The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

tabasco,

At least when I talk I don't accuse others of being dishonest, then am unable to back it up when challenged!

The paranoia of bulls of stocks such as MDX is generally born out of many people having too large a position in a high risk stock without actually understanding the risks, then flailing around blaming all and sundry, except themselves, when it goes wrong.

You are a typical BB poster I am afraid, you resort to attacking the poster because you are unable to debate the issue!

Plenty of people on this site debate we also have a laughyour first remark..that letter is ridiculous is not a debate!it is a remark from a person that has not the slightest interest in the companyat that point I lost interest in you
I can personally see plenty of problems with mdx but not involving fundamentalsthe company have made me a great deal of money in the pastand so I am in love with themthey are about to make myself and others a great deal moreif you have been sent along to derampgo ahead.feel free! There you go debate over!

The letter could be written for many AIM listed companies, you are backing it because it backs up a company you have invested in.

frankly, I think it will be dismissed, there are valid points raised but it is spoiled by an obvious bias towards one stock in particular, rather than the market in general.

Unless otherwise stated surely any comment on here is the opinion of the poster concerned?

AndyI never said I was backing the lettermerely that it highlighted many worrying pointsExcellent postlong but worth a read.I agree in as much as the letter could have been written for a number of AIM listed companiesI feel imho mdx is the best example.

The full story of this company is shrouded my mysticand whilst I back RT at this pointhe must take some responsibility for the lack of clarity shown to us.

Lol been making friends again over the weekend tabby ?

The guy is right , that letter is a load of b*llox .

DilI dont suppose you have even glanced at the letterI know what is coming from youand it is usually crap ishthe other guy wanted a partand he didnt pass the audition

Yes I did tabby , then came to the conclusion that the guy was probably a loony and the letter is a load of b*llox (see my previous post just after your copy and paste from advfn).

Asked a question too but got no answer from you.

Dilwe have had the SP manipulation debate so many timescan we just beg to differ? For those that have an interest in mdx and the SPI thought the letter would be worth a read.nothing more nothing less!

It aint being manipulated tabby , only in the minds of the loonies does it appear to be.

Dil you live in Wales where a sheep is a sheep.in the City we would be made to believe a sheep is a woolly dog.
According to the FSA, there were "informed price movements" -- potentially a sign of insider dealing -- around 28.7 percent of all merger and acquisition announcements involving FTSE 100 companies last year, up from 28.6 percent in 2006 and 23.7 percent in 2005... Who gives a fu*k about the AIMFSA have arrested eight recentlycant be for manipulating prices"Heavens to Murgatroyd!" everyones honest.ask Dil he knows a sheep when he sees one

lol

this was posted on advfn, and I hope it's a joke and wasn't really sent to the LSE or FSA.



Thank you for your email

I should be grateful for more specific information regarding your
suspicions of manipulation including details of the specific
transactions you believe to be manipulative.

Kind regards

The Market Abuse Team

-----Original Message-----
From: XX
Sent: 04 August 2008 18:38
To: Market Abuse
Subject: Meldex International

Dear Sirs

no doubt you have had many emails re the above company. Well as an
investor I am sick of your terrible lack of power. I am writing to my
local MP immediately and having this matter discussed. This company is
being totally manipulated as you sit and watch

I look forward to a better than standard reply

Morning all.Andyis there such a section called The Market Abuse Team or The PI Abuse Team there certainly should be!. Unfortunately cant own up to it being my masterpiecethe skill and judgment needed to exercise in how the issues both legal and factual are presented are way above my level.sorry!

tabasco,

It is sad when people, in some caes without much investment experience, (judging by some of the posts on ADVFN), have become so convinced they are right that they begin to complain to the authorities when the position moves against them.

IMO there has been a general sell off of AIM listed stocks for quite a whie now, and amongst some of the reasons I see for this are; fund redemptions, CFD's closing, margin calls on leveraged positions, and general selling as people lose faith with the market., or need the money for something else.

MDX is a stock mostly owned by PI's rather than institutions, so I would expect more volatility, and I would imagine many people are using margin here, then I would expect increased volatility.

I think what you have to consider is why nobody complains when shares are rising "exuberantly"?

If I received that email, it would be consigned to the "Piss Poor English" folder, and ignored.... no doubt the FSA (bless 'em) would've done the same.....

Andyyour view..and mine come to think of it is purely conjecture...you can only work from the limited information mdx release these daysmost investors value the SP considerably higher than the current levelto see which of our views are correctI am sure will not take much longerBM has gone mighty quite on adv.. something is brewing!

Most PIs don't have the first scooby of how to value a stock, which comes as no surprise as the majority of so called analysts don't either!! :-)

Nice to see you BertPTI guess on that assumption most PIs are not very successfulhhmmm?

Probably a fair assumption Tabby, certainly 95% or so of Traders don't make the grade. I guess it also depends on how you define success; could be defined by not losing money, not losing an awful lot of money, making a small amount of money or perhaps outperforming fund managers. I think I would go with the latter, not much point in doing it yourself if the 'experts' can do it better, although more fun!

Cant argue your point PT dont have stats in front of me.. do have a few successful investors as friends I scratch a living myself and as you know Ive always maintained Im luckyperhaps Ive found my grade?.. it is also a whole lotta fun