bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
garyble
- 20 Mar 2006 16:27
- 15721 of 27111
SD,
It will be a "co-investment" so depends on the split. If 50/50 SEO needs to fund $17.5m less 5 x $1.25 = $11.25 {6.4m}.
You see, the figure is going down all the time!
garyble
- 20 Mar 2006 16:44
- 15722 of 27111
So, putting 2+2 together here, it would appear that SEO are definitely going after the WM tray that needs 75,000 tonnes of plastic.
How fast is a WM "fast track"?
stockdog
- 20 Mar 2006 17:03
- 15723 of 27111
About 3gsmpa, lol!
lindos
- 20 Mar 2006 17:13
- 15724 of 27111
Thanks everyone
lindos
JJS
- 20 Mar 2006 17:13
- 15725 of 27111
Hello garyble,
The proactiveinvestors note is new out today, it was complied this weekend.
"How fast is a WMT fast-track ?"
"Several years ago, growth in case-ready red-meat packaging surged to double-digit rates as processors scrambled to supply Wal-Mart SuperCenters chain-wide conversion while some retailers accelerated long-standing programs"
"Morgan Stanley Dean Witter singles out Wal-Mart as the single largest retail driving force"
"In early 2002, Wal-Mart had--by far--the leading position in case-ready meat retailing, selling more than half of all domestic case-ready meats--1 billion units"
"Historically, Wal-Mart has been tremendously influential in bringing new technology to the retail industry. The Arkansas-based retailer was behind barcodings success. It was only after Wal-Mart demanded that suppliers use the technology that other retailers started putting barcodes on their products."
WAL-MART spurs case-ready meat. unit-dose drugs
Wal-Mart does not set packaging policy for consumer packaged goods companies. But due to its sheer size and adoption of certain packaging systems, its a big driver of packaging trends.
Here are two examples of how Wal-Mart is influencing the direction of packaging.
Case-ready meat. Almost single-handedly, Wal-Mart has fueled the growth of case-ready red meat. This includes ground beef and cuts of beef, pork and veal.
Through its Supercenters and Neighborhood Markets, Wal-Mart distributes about 1.5 to 2 billion packages of case-ready red meat or about half of the total units of case-ready meat in the United States.
Wal-Marts case-ready meats are packed in modified-atmosphere trays with a high-oxygen content (80 percent oxygen/20 percent carbon dioxide), according to a report, How Wal-Mart is Reshaping Packaging, from PakIntell.
There are numerous competing technologies for case-ready. Wal-Marts selection of the high-oxygen environment, based largely on its experiences in Europe, recast the marketand fortunesfor numerous vendors, says the report.
Some observers believe that Wal-Mart is pushing for a standardized tray size for all its case-ready red meat to streamline its merchandising and display.
n Unit-dose drug packaging. Wal-Mart is taking the lead role in urging pharmaceutical suppliers to switch from amber plastic vials to unit-dose, blister packaging for prescription drugs, says the PakIntell report.
The retailer believes unit-dose blisters will help consumers with dosage compliance, provide more information on the packaging and establish brand loyalty.
As a result of Wal-Marts initiative, some drug companies are taking a hard look at unit-dose packaging for new products. They are focusing on new products because of regulatory hurdles to changing the packaging of an existing product, says Bill LeMaire, Managing Director of PakIntell and author of the report.
garyble
- 20 Mar 2006 17:48
- 15726 of 27111
Lol sd,
I would say its was at least 4gsmpa!
stockdog
- 20 Mar 2006 19:11
- 15727 of 27111
JJs - there is something unmistakablke about the style of your last post - can't quite put my finger on it - it'll come to me, no doubt.
"Wal-Marts case-ready meats are packed in modified-atmosphere trays with a high-oxygen content (80 percent oxygen/20 percent carbon dioxide)" This may make the meat look red, but high nitrogen has to be better to preserve it in edible condition, surely?
"dosage compliance, provide more information on the packaging and establish brand loyalty." So WM are taking the lead in ecological values again I see!
NielsJensen
- 20 Mar 2006 19:47
- 15728 of 27111
SD, I had that feeling as well ...
Could it be our old friend?
garyble
- 20 Mar 2006 20:24
- 15729 of 27111
Uncanny!
bosley
- 20 Mar 2006 20:27
- 15730 of 27111
well you lot took your time !!
hewittalan6
- 20 Mar 2006 21:25
- 15731 of 27111
Erm. I'm still not there.
Am I stupid? No, i think I just worked it out.
You lot are all Masters on guessing.
Alan
kimoldfield
- 20 Mar 2006 22:32
- 15732 of 27111
Nice one Alan! :-)
kim
tweenie
- 20 Mar 2006 23:00
- 15733 of 27111
ah. time to take things with a hefty pinch of salt.- AGAIN
Will see what the AM beings.
be lucky
greekman
- 21 Mar 2006 07:54
- 15734 of 27111
News item on BBC this am, showing evidence that the chances of cancer being caused by plastics is far higher than previously thought. Yet another continuing scare story ( does not mean it's not true ) that will effect petroleum based plastics use.
oblomov
- 21 Mar 2006 09:58
- 15735 of 27111
From the article on proactiveinvestors.com :-
It certainly would make sense to at the very least split the RF and Starch businesses into two separate entities and allow them to be valued by the market on their own merits.A split of the companys two core divisions looks almost a certainty in the not too distant future.'
Does anyone have any ideas on the liklihood of this and how it might affect shareholders?
kimoldfield
- 21 Mar 2006 10:34
- 15736 of 27111
A split may not be such a bad idea, I feel that SEO's reputation has been slightly tainted by the problems with Greenseal and although there will be a surge in machine sales now (unless something else goes wrong!) the Starch business IMO is the 'Star' and a separation will give it a higher profile.
kim
kimoldfield
- 21 Mar 2006 10:35
- 15737 of 27111
Two sets of shares, both doing well, wouldn't be such a bad thing!?!
garyble
- 21 Mar 2006 10:36
- 15738 of 27111
Oblo,
I see splitting the business as only a quick and easy route to increased funding. GS and starpol, though not completely symbiotic, are complementary.
with AEI and Premier available in the States and presumably a standard model for the "Micro-manufacturing" plant, I don't see the need to split the business.
Once the novelty of GS wears off, I believe the license fee approach will dry up, especially as the competition improves so starpol will be key {A single tray for WM equates to 112m pa.....how many more such trays?}.
The new FD has been brought in to do just the right juggling to see the company through this most crucial of phases.
tweenie
- 21 Mar 2006 10:58
- 15739 of 27111
Whilst it's a pleasant change , having new topics of conversation, I think we're getting a bit ahead of ourselves-- or being led down the garden path.
If at some future date the shares are split then all fare and well (Though personally I think the two halves of business compliment each other). what would be good for the SP and my spirits woud be some hard earned cash on bottom line instead of 'more jam tomorrow'.
I don't mean to piss on anyones fire , but.... we are all still waiting .
show me the money!!!!!!!!
kimoldfield
- 21 Mar 2006 11:00
- 15740 of 27111
Yes, you are right Tweenie. Come on Howard, tell us something! Show us the airplane ticket was worth the money!!
kim