Who Did 9-11?

Source


(1) Verifiable empirical fact: There are many corroborating sources that reported molten steel in the ruins of the World Trade Center. Another excellent summary of reports, ranging from "cherry red steel" (about 745 degrees C) at a depth of six stories underground that was found six weeks after the attacks, to a steel beam "dripping with the molten steel" to "streams" and "rivers" of molten steel, may be found here at the George Washington blog. The latter includes a link to a New York Times archived article (pay-per-view) stating that Dr. Jonathan Barnett, a professor of fire protection engineering, said that an uncontrollable fire could not explain steel members in the WTC 7 debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures. The History Bytes blog has yet another first-class summary with a number of named first-hand eyewitness accounts featuring quotes such as "massive amounts of molten steel".

Mark Loizeaux of Controlled Demolition, Inc. of Phoenix, MD., who was involved in the removal of the rubble, was reported as saying that molten steel was found at the basement levels in the ruins of World Trade Center buildings 1, 2 and 7. This was confirmed by journalist William Langewiesche who personally witnessed areas where "steel flowed in molten streams" after "descending deep below street level" (subscribers only link here, but see above George Washington blog for the quotes). As late as February 2002, Bronx firefighter Joe "Toolie" O'Toole saw a crane lift a steel beam vertically from deep within the catacombs of Ground Zero. "It was dripping from the molten steel," he said. Some molten material would have been aluminum, but analysis confirmed significant quantities of iron. Since the existence of molten steel or iron cannot be denied, NIST has even made a (failed) attempt to address the matter in its recently released "FAQ"- scroll down to #13 at this link. Molten steel or iron was also observed pouring from the side of WTC 2 in the minutes prior to its collapse [see pp. 10-16 in the paper at this link].

(2) Consequence of the laws of physics: At most, the mass of steel that could be melted by a hydrocarbon-fuelled office compartment fire would be on the order of lengths of fine steel wire. A stoichiometric combustion of kerosene, generally regarded as dodecane, for example...

C12H26 + 18.5O2 +69.595N2 ===> 12CO2 + 13H2O + 69.595N2 + 7518 kJ

...would have at best the above 7,518 kJ locked into 2.712 kg of combustion products to yield an adiabatic flame temperature (AFT) of some 2,398 K or 2,125 C (it is about 130 K less after including the inevitable endothermic dissociation reactions at these temperatures in order to reach an equilibrium state). At standard temperature and pressure, one mole of an ideal gas occupies 22.4 liters; at 2,398 K the volume would have expanded by a factor of 2398/273, i.e. nearly 9 times, to 196.8 liters/mol. The 7.518 MJ is spread amongst 94.595 moles or 18.62 cubic meters of hot gaseous products. At some 0.146 kg/m^3, these are much lighter than air at STP. In order to melt a mere 1 kg of steel that would take up a volume of only 0.127 liters, at least 1 MJ would be required. If 1/7.518 of the enthalpy (heat) in the products was directed at the kilogram of steel, the temperature rise would be reduced from 2,105 K to a little above 1,825 K which would result in a temperature of a little over 1,845 C and still potentially hot enough to melt some steel. But in real-world conditions, flame and upper layer hot gas temperatures are well below the AFT, typically barely reaching 1,000 C and certainly well below the melting point of steel. Heat radiates out in all directions, and would not be concentrated just at some particular 0.127 liter lump of steel. And the jet fuel fires in the WTC would have burnt out within a few minutes. The remaining combustible office material would have released lower quantities of heat per unit mass of fuel, and the AFTs would have been lower. Consequently, flame temperatures would have been lower for a given proportion of heat losses to the surroundings.

Moreover, the oxygen-starved fuel-rich environment of the compartment fire would have reduced the temperature increase and the heat yielded per unit of fuel by a factor of about one-third. And a report, authored by a team of engineers commissioned by Silverstein Properties, concluded that fire temperatures in the WTC were even lower than typical fully-developed office fires. The fires were inhibited by dust and debris distributed by the impacts, and the study placed the temperatures at between 750 F and 1300 F (about 400 C to 700 C). Following collapse, low air exchange rates in the rubble pile would lead to low mass burning rates, poor combustion efficiency and low power output. A few smoldering pieces of wood could not create temperatures capable of melting steel.

If it were possible for hydrocarbon fires to melt significant quantities of steel, then burnt-out cars would regularly be observed consisting primarily of solidified pools of molten steel on the ground, and kerosene heaters would be about as useful as a chocolate teapot!

As for the kinetic energy available from the massive collapse, this is given by:

KE = 0.5*m*v^2

...and if all of this was converted to heat and remained within the material, the temperature increase is given by:

T2 - T1 = 0.5*m*v^2 / (c*m) = 0.5*v^2 / c

where c is the specific heat of the material.

