Fine.

Now

(a) why can't I find it on the web site?

(b) who is the OEM?

(c) if Stream Theory had a $9m deal, why did they sell out to Tadpole for paper? And a leveraged buy-out at that.

(d) why is Steig Westerberg dumping stock for trivial amounts of cash?

None of this makes sense to me -- unless the whole thing is cash-starved.

The only people involved in this company who are putting cash in are Gem, with massive dilution and a rapid exit following.


On edit: Hang on, I've done some research, Moneylender will be pleased to hear.

So Tadpole bought a privately-held company with a turnover of $1.6m, a loss of $0.4m, and net liabilities of $0.7m. With 10 employees. And they paid $25m in paper plus a leverage fee on future earnings (not that there will be any).

Then, Mr Steig of the Dump, now he has stock in a public company, starts to dump stock for small amounts of money (like $10k) -- because now he can -- to pay "a tax bill".

IMHO, Tadpole have been had. Mr Steig has liberated himself and his worthless company into $25m of public, tradeable stock from a zero-cash company on the basis of a a $9m deal that will never yield a brass cent.

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Mr Steig Westerberg, my nomination for dealmaker of the year -- at least for him.

MM you are too polite .... these are , and , always have been , a crock of sh*te ... regardless of what some of these ramping tw*ts would have you believe.

I only say it as I see it :-)

Dil: read my edited mail 1480 above. And thank you, I try to be polite, although it can be a struggle sometimes.

I just don't bother try any more but I guess you just haven't noticed :-)

MM&Dil-I don`t know how you keep your patience, its magnificent

lol

ROFLOL!

Bring back the 'banned' Tadpole threads I say, or their could be mutiny at the NE traders meeting next week :-))

Moneylender/Yuff have you noticed how 'she' is trading south of the 50 and 200 moving averages with the threat of further gem drawdowns on the horizon.

She'll be trading down as low as a 1969 sherbert dip before too long :-))

should TAD go below 5p I will be in for another million. I seriously believe this is a major potential player, and I have been in and out many times over the years since it first came to the market, but it is only recently that I have seen their REAL capability.

snakey:

OK, let's hear it: what is "their REAL capability"?

Also, since the company came to market, its profile has completely changed. Does its history have any bearing on its future?

MM

relax MM its a well known double alias.

Ollie

You know all about aliases!
Just look at what you have done to 3i's

M

Bust by xmas imo.

LOL
I just love TAD people , the co. is going bust and all they can do is to moan on about a pitiful bb(iii), which pretends all is well, and blames the collapse on the posters who take the pee out of them- theres one here now posting about aliases at midnight, will they ever get lives?.
Have to say its sooo funny seeing them trying to guess whom all the near -named people are, particularly as I have personally telephoned iii and they assure me they are all different people, they don`t allow multiple aliases,
but of course TAdders can`t believe that more than one person can see it going bust soon, marvellous entertainment.
I expect the reason this thread is so quiet is the fault of multiple aliases too

amazing!!!!

Mighty Micro, their REAL capability now lies in the streaming of their software. Not just games but the systems they originally developed as pure sell out software, for remote communication and I know that what they offer has a tremendous potential in the construction industry let alone numerous other avenues that they are knowledgeable enough to be pursuing. They may owe lots of money and be dependant upon particular `bankers` (i.e. GEM)but what they have is pure software gold, IMHO and not necessarily humble.

piffle pure and simple, yet another unsubstantiated ramp

snakey, tadpole is below 5p, so are you going to buy a million?
Why not phone Steig and do the deal directly, I'm sure he'll be more than happy to flog you a million at 4.75p.
Or was it all hot air?

Some people seem to live on another planet! MY real worry is not that Tad will go bankrupt (I am assuming it will) but that it has world-beating software and STILL goes bankrupt (that is criminal in my books).

pach
How can it go bankrupt in less than 2 years, they have a 4.5m facilty with GEM and lost 400k in a a normally weaker H1.
Thats without taking into account the extra SB( $3.3m)at the end of the year.
The funding is fine thats why the board actually reduced the dependency on GEM over the next year from 40m shares to 20m shares.

ps I see iii has been cleaned up, all that hard work by Iain just vanished in a puff of smoke, deary deary me, what will he do next w/end LOL

hahahah, yuff-yuff, yuff
iii is " cleaned up", well that should REALLY help all the mugs who are heavily into TAD, you really must get focussed on the fact that it will be worth nothing soon- and then we can watch YOU getting cleaned out, rather than up, and we will all have a wry smile, some may even laugh out loud on iii too,

ROFLOL!!!!

WELL DONE III TAD.L yuff 7
for clearing up the mess that has been created by one person who does not have anything better to do.
Unfortunately multiple aliases will leave a trail all back to the same computer and thats why they are able to do something about it.
------------

Well they still let me in yuffer- maybe you totally got the wrong aliases miXed up-AGAIN!!!!!!!!,i TOLD YOU i ONLY HAD ONE
roflmfao!!!!!!!!!
--Re: Re: Grow Up! TAD.L Mr Lew
RL,
Ain't it ironic, i actually recced your post. Total mistake, i was reaching for the respond button and missed, BLAST ! :-(
Please don't include me in your clone lists and be careful in what you say, my lawyers are itching for a libel case.
regards
mrlew
...
Careful who you libel yuff.

Yuff - I gave no time-frame for bankruptcy ... simply that the current mess that Tad finds itself in can only lead reasonable people to conclude that bankruptcy is the natural next stage. I sincerely hope it does not happen (as I hold shares - ave'd at 5.89p) but I see very little evidence of recurring hard cash. Promises are worthless (we have had that for years) - profitable performance is required NOW.