kitosdad
- 12 Dec 2007 16:20
The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.
Dil
- 06 Jul 2010 13:09
- 8421 of 8631
It's reality tabby , even the "loyal" supporters on the other bb are p*ssed off with Barry's cock up.
tabasco
- 06 Jul 2010 13:11
- 8422 of 8631
All right Sid?
tabasco
- 06 Jul 2010 13:28
- 8423 of 8631
Dilwhat are the odds of me giving you a 20/1 winner on the horses?
Gausie
- 06 Jul 2010 14:13
- 8424 of 8631
About 1 in 40 would be my guess.
Big Al
- 06 Jul 2010 14:37
- 8425 of 8631
re 8416
Tabatha - you're gonna need all the time in the world. ROFLMAO!
tabasco
- 06 Jul 2010 15:03
- 8426 of 8631
GausieJuly 5thpost race.. Bath 5:00 - WaterAid Handicap1st Panpiper 20/1 and I can guarantee to give you a lot more
Valuable lesson to be learnt there my big boylistenunderstandand then listen again carefully to those that knowBarry will not come secondhe will winand that is pre-race!
tabasco
- 06 Jul 2010 15:15
- 8427 of 8631
Gausieyou had a bit of luck that I never excepted your very generous odds of 40/1...had you refused to pay out and it went to court
I think you would have lostare you insured?watch out for Bazza...
Dil
- 06 Jul 2010 15:54
- 8428 of 8631
It's you that should have listened tabby.
Gausie
- 06 Jul 2010 15:54
- 8429 of 8631
Gee thanks tabby. Already had you down as a "Tardis Trader". I guess you're a "Tardis Punter" too.
I'm afraid I don't see any valuable lesson there. Take me to court if you really want to. You'd be as vexatious a litigant as you are a poster.
And if this is the level of success you're expecting from Barry Muppetcaster - I'd agree. He'll also be a total failure.
Dil
- 06 Jul 2010 16:00
- 8430 of 8631
tabasco - 30 Apr 2008 12:22 - 200 of 8429
Can somebody tell me why mdx have dropped so dramatically on the news that Aquisitek were out of the running. Good news for the company I would have thought, and good news for me. The stock is so cheap my whole portfolio is on. I cannot believe anybody would consider a sell. Still thanks to them all. It will give me another big payday in a company that is rock solid. As an ex. Bookmaker I would lay longgggggg odds on, for a rapid 25% correction. I have been in and out of the stock since it was 27p and it has been lucky for me, but this looks like the best chance to date. The delayed prelim. results are hinted to be good. Some of you lads that are far more knowledgeable than me might have a better handle on the situation. This stock is crazy!!!
Yep the knowledgeable ones sure did tabby !
tabasco
- 06 Jul 2010 16:03
- 8431 of 8631
Straight over your headand it could have quite as easily gone straight throughlol
I think Dils silence tells me he understandsmaybe not?
tabasco
- 06 Jul 2010 16:12
- 8432 of 8631
That has been posted many times Dilat least four by bouncyit was posted for a responsedoes it look like my post it achieved the necessary responsesI dont need to edit post because they serve their purposeas it happened I did not write that postbut I quite easily could have
Now wait and see who is going to end up right wit MDX.just sit back and the winner will be revealed
And if you want to dig old posts up DilI would suggest some fast editing.
tabasco
- 06 Jul 2010 16:27
- 8433 of 8631
If you want to trace a crackergo back to BLM when Tabasco was a different sauce you have always made me laugh Dilyou have posted some extraordinary postsand we have always been on different sides of the fenceeven MDX Nasdaq.. lol
Dil
- 06 Jul 2010 16:56
- 8434 of 8631
Understand what tabby ... Sid ? - Haven't got a clue far too subtle for me.
Baltimore (Zergo) was a great trade up and down same as these but ultimately a pile of sh*te. Made some . lost some , made some ... so again don't know what your onabout.
MDX Nasdaq listing was a publicity stunt ... ramp , ramp.
tabasco
- 06 Jul 2010 17:21
- 8435 of 8631
lol..
ptholden
- 06 Jul 2010 18:08
- 8436 of 8631
'As an ex. Bookmaker I would lay longgggggg odds'
I think the odds are pretty good that you were the author of that post Tabasco!
tabasco
- 06 Jul 2010 19:19
- 8437 of 8631
PeterI dont tell liesA very good friend wrote that piece of bulls**tbut I am quite happy to take credit for it.I spend up to 12 hours a day with my racing interestsI would love to say I am good enough to do the lot on my ownreality is Im not!
Why not wait till this one plays itself out? we will then see who is right
As you can see you are off filtertry being nice like your old mate CynicIm sure you have it in youfrom what you have achieved
Off to watch Holland stuff Uruguayrewind.it will be tight
Big Al
- 06 Jul 2010 20:25
- 8438 of 8631
Look Tabatha, you're plainly no good at anything financial. Luckily for us you're arrogant and stupid enough to keep coming back for more.
I love you!!
Al
xx
ptholden
- 06 Jul 2010 22:59
- 8439 of 8631
Tabasco, I am always nice, to the point, but nice. I'm not really bothered if I'm on your filter list or not, but you'll never dissuade me you didn't write that pice of bullshit.
What I can't understand is your unshakeable belief that MDX will somehow recover and that BJM is some kind of hero. He creamed BPRG for every cent he could muster in the early days; the SEC accounts make for very interesting reading, quite how he got away with it I have no idea, but he certainly incorporated many practises from his first company (which resulted in his ban as a director for 7 years).
I must admit, I have always thought he wanted back in to make sure he had first dibs on the IP when it finally sinks, but perhaps there is also an ulterior motive? There seems an awful lot of skeletons ratling around in the MDX wardobe, going back many years. Make up your own mind, I doubt the whole truth will ever out.
tabasco
- 07 Jul 2010 08:14
- 8440 of 8631
Peterpeople tend to believe exactly what they wish forreality invariably produces a different end game
A quick question for you.Dil was once again posting on ADVFN until late into the night last nightwhy do you think he gives so much of his valuable time every day to a company that he wants to see a total wipe-out?
Barrys storm trooper act saved a company that was hours away from a winding up order by TFLBTDil has posted against Barry almost every day from that point...and not against TFLBTI know the answerdo you?if so would you like to share it with us? >
B J Muncaster - 6 Jul'10 - 19:14 - 9135 of 9198
The number of legal experts on this thread never ceases to amaze me. Yet, not one, repeat not one of the experts has contacted the Company to offer evidence to support their claims or to help the Company with its own claims.
As I understand it, a lot of shareholders have contacted the authorities and/or their MP without any success.
Most shareholders will be aware that in September 2008 RT sent a very detailed and long letter of complaint to the SFO and subsequently to the CoLP. Result?, nothing.
Shareholders who've read our accounts and announcements will know that we have provided files of evidence to the authorities. They will neither confirm nor deny if they are taking action.
With regard to the police, we have neither confirmed nor denied that we've contacted them. There is a reason for this and it was the subject of much heated debate when I met with Mots.
I have offered shareholders the opportunity to visit the office, sign a CDA, and look at our files. M5 has indicated he will do so, but has yet to confirm. No other shareholder has taken up the offer.
What would you have me do? Post confidential information here? If that's what you want then you'll have a long wait.