The masses cancel, with the temperature increase determined merely by the velocity and the specific heat. At 200 mph = 89.4 m/s, and taking c for steel as 450 J/kg.K, the increase in temperature is:

0.5 * 89.4^2 / 450 = 8.88 degrees K. (The concrete would be cooler; its specific heat is nearly twice that of steel.)

400,000 tonnes distributed over an area of more than 4,000 square meters averages less than 100 tonnes per square meter. There would not be spots that were so much hotter than the mean that rivers of molten steel were formed. If a couple of trucks collided head-on, tens of tons of mass would be distributed over a cross-section of a few square meters and - in contrast to the WTC collapse - the impact would be very sharply concentrated over tens of milliseconds, yet the steel would not melt as in a scene from a Terminator movie. And a 200 mph terminal velocity corresponds to faster than free-fall speed, which itself would be evidence of controlled demolition.

As for the idea that molten aluminum from a plane might have reacted with water from fire hoses and produced an exothermic reaction and just might have transferred all this heat to steel in the rubble, this theory is not only inapplicable to WTC 7, but fails to work for the towers. If ten tonnes of aluminum was in the form of a cube of volume 3.7 cubic meters and sides of 1.547 meters, the problem for the official theory is that little of it would melt in the fires, due to the relatively low surface area to mass ratio and the relatively low emissivity of aluminum at around 0.1. Alternatively, suppose this ten tonnes had been smashed into 3,700,000 cubes of length 0.01 meters and volume 1 cc. If they happened to be dispersed without lying on top of each other so as to present the maximum surface area for absorption, they might indeed all melt if the fires were sufficiently severe. But even if surrounded by concrete debris, they would not remain molten for more than a matter of minutes.

(3) Conclusion from (1) and (2): The WTC steel was melted by a type of combustion such as a thermite reaction, as opposed to hydrocarbon fires of office combustibles ignited by jet fuel.

(4) Conclusion from (3): WTC 1, 2 and 7 were subjected to controlled demolitions involving pre-installed charges. As corroborating evidence, pre-2001 studies found that the Towers would survive a 600 mph impact from a jetliner, and predicted that the buildings would remain standing even if all of the jet fuel had been dumped inside and ignited a horrendous fire that killed many people.

(5) Verifiable empirical facts: Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy (both Jewish) took over the WTC lease and $3 to $7 billion insurance policies - and made damned sure the policies covered acts of terrorism - a mere six weeks prior to 9/11. Silverstein had close ties to Ariel Sharon, Ehud Barak, and Benjamin Netanyahu - all Israeli Prime Ministers. Netanyahu used to call Silverstein every Sunday afternoon, New York time, without fail. Lewis Eisenberg (Jewish), chairman of the Port Authority, oversaw negotiations which handed the lease to Silverstein and Lowy. Both Eisenberg and Silverstein held leadership positions with the United Jewish Appeal, a billion-dollar Zionist "charity" organization. Larry Silverstein conveniently had a "dermatologist's appointment" on the morning of 9/11 rather than taking his customary breakfast at the Windows on the World restaurant at the top of the North Tower, thereby avoiding the fate of nearly three thousand WTC occupants. Netanyahu is linked to both 9/11 and the London 7/7 bombings. Israeli and Jewish supremacists and fascists have a long history of terrorism and false flag attacks such as the King David hotel (1946), the Lavon Affair (1954), the USS Liberty (1967), Operation Trojan in Tripoli (1986), Oklahoma City (1995), etc. Rabbi Dov Zakheim (Jewish) "lost" - i.e. embezzled - over $2 trillion during his tenure as Comptroller of the Pentagon in the months leading up to 9/11. From 1997 to 2001 he was CEO of a company that made transceivers for the simultaneous remote control of up to eight aircraft, or the remote takeover of planes already in flight. The first arrests within hours of the 9/11 attacks were the five "dancing Israelis", Mossad agents dressed as Arabs who were found with box cutters, $4,700 cash hidden in a sock, foreign passports, a van which tested positive for traces of explosives, and were seen filming and celebrating the attacks with "high fives" and shouts of joy and mockery. These agents were eventually released by Michael Chertoff (Jewish). The Zim American-Israeli Shipping Company (Israeli-owned) inexplicably broke its lease to move out of WTC 1 just days before 9/11, having to pay a $50,000 fine as a result. Within a few months of 9/11, it moved back to New York from Pennsylvania. Odigo (Israeli company) and Goldman Sachs (Israeli company) received advance warnings of the 9/11 attacks. Some of the alleged hijackers, who were said to be devout Muslims, were seen on gambling boats belonging to Jack Abramoff (Jewish).

