kitosdad
- 12 Dec 2007 16:20
The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 08:24
- 7681 of 8631
Good morning all>
Dilwhat is this fixation with Eakin? I dont know the guyI was just acting as the go-betweenso you could sell your one share.
As you are someone that professes to know a little on accountingwould you not do better in taking part in the MDX offer?an option to acquire shares at a predetermined price at any time over the next three years and your option money is secured and carries a coupon.seems like the sort of punt any half brained hillman would go forpretty much a racing certaintycould bring down your average on the one share currently standing at 8pbingo!
ptholden
- 28 Jul 2009 08:30
- 7682 of 8631
Omg, what a loon.
Secured on what exactly? Lol
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 08:54
- 7683 of 8631
It seems most half brained muppets didn't go for it, so why would a smarter Dil? ;-))))))))
There are so many better options for a bigger return out there if only they'd look. Stupid
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 08:54
- 7684 of 8631
B J Muncaster - 27 Jul'09 - 23:40 - 12183 of 12214
Well it looks a though the same old questions keep popping up again and again. I keep on answering them and they just keep on coming. I wonder who has the most stamina?
Right here goes again (for the umpteenth time) for the benefit of cautiousmoney:
1.Why no arrests?
I guess its because no complaint has been submitted to the police. Seems a sensible answer to me. What do you think?
2. Why was the conversion of 10p above the close at 7p
Because the offer is not a placing its a three year, secured, coupon carrying option, derisked to allow cash repayment at the end of the term. An excellent deal, but rejected by 97% of the shareholders.
3.Why has BJM not implicated the KKs ?
Do you not read anything I post or anything the Company says? I repeat, we have said time and time again we will take action against all the culprits.
4. Why did we wait so long to raise money ?
Im bloody good at what I do and I work my nuts off all hours. In January we inherited a company with a WUP against it, no NOMAD, 21 loss making companies with huge liabilities, no cash, no sales, and lots of employees doing nothing on high compensation packages. By April, yes April, we presented to shareholders our plans to raise capital. By that time we had restructured the Company, rid the Company of enormous liabilities, cut the workforce to the right size and with the right people to do the job, defeated the WUP, relaunched the Menoflavon brands, formed a JV to manage a film for drinks project, prioritised development projects, got the basis of a new website working, entered discussions with two parties to create a JV for a film production plant, and carried out sufficient investigations to instruct lawyers to commence proceedings against former directors.
We then took another few weeks to get ready the offer document, which required a lot of work because of its novel aspects, in that, we were able to offer all shareholders an opportunity to support the Company without doing a rights issue (which would have failed) and without having to prepare a full prospectus at a high and unaffordable cost.
While we were doing all of this, a few naysayers on here were moaning about how we were planning to rip-off the assets.
5.Why have the claims not been put on the website ?
Given your self proclaimed pseudo-legal background you should know it would be the wrong thing to do. The documents are available from the court, why not get them for yourself, or have your legal team of lawyers and barristers get them for you.
c)What was the litmus test the KKs passed
Im surprised you still dont get this. You want the KKs to appear in court, do you not? At least thats what youve posted here. What do you think the chances of that happening if they hadnt been elected to the main BOD? Use your brain man.
Now, Mr. I wont be supporting the Company Eakin smells a rat:
I smell a rat in this whole affair.
1. Barry can you please send me an updated debtors list since the SLN circular?
There are no new debtors. All sales are made and paid for in short order. I think you meant creditors, but as you asked about debtors Ive answered your question.
2. How has the company been funded since January and how will this money be repaid?
VAT refund, R&D tax credits, receipts from sales, trade finance provided by Gary (repaid on receipt from the debtor and then reused again), personal funding of expenses etc. So, there is nothing to be repaid arising from the activities since January. That, Mr Smell A Rat, is a remarkable achievement in anyones book. Try it yourself sometime.
3. ATEK hold 15million shares (approximately?), how many units are you aware of being subscribed with association to ATEK? I am pretty positive you will have been in touch with the members?
About 10 as far as Im aware. And I havent been in touch with all members, so your positivity is misplaced.
4. You told Bloomberg that you expect to relist with a market cap of 27-32 million, Assuming the full 12 million take up (800 million shares), do you expect the SP to open in the 3.5-4p range?
My comment to Bloomberg was based on a 10p offer price. You do the math.
5. How can I be sure you aren't stalling a major deal and buying millions of pounds worth of SLN's at 2p to dramatically lower you average with the intent of announcing the deal after the SLN and then selling out?
You cant be sure. What do you want me to say that I havent said a gazillion times before?
Then cautiousmoney again, who takes bargainbobs email from RT as being gospel:
Rob Molloy looks like it was 2007, So do tell Rob what has been done ??
So lets get this straight. Cautiousmoney is prepared to accept RTs word about a meeting Im supposed to have had with the KKs in 2007. This is the word of someone who has had his assets frozen and proceedings brought against him, as posted by Chay, for orchestrating sham transactions to inflate sales figures. And just to add salt to the wounds the document is distributed bargainbob! It would be hysterical if it wasnt so sad.
For the record, I first met the KKs at a meeting held at RSDs office in October of 2008. Geoff Nash of FinnCap was present along with RSD and Peter Sugarman. Im sure any or all of them would confirm what Ive said to be true. So, CM and BB, stick that where the sun dont shine.
That would be to get 6 million at a fair rat of interest lets say errrmmm 18 % that would be fair to all shareholders
OK CM, why not ask shareholders if theyd be prepared to lend 6M to the Company, unsecured and with no chance of conversion to equity for 18% interest. Ill be interested in the response.
