irlee57
- 13 Aug 2007 09:03
any comments, thoughts, on this stock.
hlyeo98
- 02 Oct 2007 08:14
- 561 of 1029
falling sharply again...good shorting...113p now
cynic
- 02 Oct 2007 08:19
- 562 of 1029
alan .... many thanks for your explanation; my very limited intellect just about coped.
hyleo ..... i thought i was being brave to foolhardy topping up my short late yesterday at 139.3 .... clearly not ...... does one short further? ..... quite possibly ..... in fact, just sold another goujon at 121
hewittalan6
- 02 Oct 2007 08:33
- 563 of 1029
Heres a thought though, cynic.
If NRK are going through the mill, then in the absence of any other variables, any other lender with the same model must be too.
I am not very good with balance sheets and the like but I know of 3 lenders who jealously eyed the NRK success in lending out money and tried to copy the products, so what must they have to reveal?
The companies are;
Coventry, but their underwriting was more robust and they are mutual anyway.
Mortgage Express. I forget who their owners are but I will try to find out. However their rates were a little higher, but their borrowers less prime.
Birmingham Midshires (part of HBOS). Also very aggresive and very similar product and underwriting to NRK. In their favour, they have the clout of HBOS behind them, but it may still show up badly on the HBOS books. Secondly, they were less exposed to retail and more exposed to BTL lending. This may have insulated them a little, but I think that may come home to roost soon.
On balance, HBOS might be worth a close look with a view to shorting any hint of bad news.
Alan
cynic
- 02 Oct 2007 08:38
- 564 of 1029
alan .... interesting thought though next bank reporting season is a little way off
hewittalan6
- 02 Oct 2007 08:51
- 565 of 1029
What do we think about reports that other lenders are going to the ECB, rather than BoE for a loan, in order to keep it their little secret? Could it be that NRK are simply the most transparent (or naive)? Or is it simply the rumour mill going into overdrive?
cynic
- 02 Oct 2007 08:57
- 566 of 1029
not rumour ... it's in Telegraph this morning
Big Al
- 02 Oct 2007 08:57
- 567 of 1029
NRK only the tip of the iceberg IMO. ECB keep things quieter I believe
hewittalan6
- 02 Oct 2007 09:16
- 568 of 1029
So if it is not rumour, then the smart money will be looking for the similar models to short, because even if it is kept mum for now, it must be reported at some stage, even if only on the results.
On the high street, I will go against conventional wisdom and go for HBOS (only with play money - I don't generally short). Off the high street, I will have an each way bet on a rank outsider - GMAC-RFC, wholly owned by General Motors.
Ladies and Gents, place your bets for a very interesting banking season!!!
EDIT - And the announcement of a review of the FSA, followed by a break up of what it regulates into seperate authorities - back to the 80's!!
partridge
- 02 Oct 2007 09:32
- 569 of 1029
The BOS part of HBOS has been very aggressive in the corporate leveraged debt field, so if you add in possible problems at Birmimgham Midshires, you may be right Alan. I have a feeling that this issue has surfaced just in time to save the whole sector from meltdown and that the recent knocks to the bank shares might provide a good buying opportunity for the patient. If only we knew......
hewittalan6
- 02 Oct 2007 09:51
- 570 of 1029
In hindsight, we all have 20/20 vision, and looking back at my analogy of a mortgage book being comparable to a bond, we should have seen it coming long ago. After all, a sub prime or delinquent or low rate mortgage book is no more than a junk bond, and look what happened to them. And the repurcussions afterwards.
Scary if it played out fully.
Alan
Balmoral
- 02 Oct 2007 11:15
- 571 of 1029
rumour that shares are being called in - don't know why? - therefore I've closed short
cynic
- 02 Oct 2007 11:40
- 572 of 1029
wonder if that is a move prior to formal suspension ...... seems the most likely, though do not understand what is meant by "called in" as if someone has a short option or cfd it is not subject to arbitrary cancellation by the stock-lender
Strawbs
- 02 Oct 2007 11:48
- 573 of 1029
I assume (but could be wrong) that people (institutions) who have lent out shares (for the purposes of shorting) have called them in (i.e. want them back).
Only guessing though....
Perhaps someone better informed could comment.
Strawbs
fliper
- 02 Oct 2007 13:54
- 574 of 1029
These are high risk , money can be made but only if you get in at the right price . I am glad that i was on the golf course yesterday , otherwise i my had got in at 1.30 .
maddoctor
- 02 Oct 2007 14:14
- 575 of 1029
the rumour is a rescue at 175
skinny
- 02 Oct 2007 14:46
- 576 of 1029
Looking at the rule 8 RNS - Barclays have been busy.
explosive
- 02 Oct 2007 16:57
- 577 of 1029
Stop loss hit at around lunch time, thats me out the game.... Will watch with interest....
cynic
- 02 Oct 2007 17:17
- 578 of 1029
i have kept all my short positions open, but with a guaranteed stop - well worth the very small premium .... if this rumoured 175 bid is shown to have any substance, then sp will be rocket, but i shall be out with a very nice profit, albeit only 40/60% of what it was notionally at say 9 o'clock this morning ..... if the rumour is groundless, and there is certainly no follow-up statement, then sp will plunge once more
Big Al
- 02 Oct 2007 18:04
- 579 of 1029
I've mentione dthat 175p area was significant 10 days ago. It was awhile before she plummeted through. There's something significant there anyway. Bigger volume today than we've had since last Monday, which may be another indicator.
As for me, I'm completely flat NRK. Took a hit in the SIPP, but made a fair bit of it up trading both ways last week via spreadbets and CFDs.
Congrats to those who took the longer term short route as opposed to us in/out types. Nice profits, but I suspect the game's almost over now.
Who's next though, I wonder. ;-))
cynic
- 02 Oct 2007 18:42
- 580 of 1029
bigger volume today will prob just be an indication of peeps taking profits or protecting their position - much the same thing.
with regard to this rumoured bid, it is just that, but even if true in principal, it is certainly not yet a formal approach and the books have clearly to be opened up ...... were it otherwise, an rns would have been mandatory.
tomorrow promises another interesting day!