for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

shamona
i know EXACTLY what you mean but trust me......hes just the miserable old git in the corner ( much like me in the real world ). i say again, hes an OK guy, just needs getting used to.

and just in case you think im his No 1 fan, check out the TAD thread on advfn.

Shamona
you appear to have an unhealthy desire to see people as `yoofs`- get it seen too.You also display the sad, sad trademark of the pathetic oafs who , without any holding in a share appear on threads and pick on someone who has.
I pity you , really I do, now be sensible, gather up that brain-cell and SHORT SEO

ps I am long BPRG,
what a prat.

lols!

I don't care which shares you hold, show some respect to your fellow investors.

eoc

somebodys confidant 2million buy bprg

respect to fellow investors- and this clown isn`t an investor,what`s he doing here criticising shorters? what a creep-begone ,
back to the desert sands

Users you currently have squelched
shamona
Squelch a user

Aye BPRG are in for some dosh from SEO alright, some people can`t quit when they are ahead- but those two 2m deals look suspiciously like a slightly delayed reported roll-over, still even so they are sticking with it

The 2 million buy was a rollover. It was reported twicw in a few minutes at slightly differing prices.
Could equally be a rolled over short.
Once again it tells us nothing.
Alan

alan

No buys near this size recently, not a rollover!

The price movement now backs this up, these were buys.

I beg to differ Sham,
The deals were 0951, 2 million at 53p (buy)
and
0957, 2 million @ 52.89p (buy)
Either its a rollover or the 1st 2 million were bought for more than the second 2 million.
That doesn't make a lot of sense.
Either a rollover or 4 million bought. Take your pick.
Alan

whatever it was it will do me-BPRG up 10%, looks like the court case is coming to a head.

As BPRG sp has suddendly jumped 4.75p so far today and Stanelco are still down, does this mean BPRG have won the case?

Could do.
There again, both shares are exactly where they were a month ago, and it could just be that BPRG were oversold and SEO were over bought.
It could mean that Bprg have leaked a cc RNS that is great for them, or one that is good for both, just SEO connections have not heard the rumour yet.
It could mean anything you want it to!!!
As I said earlier, stop losses in place and a close eye on developements.
Alan

Thanks, Alan. Perhaps someone at the court could see how it's going and decided to nip out and put an order in for a few million.

As you say, it could mean anything. Don't usually post as I don't like the bickering (your posts are sensible) but think SEO will be fine even if they lose the case. Just may take a bit longer than we had hoped.

Personally, I dont think the case will have a huge impact on either company, regardless of how it goes, but that is just my opinion.
Potential costs etc. will have been accounted for ages ago.
Alan

alan, i dont that'll matter. it's all ifs, buts , depends and uncertainty at the moment. market sentiment can be vicious and over reacts to any bad news. i sold 50% the morning of the perseco deal at 18p and sold the remainder this morning. potential downside is a little too high for me , so i'm out for the moment. there might be a good time to get back in later . also, i might have got it completely wrong . i hope not.

Good luck, Bos. I hope you're wrong (don't take it personally), but I am sticking in there unless my stop loss kicks in.
That will get me out without any real damage, so my downside is virtually nil, but the upside hasn't really changed.
Do keep bobbing in on the thread though. We need balanced posters on here!!
alan

The court case result will now have massive impact, the judge virtually told SEO to settle, they have peed in the wind for years over this, investors are not daft these days, lack of clear thinking damns management in the eyes of thinking stock exchange followers.Think of the time effort and money poured into this nonsense.
Someone will pay , erm i.e. the shareholders.

No court case scheduled for tomorrow then, looks like its all over for now.

copy from schull69 - 19 Jan'06 - 17:09 on another bb


All:cc.a short post as I have to go out soon so just fact:the Court ended at 3.20 with the judges urging that the talks between the two sides,which were going on all day today we were told,should continue so that they can come to an agreement which is beneficial to both.Jacob said that the three judges will hold off starting coming to judgement until Monday ,but this process will start if they haven't heard up until that time that the two sides have come to an agreement.It was clear that if an agreement isn't arrived at there could be "years of litigation".He made his point strongly and Miller said he would continue to urge this on his clients.I can't recall Baldwin echoing this in as strong terms but he didn't disagree.The judges'recommendation for on-going talks should not be construed as pointing in any way to what their final judgement would be....I've got no idea on that.

I've got no inside track on how things could go so I wont waste your time with my speculations.

copy from another bb
phalarope - 19 Jan'06 - 18:22


Having attended all 4 days of the appeal (which finished this afternoon), I can tell you that the parties are trying very hard to settle out of court. At the end of the trial, the Lord Justices were told that they would hear by Monday if a settlement had been reached, and that if no settlement had been reached by then, then one was unlikely thereafter.
LJ Jacob made it clear that irrespective of the appeal result, many years of difficult litigation and sorting out of the patents lay ahead. Much better to concentrate on commercialisation to the benefit of both parties now, than wait another two years by which time a competitor could have emerged with a rival technology.

I won't comment too much on the appeal itself. Suffice to say that I think entitlement is likely to remain with BPRG with claims 6 and 7 of Patent 1 possibly going to them as well. Patents 2 and 3 could end up in joint ownership instead of solely with SEO as at present. Neither do I think that SEO will succeed in getting the prior art admitted to the case.

However, I beleive there is some chance that the breach of confidence finding in the original trial could be overturned. SEO were strongest on this, and don't forget, the original trial Judge wavered on this himself, before deciding in favour of BPRG.

If there is no settlement, I would have thought a jugdement will follow fairly quickly, say within a month.

Those are my thoughts. I'm no lawyer, so feel free to completely ignore them! But keep an eye open for a settlement RNS next week. I'm pretty confident we'll see one!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------