The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Actually, Chilli, not that I want or intend to short Meldex, but I think you'll find it's probably just as easy to short Plus Markets cr@p than anything else.

:o)

Hope so Hils :-)

Dil I did not say whether I was buying into the CLNI merely said I would not be paying 20p for a 1p share2,500 is small change and will be accommodated with ease by most..
Dil you are wrong about the companyyou are wrong about Barry/Garry.and you are heading for a surpriseI wont arguelet us wait and see what the state of play is at the end of Juneafter I have scrapped six weeks in La Napoule.very lucky!!!!

Hilary.I believe you are wrong from the info I have to hand.but I never argue with a lady

Tabatha - I want to see some folk take the pain, you included. It should've been obvious even to a dimwit like you.

;-)))))))))))

Big mouthed ugly cnut.... What a poor excuse for a man...I will not be sufering painbut I know a few that areyou are an evil fuc*er!!!
If there are a number of short sell positions locked in at the moment they will need stock to cover where is it going to come from?
Some would say the answer is to spin negativity and fear on these BBsdont hear that very often do we?
Then they are reliant of us loyal investors capitulating.HA HA!
If they have to wait till trading begins they will be getting a nasty shock.a big gamble to leave a short position open once trading begins.could be a dilemmaI wonder if any of the old bods are sitting with what they believed to be the perfect punt?

I am not wrong about Barry , he bled them dry once and now he's trying to save his own ar*e.

Lets get it right tabby , he don't give a flying fcuk about me or you or any other shareholder ... never has and never will , until now he's always managed to jump ship before it sank. This time he's going down with it and good enough for him as far as I'm concerned.

Is there anybody else that reads this thread and has the same view as that poor excuse?he genuinely wants to see folk take painwho else thinks like that? please post on here with your viewsI would really like to knowI personally dislike some companies and have my reasonsbut hand on heartI would never want to see people take painit affects marriages childrenand friendships.and in my previous business I have seen heartachetrust me! what kind of a person is prepared to put this view in writing on a BB?
Bouncyyou are a disgrace.and there is no excuse for what you said

Dilyou are wrongand I know you are wrong!no more arguments over the matter what do you think of bouncys remarksand please dont turn it into a joketrue feelings pleaseI take his comments as being quite disgusting and shameful... serious mode
Meeting the wife up the village for a pinttoddle pip

t
i cant help but wonder who those 2 mil of liabilities that will be repaid from the SCLN
are owed to. until we see the full audited accounts we wont know. i have my suspicions but i am often wrong. thats why i suggested in my previous post that the fully audited accounts ought to be available for all before having to decide on whether or not to invest in the SCLN. thats not unreasonable is it?
if they cannot be available then why not extend the closing date until they are? thats not unreasonable is it?
maybe they will be. i do hope so.
regards
jkd

Tabatha

You are one of the most obnoxious characters I've ever come across on a BB. You knew the answer to the question when you asked it and demanded a response. A claculating answer got a calculating response. Brilliant. Predictable response as ever. Christ, you're easy m8!!

ROFLMAO!!!!!

BTW, you are suffering. You can smell it.

Big Al - 08 Apr 2009 16:27 - 6925 of 6932
"Tabatha - I want to see some folk take the pain"
------------------
Bouncy.I see not one person including all the gang has backed up your point of viewand whatever my differences are I am grateful to them.some on here might not like me but they would never stoop as low as your disgusting commentQuite frankly you are rightI did know your reasons for hanging aroundI knew you wanted people to take painincluding myself and you have put in writing you are a cnut10 out of 10 for honesty but 0 out of 10 for decencya lot of my friends have taken pain and that has caused us painbut personally this year we have purchased another property which have tenantsand thanks to the ftse hitting 3500 and MKS as well as just recently buying a further nice chunk of RSA @ just over 1-20 I am up 60k in the first quartertry smelling thatto everone else I aint a clever arsein fact I am a self confessed thicko just a tad luckyand I play and work bloody hardjust finished 14 hours solid racing related workchicken feed to Barry's efforts!

Hey tabs - lets go back to post 6912 where you comment on the similarity between BJM and Lester Piggot .....

I don't think you're being entirely fair. Ok, they might both have been convicted as liars, frauds and cheats; but I don't think BJM served time did he?

G

lol

LOL!

Tabatha - you got what you wanted be it right or wrong. I just love getting you going. ;-))))))))

BTW, I've many reasons for hanging around here - one tends to stick with the stocks you know, regardless. The banter with MDX is an added pleasure.

;-0

PS - if you've been so successful this quarter and claim to have covered your MDX losses many times over now, why can't you just take the hit and move on? The only logical reason really is that you've been "economical with the truth", my friend. No surprise there then.

Haven't really be paying much attention to MDX since they delisted, but have caught up with the thread on here and in the Zoo today.

I'm not entirely sure that I can believe what I've been reading; am I right in understanding that BJM is proposing that new and existing investors can contribute to a fund raising at 10p per share? I always wondered why BJM spent so much time posting on a public financial BB and never thought for one moment it was for the benefit of anyone else (after all he's happily ripped off every company he's been involved in). Seems he had an idea he was going to need a numpty pool of investors to turn to at some point in the future and by accommodating their desperate needs (Stockholm Syndrome) he might actually pull it off. The company isn't worth more than a penny, even if it does manage to list on PLUS.

PTH
Not exactly right, read the presentation in post 6900

tabby - pt says Happy Easter and give his regards to bazza

Dil - stop shit stirring :)

Thanks for the link Jeffie. I think the parallel between the Blue Sky Summary comment and 2009 sales is entirely appropriate. Q1 sales of 35k isn't a good start for the year. Seems BJM and GC are not overly confident on basing the options on SP performance, which is mostly out of their control (although BJM does have a fine history of ramping in this respect). Were I invloved in this mess I would certainly be concerned at the EBIDTA element, MDX are not exactly innocent in accounts manipulation!!

I don't understand why BJM doesn't raise the 6M himself, he's seems to have loads of mates who like to invest in Blue Sky companys, why share the wealth?