Crocodile
- 16 Dec 2002 03:59
Kayak
- 16 Sep 2003 13:37
- 881 of 11003
The shop appears to have set up a local network without setting the security in the machines on the network, or at least not in PETERHARRIS's. What Windows do you use, and I can talk you through checking your own security.
Robb
- 16 Sep 2003 13:40
- 882 of 11003
Kayak
I am very grateful for the time you have spent helping me with this problem. You do this so often for so many people and it is not the first time you have helped me sort something out. It is much appreciated.
Regards
Rob
Robber - thanks for your suggestions. Looks like I need to make a phone call to my supplier!!
Robb
- 16 Sep 2003 13:42
- 883 of 11003
Kayak - I'm on XP Home. Would it be okay to email me your phone number so I can give you a quick ring? Or we can continue here if you would prefer.
Kayak
- 16 Sep 2003 13:44
- 884 of 11003
OK, have done.
Robb
- 16 Sep 2003 14:17
- 885 of 11003
Kayak
Just spoken to the shop. The "relay stations" that I mentioned include the boss who recently moved out of town and had this wireless broadband fitted. Looks like all the stuff I can see is his and his son's computers. Oooops! I bet it gets sorted double quick :-)
Regards
Rob
Kayak
- 16 Sep 2003 14:35
- 886 of 11003
lol, I bet it will :-)
The Other Kevin
- 17 Sep 2003 09:22
- 887 of 11003
I keep getting an error message which says that IE will have to close because of a fault in mshtmled.dll. I'm on Win 98 with IE 6. Any suggestions, please?
Spaceman
- 17 Sep 2003 12:21
- 888 of 11003
TOK, could be this :- http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=816506
Kayak
- 17 Sep 2003 12:35
- 889 of 11003
The Other Kevin
- 17 Sep 2003 15:09
- 890 of 11003
Kayak - Thanks for the link. I had, in fact, already had a look at the Google references and couln't see anything quite relevant.
Spaceman - More thanks. Your link took me to an mshtml (rather than mshtmled) link but patch Q816506 seemed relevant. But after the Download up came a message saying that I needed IE SP1 installed first. However, the Service Pack is already installed together with another relevant file, Q813489. I'll wait and see what happens.
Thanks again to both of you. (Said in a whisper so no one else will hear: the problem does appear mostly when logged on over the road. And one of K's Google refs mentioned "Java rich web pages" Now, I'm a tech numbskull but those words did seem to strike a chord. Mmmmmm)
Spaceman
- 17 Sep 2003 15:25
- 891 of 11003
TOK, sorry about that, not sure how I got that wrong, can you post the exact deatils of the message you are getting and I will try and investigate a bit more.
Have you updated your OS recently using Windows Update?
The Other Kevin
- 17 Sep 2003 15:52
- 892 of 11003
Spaceman - Everything up to date. The message, now from memory, seemed the same as referred to in your link, except that the problem was with mshtmled.dll rather than mshtml.dll. I'll post again when (and if) it pops up again. Regards, TOK.
The Other Kevin
- 18 Sep 2003 08:55
- 893 of 11003
Oh dear, there it goes again. "MS has encountered a problem with IE and needs to close" As before, the problem is with mshtmled.dll. At the time I was logged on here, over the road and was running a Synergy portfolio.
Pedro
- 18 Sep 2003 09:07
- 895 of 11003
Hi
Toshiba Tecra Laptop.
I don't know if this a problem, but there is definitely something wrong with my PC. I launch say Word (or any other app) and it will not start until I have managed to bring up the Task Manager, but I have noticed that my Secondary IDE Channel appears in the "safely remove hardware" box.
Or is it my RUND32.DLL file that is causing the delay.
Also running in processes I have a "backweb-7288971.exe" which I can not remember seeing before.
Any help appreciated as the delay in launching apps is most annoying !!
Peds
Pedro
- 18 Sep 2003 10:13
- 896 of 11003
backweb is for Easy Share software so not a problem there
Pedro
- 18 Sep 2003 10:38
- 897 of 11003
Checked Rundll32.exe and appears to be correct size etc. So is it all down to the Secondary IDE Channel ?
The Other Kevin
- 18 Sep 2003 12:09
- 898 of 11003
TullettJ - Thanks for the guidance. Checked out the file's properties and they seem ok. Mmmmmm?
Kayak
- 18 Sep 2003 12:34
- 900 of 11003
Optimist, strange, but you can always change the rule to put the messages into a separate folder and then delete the messages once in a while. That is better anyway in case your rules catch a bona fide message.