Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

MELDEX. Double your money- quicktime. (MDX)     

kitosdad - 12 Dec 2007 16:20

The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=MDX&Si

Dil - 26 Jun 2008 15:01 - 441 of 8631

Cos they'll look like plonkers for not taking it.

scotinvestor - 26 Jun 2008 15:07 - 442 of 8631

but they had more than 2 months of when price was 80p.....so why not mention it then....esp when bm pulled out....sp was still decent price then....but mdx said nothing.
thats the strange thing....its like secret service

Dil - 26 Jun 2008 15:09 - 443 of 8631

FIGHT FIGHT !!!!!


LONDON (Thomson Financial) - Pharmaceutical group Meldex International Plc. said shareholder Barry Muncaster has not provided any evidence to support his claim that he holds a 30 percent stake in the company.

The company said it is unclear at this time if Muncaster is acting in concert with certain other shareholders, however, it is making all appropriate and relevant enquiries.

Earlier Thursday, Meldex had said senior independent non-executive director Peter Ibbetson resigned with immediate effect to highlight the unacceptable behaviour from a minority of shareholders.

On Wednesday, Aquisitek Ltd., an acquisition vehicle controlled by Muncaster, had confirmed it has no intention of making an offer for pharmaceutical group Meldex International Plc.

Meldex had rejected an offer from Aquisitek in February, saying the proposal significantly undervalued the company.

Dil - 26 Jun 2008 15:16 - 444 of 8631

BM doing a great job of bringing down a company he has a large financial interest in.

What a plonker.

littlebert2 - 26 Jun 2008 15:55 - 445 of 8631

If the 'plonker' actually has got access to 30%, there is nothing to stop him 'loaning' them out to short positions, driving down the price, helping to remove the board, then closing those positions to drive the price back to where it should be - but with him (or a puppet!) in charge.... not so daft really, is he?

Dil - 26 Jun 2008 16:20 - 446 of 8631

Isn't that a bit dodgy while being involved in a takeover offer ? That would make him even stupider than I gave him credit for.

And didn't BM manage to run the price down from a much higer level to an even lower level when he was in charge ?

scotinvestor - 26 Jun 2008 16:53 - 447 of 8631

yes, bm has a really bad image.....in fact it went to 25p in 2005 i think....and thats when rt too over and started things with melbrusin etc to get mdx out of the poo.

ok, rt has a high salary but he has transformed the company in last 2 years.

and bm has used advfn to get as many big shareholders together.....but i'm sure for his own agenda....anyway he's an old geezer these days so why he doing this.

anyway he's out of position for takeover at present and some of the really big pharmas could take over....mdx will be small change to them.
and i'd love to see bm tell glaxo etc that their strategy is rubbish.....that would be funny.

Dil - 26 Jun 2008 16:56 - 448 of 8631

What name does he uses on advfn ... I'll go revive CAT's binbag thread from when BM was in charge.

halifax - 26 Jun 2008 16:57 - 449 of 8631

Sounds like we are about to get a profits warning.

Dil - 26 Jun 2008 17:01 - 450 of 8631

Be nice for holders if they warned they were going to make one someday !!

scotinvestor - 26 Jun 2008 17:24 - 451 of 8631

what u on about halifax!

u didnt even know there was an offer and that was in feb.....waken up old chap.

now i think u need to go to woolies to sort that out 1st before trying something more secretive like mdx.
jes, james bond ala sean connery would struggle with whats going on.

i want miss.moneypenny though....mmmmm woff woof

tabasco - 27 Jun 2008 08:12 - 452 of 8631

BM or Big Muppet as hes known to his friends has made extraordinary efforts to bully and beat up our company.. That company is obviously worth the vast time and money Mr Muppet has put in. The problem is nobody wants to fight back Ibbetson goes because he is called a few names.
And the front line are fighting with Bows & Arrows against Nuclear. BM was responsible for taking on and KO ing Stanelco.in 04.hes a scrapper that needs knocking outFRED!!!!

Dil - 27 Jun 2008 09:15 - 453 of 8631

lol that must have been one hell of a meeting as a number of resolutions were not passed including the renumeration report re directors.

tabasco - 27 Jun 2008 09:19 - 454 of 8631

Buy/Sell. levels you devils still down 6%

littlebert2 - 27 Jun 2008 09:50 - 455 of 8631

One things for sure - when two sets of people spend so much effort fighting over something, it's a fair bet they know there's something worth fighting over!

Dil - 27 Jun 2008 10:18 - 456 of 8631

Self interest more like.

tabasco - 27 Jun 2008 10:27 - 457 of 8631

. Exactly BertAnd you have a self interest Dilyou can tell your old mate..your safe!!!.. nobody reads these posts.

littlebert2 - 27 Jun 2008 10:29 - 458 of 8631

Suppose I'd kick, bite, lie, and cheat in a fight to keep a 600k pa job - and just as hard to get my hands on a company worth 1+ a share for 30p a share.... :-)

scotinvestor - 27 Jun 2008 10:58 - 459 of 8631

I think the root cause of this farce is that BM did not understand what drives RT and that RT would do everything possible to thwart a takeover at this stage while RT did not understand how investors would react to the long drawn out bid process and to the rejection of all proposals.

It is possible that BM never had enough backing for a realistic bid and he was only trying to act as a catalyst to encourage other bidders or he may have expected RT to cave in to an offer that more than doubled the SP.

Whatever the truth of the matter, there were too many hot-headed investors who had banked on a quick sale and were easy targets for shorters once the offers collapsed. I suspect the SP would be a lot healthier had BM never rekindled his interest in the company

tabasco - 27 Jun 2008 12:17 - 460 of 8631

I would love to understand the situation Scotty.everybody acts for a gain in some way.. its human nature. RT did not want a takeoverBM has a large financial interestevery single piece of news has apparently been designed to murder the SP other than the initial approach. The SP would have certainly been much healthier had there been no approach. End of the day RT position not a banker.BM done his Boll**ks..Peter Ibbetson goes crying to his mummy investors not exactly happy bunniesthe only gainers were the shorters And they just used the fiasco. I personally think BM was far more sure of his position and his actions than most people thought.I think unfortunately he did have the backing.. I cannot see him throwing away telephone numbers just as a vendetta.. would you drive a price down if you were sitting with a shed loadunless you were guaranteed to be the winner. I dont think BM is used to coming second. I hope Im wrong! either way mdx will grow!
Register now or login to post to this thread.