bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
AdieH
- 12 Jan 2005 08:36
- 461 of 27111
Glad I hold both seo and pdx, maybe my portfolio will turn blue at the end of the year...
andysmith
- 12 Jan 2005 08:41
- 462 of 27111
Dynamite, SEO are dynamite and we are all looking forward to this year.
My daughter is pleased that I invested her driving lessons savings in this!!
EWRobson
- 12 Jan 2005 08:54
- 463 of 27111
Broken decisively through the resistance level. Bought CFDs yesterday via Blue Index. They were back on this morning asking my views on how far it will go! Need John's confirmation on this, but the break is likely to be decisive: min. 8p (25%), more likely 8.5p (33%). But the results could take them skyward as the effect of their royalties policy is realised. Are you behind the explosion, Dynamite?
Eric
AdieH
- 12 Jan 2005 09:13
- 465 of 27111
Good Luck dynamite, got into pdx at 48p, sold out on nice profit, bought back in sub 2.00 and waiting for 4.00 approx.
SEO well I would like to see 10p then maybe take some profit...
Good Luck to all.
johngtudor
- 12 Jan 2005 10:08
- 466 of 27111
Eric,
Using some different charting s/w, I have found a previous peak in the SP at 7p. So if we can break through that price on a close for two days then the next initial stop according to my trend lines would be 8p. Clearly though the share has its own dynamic. As for Blue Index you should ask them what they think!! Hope that helps, and as I said earlier I am keeping my powder dry for the time being!
John
SEADOG
- 12 Jan 2005 11:14
- 467 of 27111
Eric and John,
I have been back to when the share was first listed and found that on 26/1/1999 the share shot up from 1/2p to 16p returning to 1/2p on 2/2/1999 -- Strange.
In Jan 2000 it again went up from 3p to 7p and traded between 7p and 4p until approx July 2000 when it was back down to trading between 2 and 4p until Oct 2003 when it went up to the present range between 4 and 6p. Hope that doesnt complicate things. SD
SEADOG
- 12 Jan 2005 11:42
- 468 of 27111
Eric and John,
The 16p rocket does not show up on two other charting programmes so it could be an error in the data, SD
EWRobson
- 12 Jan 2005 12:37
- 469 of 27111
John and SEADOG
I see the 7p peak but, of course, that was in the previous incarnation as a provided of optical fibres. Wouldn't the theory chaps discount that event? Incidentally, I am trawling through PDX at the moment which has a lot of parallels with SEO. The two main contrasts are: SEO are some six months ahead in coming to market; nevertheless, the cap. of PDX is nearing 100M. Now, would the explanation be that PDX have had analyst brokers to push the sp whereas SEO are content with media consultants? I suspect that SEO is undevalued - suggests sp should be more like 12.5p to give 100m cap. Well, that's my fundamentalist target anyway!
No reply yet to my queries on PDX thread which appears less active: what is price structure for new equipment? is there a parallel to royalties structure of SEO and, if so, what? has share been written up as PLAY in Shares? Anyone here who can help?
Eric
AdieH
- 12 Jan 2005 13:09
- 470 of 27111
Hi EWR, they are looking to licence the pumps to companies, they have agreed one licencing deal with Coca Cola (UK) also tie up with another food manufacturing company (no figures have been quoted).
They are have also set up a different division regarding "firemist" which could be the biggest revenue of them all, lots of trials etc going on.
If you want further information I would suggest you look at their website (pursuitdynamics). Hope this is of some help.
Regards AdieH.
EWRobson
- 12 Jan 2005 13:26
- 472 of 27111
Dynamite, AdieH
Thanks for the help with PDX. The July 17th 2003 article was good; recommendation at 43p as a potential 10-bagger; well its already a 5-bagger so only double from here! Mention is made of licensing but I can't find reference to royalties, which is what is so attractive about SEO. Charts are much less positive for PDX than SEO so I'll put them on the active watchlist. Mind, I love their technology solution; its just that the price is further ahead of itself than SEO.
There were three 1M trades in SEO between 08:10 and 08:15 (one trade, 2 reported an hour later). All are shown as sells but, of course, the T sell must have a T buyer! My reckoning is that the O trades are buys because the price was marked up immediately rather than down.
Eric
AdieH
- 12 Jan 2005 13:31
- 473 of 27111
Good points Diana.
johngtudor
- 12 Jan 2005 14:09
- 474 of 27111
Eric, As a contrast I like the look of the PDX chart, and will be looking to buy in. As for Fundamentals on SEO, you are correct in that previous SP high's were made under different incarnations of potential products...and of course the glory days of the last bull run. However you asked for a strict chart view and in that case you read as much as you can from what the charts tell you...on the other hand....!! Seriously if the SEO SP breaks through this trading range it is into new terriority. Perhaps today's push is because of the EVO link, but that may become a negative in days to come...ala YOO...who knows! Hence the need IMO to wait for a 2 day break.
Have a profitable day. John
EWRobson
- 12 Jan 2005 14:19
- 475 of 27111
John
Thanks for that. I believe Evolution were commenting as analysts rather than having a direct commission, although I suspect that the sp needs that role to be filled. You mention a two day break: I suspect this is to avoid a spike but I can't remember reading about that in Kahn. I'll hold off until tomorrow before investing the gain on the CFDs though. I think I have learnt the lesson about FRIWAFTT (Fools, etc!) Happy trading!
Eric
johngtudor
- 12 Jan 2005 14:30
- 476 of 27111
Eric,
The 2 day rule is one of my golden rules...others use it as well. Re Kahn, good but no one book or 'guru' has written the holy grail on this. What they write has worked for them etc...so I find it best to take what works for me, and build up a set of rules based on experience.
John
bosley
- 12 Jan 2005 14:41
- 477 of 27111
wow!! cant believe how busy this thread has become lately. we must be doing well. price hitting 7p ceiling again . hoping for breakout but i dont feel too confidant. there has been no news . are people buying in hope of asda making the trials a deal? or is there something in the wind ? do certain priviledged people know who the mystery company is?if it breaks out i will take some profit and wait for the inevitable dip when cc is finalised.
bosley
- 12 Jan 2005 14:47
- 478 of 27111
worthwhile looking at the link provided earlier . i thought seo had patented starch based packaging yet there is no mention of seo in the article. interesting..... as sainsburys and macdonalds were the companies mentioned in the original article i read on seo as being keen on seos technology.
EWRobson
- 12 Jan 2005 17:55
- 479 of 27111
bosley
Here we are, having to sell your own stock to you! lol! Well, I've done my own research and concluded that SEO is a 10-bagger, giving it a couple of years, anyway. Still only 50m cap compared to PDX at nearly 100K and not so far along the road. Broken through resistance level so should move to higher ground. My price objective is 12.5p, i.e. cap of 100K. Convincing factor to me though is a fundamental - machine costs 40K then 30K PER ANNUM royalties. Straight through to the bottom line. 100 machines is 3m to the bottom line. 1000 machines is 30M to the bottom line. How long will that take? Plan to use the CFD gain to fund more CFDs - can make a 10-bagger a 100-bagger that way! Do I sound balanced and objective - yes, its all head stuff, really (or should I have said, heady)!
Eric
driver
- 12 Jan 2005 18:10
- 480 of 27111
Bosley
I didnt pick up on that I assumed that the article meant SEO may be not
"We have lead suppliers with whom we work very closely on new technology "
Link again below
http://www.packworld.com/articles/Related_Articles/14472.html