for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

I'm also with Shamona although I thought the poster was a laydee!!!!! OOpppsss.... Either way accurate posts and has ridden the profit out of SEO with some very well timed buys / sells.

I also agree PM1 is a fool, I had plenty of arguements with that one ramping on. Its only a shame Blinger isn't still around, there are some on this thread that would have got on with his shorting!!

shamona never tells you about the times he gets it wrong, and nobody, even PM1, is 100% right 100% of the time, so stop talking drivel PLEASE !

If you want to crawl up shamona's bum that will be your loss.

See you all on Monday.

JJS 'and nobody, even PM1, is 100% right 100% of the time'

Not even PM1?

See you Monday, Paul.

You might see me, but I won't see you. I thank the gods of MAM for the squelch, you just aren't worth conversing with, you have PM1 on the one brain cell.


Users you currently have squelched

oblomov remove
shamona remove

Thought you'd already gone! lol

Posting of the squelch list look awfully familiar!!

The same as yours !

wahhhhhay !

I notice shamona and Oblomov don't mention AEX up from 8p to nearly 50p, or that many people made a lot of money on LGB, and got out before the suspension, those still in might still make more than they put in. Shame about EVS, but as *** said when he Emailed them round, it was not his research so do your own, the research in fact was done by PapalPower on AD**N

So in between shamona and Oblomov we have a 'target *** with as much negative unsubstantiated schpeel as possible', the same campaign they have been running against *** for at least a year(he tells me), what are THEIR motives ???

I do not want to read their drivel.

What a strange idea this squelching is - like reading a newspaper but only reading the parts you want to hear! Maybe thats the same criteria you apply to your SEO research.

I dont believe for one moment either of you have sqelched anyone- - if you are at all normal you wouldn't want to miss what ANYONE had to say! Good weekend to all - I'm off now.

SHAMONA

SINCERE APOLOGIES. I was getting you mixed up in my own mind with Blinger.

The oily one

Blinger - he's a different kettle of fish! (Seq, Stainco.etc.)

Have you really squelched me, though, Gary? Most offended if you have.

When you've all finished decicing who are the "good guys" and who are "bad", I'd like to thank E W Robson for his incisive posts.

Sorry, but EWRobson is the thinking man's ramper.

Shamona,bos, hewittalan6 LOLS. Spot on.

Blinger could be abrasive but when Robson and
others were ramping when the sp was in the 20s
and predicting further rises without problems,
Blinger and II (for their own reasons or otherwise)
called it right from circa 28 to 14.

Not a problem, zscrooge. That was a bad call, I admit. Got around 20p average, eventually, but that was a costly exercise. Never have I made so much on a run up or lost so much on the run down. But its interesting that the bulls, like me, rarely get out at the right time but , equally, the bears, like II still call it down after the tide has turned. Back in when it recovered from 12p to 15p on basis that tide had turned only for it to ebb back to 12.5p. The problem has been that you haven't been able to take either company announcements or analysts views at face value. But I have a fixation with SEO; I love their technological acumen; I sympathise with their commercial naivete; I want to be in when they roar into the FTSE 250. I think its called an addiction.

Eric

?

so now you're claiming to have insider knowledge?

talks with WM did complete this week so it is not hard to guess plus the agm stated news very shortly.

roll on monday, shame I don't get paid till next week........
hopefully NOT more jam tommorrow..............

Personally, I don't think anyone can crow about calling it right with any consistency at all. II and Bling were calling it as a dead cert short in December at 12p to be shorted to 10p and everyone else was calling it long from 20p down to its current 13p.
Its an enigmatic share with the potential of being a world beater or a disaster in the making. In a former career, I would have urged that it made up <5% of your portfolio, which in turn made up <10% of your assets. It is simply too small to resist being tossed around on the waves of sentiment. The sideways momentum of it over recent months, despite the apparent lack of headway and the backtracking on earlier promises is testament to either the huge untapped potential or the efficacy of the rose tinted specs that PI's tend to wear. I hope its the former, I know Bos thinks its the latter.
For my sins, I think the sp is fair value. I see it as neither a buy, nor a sell until we see real news. And with such a small company, an RNS that was either solidly good or very bad would see the wave of sentiment be a tsunami to be ridden, or to drown the lot of us.
Summed up best by the old adage "not for widows and orphans".
Alan