Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


markusantonius - 01 Sep 2005 12:26 - 8801 of 27111

Jeez, down again - wish I'd got out of these at 30p! Maybe II has been right all along? :o(

superrod - 01 Sep 2005 12:38 - 8802 of 27111

hes not right. its called trading.

markusantonius - 01 Sep 2005 12:51 - 8803 of 27111

Maybe so. But they're in 1:10 freefall at the moment.....

superrod - 01 Sep 2005 12:56 - 8804 of 27111

peeps buy.....peeps sell.....i buy with the crowd and sell with the crowd ( and hope for the best, unless you are a true INVESTOR ). no investment advice intended.

markusantonius - 01 Sep 2005 12:58 - 8805 of 27111

Q. Peeps, Rod?

ptholden - 01 Sep 2005 12:59 - 8806 of 27111

people / punters Markus, do keep up. You should have sold at 30p!!

markusantonius - 01 Sep 2005 13:00 - 8807 of 27111

Yes, I know..... :o(

superrod - 01 Sep 2005 13:01 - 8808 of 27111

never seen harry enfield? PEEPS = PEOPLE.

gem - 01 Sep 2005 13:21 - 8809 of 27111

this share is going nowhere fast, if its going anywhere its downhill, might be one to tuck away for 4-5 years but not at this price level

paulmasterson1 - 01 Sep 2005 13:35 - 8810 of 27111



Hi All,

3-5 years = 's a share, I have said this many times

Wait for later this afternoon, then the bargain hunters will show up .... as WT trades after the close .... LOL !!!!

Cheers,
PM

pisces - 01 Sep 2005 13:37 - 8811 of 27111

Gem,how can you say a shares going nowhere fast when its quadrupled in less than a year.Justify your comments please.

superrod - 01 Sep 2005 13:45 - 8812 of 27111

pisces
history is no guide.
and isnt going nowhere fast. its going down, slowly but surely. ( not a post wrt potential.....just what i see ).

gem - 01 Sep 2005 13:52 - 8813 of 27111

pisces,it may have quadrupled previously but since it hit 28p its steadilly receded back to current levels, with further to fall ? the advancement in price has been purely on speculation not bottom line profits, i`m looking at the last years graph and it doesn`t look good for the short to mid term from where i`m sitting , dyor

paulmasterson1 - 01 Sep 2005 14:28 - 8814 of 27111


Gem Hi,

In that case go somewhere else where you think you can make money, instead of irrelevant bashing here, because everyone that has done their own research here, knows they will make a fortune in SEO, it is only you that will lose out.

Cheers,
PM

EWRobson - 01 Sep 2005 14:30 - 8815 of 27111

What's this? pm and ii agreeing! angel and devil! Nevertheless it is interesting that DAWALLWORK is right re the potential of Stanelco and Gem and pisces et al are right to be cautious about short-term trading. At the moment, as pointed out in the Shares piece, SEO is a trader's stock. Thus the current sp is primarily governed by the game between traders and not the long-term position. A problem is that, without profits and thus pe's etc., it is difficult to put a figure on where the sp should be. Starpol is a strong addition to the protfolio and the Natureworks deal is good (as supplier to Stanelco) but the numbers being talked about can probably justify no more than 25-50m of the cap of some 180M. Thus the sp is primarily dependent on Greenseal. We are in the early stages of roll-out with Greenseal and, whilst informed investors may be confident, the market will wait to see the ASDA deal come to real numbers and a good deal being negotiated in the US. Thus II's graph shows the current trading channel and, for all his negativity, this speaks for itself.

So, what is fascinating with current position is that there is a real dicotomy (that's not an operation, sd!) between traders and investors. Investors will look at the longer-term trend line, upward from February, will weed out the hype induced by the traders, see the support level at 18p, project the position forward, say 6 months, when the ASDA deal is in full flow and good business coming through from the US and will be filling their boots with shares at around the current price. I suspect the traders will join them around 18p, perhaps wishing to be quite certain that the support level is not to be broken.

A point to add about the Traders' comments recently. Since MoneyAM got rid of the animosity shown and caused by some active Trader's this thread has returned to a high quality and I appreciate recent comments from the Traders as I suspect they are representative and they help to explain the movements in the market. I would add, though, that the real movement in the sp will come from the fundamentals and that could be dramatic and rapid, particularly if it were to be a significant Wal-mart announcement.

Good luck to all; T's and I's. What was that about dots and crosses?

Eric

gem - 01 Sep 2005 14:34 - 8816 of 27111

pm,this is an open board, don`t throw your toys out of the pram because you don`t like people airing a different view and good luck with your fortune telling, sorry i should have said fortune making

EWRobson - 01 Sep 2005 14:35 - 8817 of 27111

I notice that Evolution have repeated their Buy recommendation on 30th August and have kept their projections unchanged. Interesting in that they have withdrawn their previous papers from their evbgresearch site.

As per my previous note, I have no objection to the posts of gem and others questioning the short-term potential of SEO. I suggest, though, that gem reconsiders his 4-5 year view as, if there is to be a breakthrough in the market for Stanelco, it will have to happen within the year.

Eric

gem - 01 Sep 2005 14:53 - 8818 of 27111

eric, is what your saying basically that if there is no breakthrough back above the 28p( previosly reached) within a year then it is not going to happen ?

paulmasterson1 - 01 Sep 2005 15:10 - 8819 of 27111



Eric Hi,

EVO have put all the documents back on the website today ....

Cheers,
PM

Published Documents

05/07/05 - Joint venture deal
View PDF [227k]




06/06/05 - Update
View PDF [115k]




23/05/05 - Update
View PDF [138k]




11/04/05 -
View PDF [125k]




07/04/05 - Updates
View PDF [131k]




24/03/05 - Update
View PDF [185k]




28/02/05 - Update
View PDF [192k]




28/02/05 - Update
View PDF [148k]




08/02/05 - Results of RF trials
View PDF [168k]




31/01/05 - Update
View PDF [141k]




11/01/05 - Initiating coverage
View PDF [207k]

stockdog - 01 Sep 2005 15:10 - 8820 of 27111

eric - at least I can spell! there's a 'k' in the operation, but an 'h' in what you mean! lol!

gem - I am happy to present a very different view of the chart for you. We had a nice strong up channel from Jan to May, followed by a BULLISH downward sloping flag Jun-Jul which is a continuation formation which has now hit double bottom (lol Benny Hill!), breaking the downward retracement channel during August, before it resumes its strong upward channel towards 32p as forecast by Evolution. Even the last two day's drop has not broken the 18p d/b support level.

(Flag: A flag is a small rectangle pattern that slopes against the previous trend. If the previous move was up, then the flag would slope down. If the move was down, then the flag would slope up. Because flags are usually too short in duration to actually have reaction highs and lows, the price action just needs to be contained within two parallel trend lines. See Stockcharts.com)

http://stockcharts.com/education/ChartAnalysis/flagPennant.html

I see today a lot of traders and probably shorter-term investors selling to move on elsewhere to faster profits after only solid as opposed to exciting EGM news and from midday on a number of serious buyers coming in to pick up the baton at a good price.

I'm not claiming to be right, but I am saying my interpretation fits the facts as well as any.

sd
Register now or login to post to this thread.