for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Can't think of anything worse than recycled bog roll!!!
Asda.co.uk has an about us section and on there is a complete breakdown of their environmental policies and how they are acheiving them as well as precise targets for the environment.
Strangely, one of the things the environmentalists are concerned about is putting starch based plastic onto cardboard boxes. They argue it should be one or the other. The cardboard will not compost due to the waxy surface and the plastic would contaminate the paper recycling, so you achieve a product that takes 2 good materials and makes it landfill fodder.
The answer could lie in WRAP 100 and Starpol as a combination, but WTFDIK.
Alan

WDFDYK? about as much as SEO themselves it would seem!

No rocket science there, cynic.
No-one interested in this stock would not check Asdas environmental policy or what environmentalists think about biodegradable packaging or, indeed the competition as part of their research. The Wrap and Starpol combination is just an educated guess. For all I know, wrap would not RF to Starpol.
If anyone is interested in this stock and hasn't doen even that basic research I suggest they revisit their research and start again!!
Aldwickks post was lifted straight from a discussion forum about Sainsburys announcement. I think it was on the AOL blog, so the contributors are hardly likely to be well informed of the possible alternatives and the plans other supermarkets have in the pipeline.
Alan

Hush Alan! ..... it was only a gentle tease by me ..... In truth, a huge amount of money and everything else could be save if packaging was just plain sensible ..... ever unpacked a PC or similar ..... aaaarrrrgggghhhh!

May I suggest frogpack!!!

ALAN RIGHT ON TARGET////

as i have no idea at all what frogpack is, i am afraid the comment/taunt or whatever completely passed me by

cynic

You profess to be knowledgeable about SEO by your regular posts of your views of SEO and it's problems. as some might perceive them. Yet you have no idea of what Frogpack is.

Clearly your views and depth of knowledge do not even extend to looking at SEO's web site's Home Page to see what it's products might be.

Good job I don't look to you for my research into my investments!

i have no knoiwledge at all about SEO .... i only follow this thread because i cannot believe the huge number of posts and seeming following when the stock does nothing but head south.

if there was more headroom above ZERO i would have shorted this stock ..... buying it? .... heaven forbid; i know better ways of losing it like buying mature Ch d'Yquem, but at least that has a sweet taste on its way down.

less cynic ....... and more pillick!

The oily one

Oily - LOL

You do (or at least I do) usually get an instinctive idea about a posters credentials well before they reveal their real worth as a poster on this information BB.

I wont go into names or current suspects - not necessary, we all sence them!

no probs .... keep mocking all you like while the rust and moth and SEO keep depleting your funds ..... if SEO actually manage to pull themselves out of the fire before the receivers move in, then i am delighted for you and will take no offense at being pilloried or worse ..... as it stands, the market looks to have got it correct, as most times it does, and keeps marking the shares down.

cynic

If, as you say "the market LOOKS to have got it correct" that means you are telling us all your assessment of the facts and position but you admit to having absolutely no knowledge of facts about what you are passing judgement on - SEO.

Sorry, but communicating with you about the company is therefore a waste of time. Goodbye. EOC.

suit yourself ..... you money to lose .... the trend is DOWN DOWN DOWN and you don't need to be a rocket scientist let alone know anything about the company itself ..... the market, which knows plenty about the company, is rarely wrong in these things

Well put Tony, Sainsburys green issue mentioned in the Mail on Saturday. Can anyone post relevant articals in the other press, as I was painting all day Sunday (dawn till dusk)

Point of order, your honour.
If the market usually gets it right, can someone please explain to me, in words I can understand, why the winners and losers list every day is topped by movements in excess of 50%?
If the markets had got it right, there would be no suprises and no big daily swings, just gentle movement of prices that were predictable and in one direction only.
Just the observations of an uninformed investor here I'm afraid.
Alan

Second point of order, your honour.
If the markets usually get it right then they must have got it right as SEO climbed to 30p, and be wrong now. Or got it wrong on the climb and got it right now. Or have decided to take bulls for a ride then but not bears now. Or decided to take bears for a ride now, but not bulls.
I submit, your honour, that the market gets it right about 50% of the time.
So does a coin toss. Don't know where tossing comes itno it though.
Alan

Another point of order, your honour.

Could the previous poster please leave words like "sotting" of this board. It makes it hard for dyslexic people like me to understand what he is talking about.

The oily one

carry on rationalising guys ..... i dare say the end of the year or Q1 2007 will bring the denouement one way or another ..... i am more than happy to stand up and take flak if i am wrong, but are you?

Most certainly. But it is very hard to be wrong when almost every post one makes has the caveat on it that people should DYOR and that what I know makes me more more confident but................
It is also tough to be wrong when one posts that they may be wrong, and they would not encourage anyone to buy as it is too risky yet, etc.etc.
Thats the difference. Humility.
Alan