Ooooh hang on a minute can anyone remember what happened to the Hollister case
Now dont be so disingenuous CM. You know what happened in the Hollister case, dont you. Everyone else does, so I cant believe youre Billy No Mates on that issue.
B J Muncaster - 27 Jul'09 - 23:45 - 12184 of 12214
Dil,
Eakin (who will not be supporting the Company) visits Cambridge regularly and asked if he could visit the office. He was told he'd be welcome any time. He hasn't taken up the offer. So, it wouldn't be too difficult for him to look inside the blackbox, would it. He chooses not to do so. Yet moans on here about it. A lightweight in my book. A lot of other shareholders have taken up a simliar offer and have been made most welcome, and I repeat it's open to all.
-----------------------------------
longj0hn - 28 Jul'09 - 00:50 - 12205 of 12217
Dill
"He still don't get it !!!
It's not a 7p company feckwit its worth near enough feck all and you won't get even 2p on relisting. "
Dill OK I will give you 1.5P for every share that you have and you can tell your mates on that shite thread that the offer is open to them also, put your E-mail addey up and we will get it on, same deal also for your loudmouthed mates
-----------------------
Great summary of the gang John
BTW Dil Robin B stardthe girl band.how aboutdesperado as your nom de plumeyou and the gang will go to any lengths to post negativelywho do you think you fool?
Barry/GarryThank you for your effortsit is appreciated by all the decent holders.
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 08:55
- 7685 of 8631
"bring down your average "
You've learnt nothing, Tabatha.
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 09:00
- 7686 of 8631
Dear Barry,
Why on earth would any sensible fellow stick yet more good money into an outfit with minimal sales, let alone profits, has huge debts, can't finance its day to day running costs, etc, etc?
The only people likely to prop this up is those who can't afford for it to fail - simple! Apparently they can only finance this SLN by loaning from banks, credit cards or other sources that should not be used for investing, and they are a small minority.
Regards,
Al
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 09:03
- 7687 of 8631
The following bit says it all, Tabatha:
"We then took another few weeks to get ready the offer document, which required a lot of work because of its novel aspects, in that, we were able to offer all shareholders an opportunity to support the Company without doing a rights issue (which would have failed) and without having to prepare a full prospectus at a high and unaffordable cost."
They're using a "novel" approach becasue a rights issue would have failed. Get that through your thick skull, bookie. From the horses mouth. LOL!
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 09:41
- 7688 of 8631
C.it aint worth it matehis last post proves beyond doubt and with absolute certainty.the man is as thick as an LBC he cant typeand I am beginning to wonder if he can readjust here to earn a few tenners..
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 09:58
- 7689 of 8631
"Earn", not "lose" being the important bit. Says it all (again). Be more positive, sonny.
ROFLMAO!
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 10:03
- 7690 of 8631
A few tenners being the important bit...
ptholden
- 28 Jul 2009 10:04
- 7691 of 8631
Seems tabbytwat has invented an imaginary friend, must be regressing into his childhood - lol. Mind you, must be difficult being in a majority of one :)
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 10:23
- 7692 of 8631
I see The Gay Boy Potty has turned up to play with the gangI suspect he has written something nice about Tabasco or MDX or Barry.anyone know if he is wearing his red silk cravat
Big Al
- 28 Jul 2009 10:26
- 7693 of 8631
tabasco - 28 Jul 2009 10:03 - 7690 of 7692
A few tenners being the important bit...
Yeah right, that'll be the day. LOL!!
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 10:34
- 7694 of 8631
I'm Potty & nutty, I rise at ten thirty
And saunter along like a toff
I walk down the Strand with my gloves on my hand
Then I walk down again with them off
I'm all airs and graces, correct easy paces
Without food so long I've forgot where my face is
I'm Pot, Pot, I haven't a lot
But my people are well off you know.
Nearly everyone knows me from Smith to Lord Rosebr'y,
I'm Potty the nutty from Bow.
ptholden
- 28 Jul 2009 10:39
- 7695 of 8631
Lol you really have lost the pot (sic) haven't you?
ptholden
- 28 Jul 2009 10:41
- 7696 of 8631
Ps. Why pretend you can't read my posts? I sussed you out a long time ago :)
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 10:49
- 7697 of 8631
I have got The Gay Boy Potty going that is another two posts
Mr. Pottywhen you are wearing your Red Silk Cravatdo you say "buggah orf!" or 'bugger off!.Im sure Dil will give me your answer
Dil
- 28 Jul 2009 10:50
- 7698 of 8631
Thank longjohn for his very generous offer tabby but tell him I'm in for the long term :-)
tabasco
- 28 Jul 2009 10:59
- 7699 of 8631
DilI had you as shrewd
I applaud the "democratisation" of RP which is no longer the language of a "tight little Establishment group" I am wary of overtly political arguments but note that some have suggested that "posh" RP with its non-phonetic behaviour difficult "pure" vowels distinctive "U" vocabulary and traps for the unwary was ideally suited for the task of separating Us from Them. Red Silk Cravatsspinning Bow tiesfrom plain humble PIs
ptholden
- 28 Jul 2009 11:02
- 7700 of 8631
Tabbytwat, you could never get me going in a million years.
How many units have you subscribed to? Barry's a winner, surely you're supporting your hero?
Why have you stopped posting in the zoo as J Bravo Esq? They miss you, the ramping team is shrinking by the day and they need all the support they can get. Seems you're outside the 'circle of trust'.
Dil. You'll have to pass the questions on, the resident clown still claims he doesn't read my posts LoL