Still Waiting
- 21 Sep 2003 22:33
The chart for this stock says it all.
The company is quickly becoming a real gem in the telematics field, over the last month the co. has announced re-seller contracts which will bring in min. 2m or >30% of last years T/O alone.
The company is already experiencing massive organic growth so the co. should be profitable now following last years 500k loss.
The co. has approx. 6m cash and is in one of the hottest growth areas at the moment.
With a market cap. of 25m this will be re-rated x2/3 minimum within the next 6-12 months IMHO.
MM buys went through on Friday with T/O continuing to build, one to put on your monitor...
blakester
- 25 Nov 2003 10:56
- 321 of 3104
Wow, if the stock does this on a good statement just imagine what it will on a bad one! I'm gutted I didn't sell on Friday...
skids
- 25 Nov 2003 11:13
- 323 of 3104
little women i share your view. This is not a quick buck 10 bagger, but it will progress over the coming months.
ajren
- 25 Nov 2003 11:14
- 324 of 3104
As I said on numerous occassions and please do not think I am being arrogant.
Shares merely go/up down on NOTHING else other than City /Institutional
assessments.Institutions - ref Edmond Jackson and a specific government
regulation - MUST know more financial information BEFORE any private
investors/stockbrokers.Therefore,by the time results are seen by us they are
merely history.Institutions get their info from living in the centre of
the stock market world i.e.the City.
Basically,shares magazines are merely guessing - otherwise they would be
purchasing themselves and becoming BILLIONAIRES ...and then not writing
magazines.
There are exceptions e.g.cms which I was completely wrong about.However,
the Institutions ref Edmond Jackson MUST have known ALL the info before we
did.Therefore,they went up for the ONLY reason i.e.the institutions/City are
assessing the SAME information in different ways.
Also,the institutions cannot invest in companies that might fold up.That is
the ONLY reason I was able to purchase Corus at 8 p-I took a calculated risk
they would get the money.The institutions HAD to wait until it was virtually
certain they would get it rgds ajren
ajren
- 25 Nov 2003 11:19
- 326 of 3104
-10 has gone down to -15
My post above is not an opinion - it is a fact e.g.write to Edmond Jackson
blakester
- 25 Nov 2003 11:21
- 327 of 3104
I'm with ajren, I think i've followed the crowd and am now paying the price...
ckmtang
- 25 Nov 2003 11:21
- 328 of 3104
can`t understand why they keep dropping.... even though have a good report.
ajren
- 25 Nov 2003 11:22
- 329 of 3104
The results are terrible in the context that the forward view is very bad.
ajren
- 25 Nov 2003 11:23
- 331 of 3104
ckmtang : the results are terrible ref above
in_2_art
- 25 Nov 2003 11:26
- 332 of 3104
hi everyone
I've just bought in to this share @ 3.40p, as LW has just said there seems to be a lot of panicing going on!!!
i've done my 'dyor' and this company looks good for the future. 5p by xmas ???
may be/ may be not, but it will come and to me 50% profit in 3 to 4 months sounds alot better then 12 months in the bank earning 3 to 4%.
never trust the MM's. i'm also in CWV and their having a field day with that one... if you like rollcoasters, thats a doosey!!!
sit tight and watch your 's climb north
good luck :o)
blakester
- 25 Nov 2003 11:26
- 333 of 3104
Exactly Ajren, "major markets remain challenging" = very bad
ajren
- 25 Nov 2003 11:31
- 335 of 3104
They did - ref Edmond Jackson + government regulation means they MUST know
before us.It is like a horse race.People close to the trainer will have Inside
information and that becomes reflected in the price i.e.what the ordinary
punter has to pay.However,many people listening to the trainers views will
interpret the info differently i.e.the people that assess it badly will lose
a lot of money.
I repeat that if you do not accept my view then I suggest you write to Edmond
Jackson.Government regulation is a FACT and not my OPINION
blakester
- 25 Nov 2003 11:33
- 336 of 3104
It doesn't matter how much extra stock you hold/pick up Little Woman if it ain't worth the paper its written on...
ajren
- 25 Nov 2003 11:34
- 337 of 3104
I suggest ALL shareholders become acquainted with the government regulations
ajren
- 25 Nov 2003 11:38
- 338 of 3104
They are now -28 almost SOLELY on Institutional dealing.However,I will be
surprised if they do not come up a bit.
ajren
- 25 Nov 2003 11:42
- 340 of 3104
No.I suggest you write to Edmond Jackson/and or the government/regulatory
authority.