jojojo
- 15 Mar 2006 16:10
Has anyone got any ideas why VLR continues to fall? They are one of the few Fuel cell company to have actually successfully comercialised their product and the potential for future growth is huge.
cynic
- 02 May 2006 16:14
- 61 of 249
??????????? 75 shares ????????? ....... never thought the market was so tight that that was the most on offer
G D Potts
- 02 May 2006 18:52
- 63 of 249
Lizard i think you may have made a wild calculation.
lizard
- 02 May 2006 19:14
- 64 of 249
st/gdp- i had 9925 and wanted to round off to 10k- have a new broker that has offered two months no commission trading. otherwise would not have bothered.
free trading is most enjoyable you can high tick a stock without any charge.
lizard
- 03 May 2006 10:15
- 66 of 249
still awaiting it dynamite- will post!.
lizard
- 03 May 2006 10:48
- 68 of 249
this is an overview of the company from fuel cellswebsite; not awaiting article.
Voller Energy; focused on the power requirements for the next generation of portable electronic devices. This includes products such as mobile generators and battery chargers, as well as integrated products that will eventually replace secondary batteries used in devices such as mobile phones, portable radios, personal digital assistants (PDA's), powertools, medical equipment, remote monitoring equipment, mobile test systems, laptops etc.
lizard
- 03 May 2006 18:53
- 69 of 249
lizard
- 03 May 2006 19:38
- 70 of 249
;
hlyeo98
- 03 May 2006 23:08
- 71 of 249
Good article on Voller, thank you lizard. Time to pile in at 68p.
lizard
- 04 May 2006 07:21
- 72 of 249
seems to be one to hold imo for the med long term.
G D Potts
- 05 May 2006 12:38
- 73 of 249
Very brief article in Shares magazine as a tip for the 'Aggressive Investor', just a brief outline of what Voller does but it should all contribute to getting Voller in the spot light over ITM and CWR.
lizard
- 05 May 2006 13:19
- 74 of 249
all positive stuff gdp one for the medium long term.
got my eye on goo news expected.
Confidant
- 05 May 2006 13:25
- 75 of 249
VLR vs ITM
Not really the same despite the obvious attempt by VLR to allude to ITM in recent statement -- a bit of bad form
ITM key is that it will use green energy --- VLR I think distils Hydrogen from LPG
Cost for VLR will always be higher than LPG obviuosly
ITM can use "lost" energy, if it can succesfully get an electrolyser cheap enough to store it. Lost energy is nuclear and wind/solar energy which cannot be stored at the moment so is wasted during periods of low demand - night time. ITM converts water into hydrogen and therefore gets rid of need for fossil fuel, fuel dependance etc.
That's why it has a mkt cap of 300m and VLR has one of 15m Not saying VLR is not cheap or indeed ITM not expensive but just thought I point out why there is a massive difference between the companies
mengelbretson
- 05 May 2006 16:14
- 76 of 249
Is it me or has the SP run out of a bit of steam this week ??
Hopefully it will be back to peak performance next week and continue its surge post 80p !!
049balt
- 05 May 2006 21:53
- 78 of 249
The fuel cell sector today is like the oil sector two years ago,anyone who had the foresight to buy oil stocks then has made money.
G D Potts
- 09 May 2006 10:14
- 80 of 249
I added in at the low a few weeks back of 38.50, but I am still looking add more on any future weaknesses. I will continue to buy Voller through 80p, I think for anyone who did miss Cwr + Itm Voller is the perfect play.