sep 2008 12:08
- 281 of 569
Talk that Lloyds are to offer less money for Hbos is undermining the shares today.
StarFrog
- 30 Sep 2008 12:31
- 282 of 569
Where is all this speculative talk/nonsense about a lower offer from Lloyds coming from?
The offer document has already been posted to HBOS shareholders and as far as I am aware, that is a legally binding document. So the offer terms can not be changed.
Please feel free to correct me if I am being naive. LOL
spitfire43
- 30 Sep 2008 12:38
- 283 of 569
The market must have doubts about the takeover happening in it's present form, because with hbos at 123p and lloy at 225p the gap is increasing, and is along way from a fair post takerover price for hbos at about 186p.
cynic
- 30 Sep 2008 12:41
- 284 of 569
phew! one of the very few intelligent moves i have made of late was to sell at 250 the day after after the bid was announced
spitfire43
- 30 Sep 2008 12:50
- 285 of 569
lloy is starting to move into positive territory now, the only bank to do so, there's something happening behind the scenes I believe. See news below.
LONDON, Sept 30 (Reuters) - Shares in HBOS, the UK bank that has accepted a bid from rival Lloyds TSB, fell more than 20 percent on Tuesday amid market talk Lloyds could renegotiate the deal.
By 1030 GMT, Lloyds shares were up 3.3 percent at 224.75 pence, giving its bid a value of 186.5 pence under the recommended offer which will see HBOS investors get 0.83 Lloyds shares for every HBOS share they own.
HBOS shares were down 11 percent at 127.2 pence, having earlier fallen as low as 113 pence.
Both banks declined to comment on the talk of a possible renegotiation, but said they were pressing ahead with the acquisition process.
cynic
- 30 Sep 2008 13:34
- 286 of 569
under the old formula, i calculate that with LLOY at 227 (as now), HBOS would have been valued at 188 ...... HBOS is currently 128, so make of that what you will, always bearing in mind that there will always be something of a discount to cater for the time element involved
Guscavalier
- 30 Sep 2008 13:41
- 287 of 569
Probably a good punt if you are of that way of thinking but, not for me, I will stick with Lloyds. Other factor may be the deal to be struck in the US as to how the debts are to be valued.
cynic
- 30 Sep 2008 13:49
- 288 of 569
damn charts are down here (again!), but came to the conclusion that there was little downside at this price
scotinvestor
- 30 Sep 2008 14:04
- 289 of 569
hi gus
watched politics prog on bbc2.......they had usa economist who reckons deal will be out by thursday.....it takes 2 days to get it through congress as both parties haggle over things. i dont know if anyone watched programme but the economist was very interesting to listen to with regard banks
Clubman3509
- 30 Sep 2008 14:08
- 290 of 569
Offer the no's a free lunch if they vote yes
scotinvestor
- 30 Sep 2008 14:16
- 291 of 569
i reckon mr.bush will get his texan gun out and point it at a few of them
Clubman3509
- 30 Sep 2008 14:19
- 292 of 569
Or send his Saudi mates round to have a word with them.
mysunshine
- 30 Sep 2008 15:48
- 293 of 569
If short selling isn't allowed on Financial Stocks why is Paulson still being allowed to short HBOS? I'm confused.
Regulatory Announcement
Company Paulson & Co. Inc.
TIDM
Headline Short Selling Disclosure- HBOS PLC
Released 15:06 30-Sep-08
Number 7196E15
RNS Number : 7196E
Paulson & Co. Inc.
30 September 2008
TR-4 :
Disclosure of Short Position relating to UK Financial Sector Company
1. Full name of person(s) holding the disclosable short position :Paulson & Co. Inc.
2: Name of the issuer of the relevant securities HBOS PLC
3: Disclosable short position 0.95%
4. Date that disclosable short position was held
29 September 2008
cynic
- 30 Sep 2008 15:52
- 294 of 569
i think they are not forced to close but are obligated (not obliged!) to make daily returns to show position
spitfire43
- 30 Sep 2008 15:53
- 295 of 569
I think you will find that Paulson had been left with a short position somewhat higher when ban was introduced, but managed to buy hbos yesterday, which lowered the position. They also did the same with lloy yesterday.
mysunshine
- 30 Sep 2008 16:01
- 296 of 569
Thanks for replies. I thought all short positions had to be closed on the day it was announced and that no more shorting whatsoever was allowed. So the HBOS shares can still be manipulated down.
I do hope Lloyds can have nothing to do with this. It could be an advantage for them. Of course I am not suggesting anything of the sort.
mitzy
- 30 Sep 2008 16:41
- 297 of 569
another down day if anything Lloyds are looking the best pick of the banks.
spitfire43
- 30 Sep 2008 16:43
- 298 of 569
As I understand it companies that had open short position were not allowed to open any more short position, but were free to close them at any time. So as these position are lowered they are required to report the lower position, so I guess they just took advantage of yesterdays lower prices to lower there exposure.
I believe this is how it works, but I'm happy to be corrected if wrong.
cynic
- 30 Sep 2008 16:47
- 299 of 569
mitzy .... that all depends on this deal between HBOS and LLOY ..... if it stands up on the original terms, then HBOS are ridiculously cheap relative to LLOY
cynic
- 30 Sep 2008 17:19
- 300 of 569
i see that it has been mooted that the deal will be renegotiated to 0.6 instead of 0.83 LLOY shares per HBOS ...... IF that happens to be true AND there is no white knight appearing, then HBOS is priced at approx 10% discount to the offer - generally about right when the time element is built in .... unless LLOY tumbles anew, that makes HBOS quite an attractive and safe punt (or even investment!)