(6) Conclusion from (4) and (5): The evidence shows that Israel and Judeo-fascists orchestrated 9/11, either working under the Rothschild Mafia or as an out-of-control monster created by the House of Rothschild. They did not merely play a central role, they actually did it! The motive included press-ganging the armed services of other nations into fighting wars as Israel's proxy army on a false prospectus. One target was Israel's overt foe Iraq in a war to the value of hundreds of billions of dollars and a cost to the proxy armies of thousands of lives needlessly sacrificed. As Mahathir Mohamad shrewdly observed in an October 2003 speech shortly before retiring as Malaysia's prime minister, Jews rule the world by proxy, and get others to fight and die for them.

(7) Verifiable empirical facts: Jewish leaders regularly describe non-Jews as equivalent to "grasshoppers", "beasts", "crocodiles", etc. The Jewish Talmud, a hate-filled supremacist tract, states that Jews may kill, rob and lie to non-Jews, sanctions paedophilia, and advocates the genocide of non-Jews.

(8) Conclusion from (6) and (7): Israel and Judeo-fascists are not only guilty of 9/11, they are the only group with a sufficiently perverted morality and lack of conscience and empathy for fellow human beings, that would be capable of perpetrating such a cold-blooded act of mass-murder for profit. Governments could not persuade operatives to mass-murder thousands of their compatriots in controlled skyscraper demolitions. The Bush administration's complicity in crashing a remote-controlled projectile into the Pentagon's west wing, together with Israel's Dolphin-class submarines equipped with nuclear-tipped cruise missiles with a 900-mile range, its various spy-rings' gatherings of secrets with which to blackmail politicians and its control of the mainstream media, provided Israel with the necessary leverage that would force the US authorities to cover for Netanyahu/Zakheim's Pentagon embezzlement and Netanyahu/Zakheim/Silverstein's WTC controlled demolition $3+ billion insurance scam and pretext for perpetual war - a "war on terror". The irony of that will not have been lost on Netanyahu, he was the principal architect of the doctrine of a "war on terror" that in reality was the pretext for state-sponsored terrorism for profit. Just because someone was nominally born as a Jew, it does not mean that they necessarily have an "evil gene" and cannot be their own person. Zionist Occupied Governments (ZOGs) assert without evidence that terrorism is carried out by "Islamic extremists" or "Islamo-fascists". The evidence demonstrates that there exists, within Judaism, a fanatical, evil sect of Judeo-fascists, who are the true terrorists. Those appeasers and accessories who deny the crimes of Israel are part of the problem, not the solution. They should be drummed out of the truth movement forthwith.




Global Technology Partners - William Perry: seated, centre. John M. Deutch: centre, top row, in blue sweater, standing behind William Perry. Ashton B. Carter: top row, first on the left.


"Neither Jewish morality nor Jewish tradition can be used to disallow terror as a means of war... We are very far from any moral hesitations when concerned with the national struggle. First and foremost, terror is for us a part of the political war appropriate for the circumstances of today..."

Yitzhak Shamir - Former Israeli Prime Minister


The 9-11 Gang: Exposing The Criminal Zionist Network Behind 9-11 And the 'War On Terror'

Written by Christopher Bollyn


Sixty-five years ago today Japanese bombers launched an early morning surprise attack on the U.S. fleet at Pearl Harbor killing some 2,400 seamen and bringing the United States into World War II. The next day, President Franklin D. Roosevelt called December 7, 1941 "a date which will live in infamy" as he asked Congress for a declaration of war against Japan. September 11, 2001 is another date which will live in infamy. Like the attack on Pearl Harbor, 9/11 was a surprise attack to most Americans - but not all.

Like the Japanese attack on the U.S. fleet, 9/11 was a catastrophic and transforming event that brought the United States into war - the so-called "War on Terror."

Unlike Pearl Harbor, however, 9/11 was not committed by an easily identifiable foe. Pronouncements by President George W. Bush and senior government officials notwithstanding, the solid evidence pinning the blame for the catastrophic terror attacks of 9/11 on 19 Arabs with box cutters has yet to be seen.

Despite the various government sponsored reports and commissions about the events of September 11, 2001, the attacks and the destruction they caused remain uninvestigated. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has not released the evidence that it has or should have to support the stated position of the government that 19 Arabs working with Al Qaida carried out these attacks on their own.

To this day, the FBI has not even provided the physical evidence to identify the aircraft involved in the attacks, although there must be an adequate number of identifiable airplane parts from the four crash sites to do so. The FBI is clearly not interested in proving anything about 9/11 to the nation or the public.


Who's In Control

So what's going on? Why are the most catastrophic terror attacks in U.S. history uninvestigated and why is the interpretation of the attacks left to the controlled media and politicians? Who has the power to control the media, the government, and the FBI to conceal the truth about what really happened on 9/11?

To understand who is really behind 9/11 requires a comprehensive investigation of the key players who played a role or who controlled the non-investigation and subsequent media-driven "interpretation" of the terror attacks.

Today, five years and three months after 9/11, we are able to look back at the people who have played these key roles. What we find is a small group of people who are linked in a global Zionist network, individuals who are connected by family, ethnic, and business ties to an organized network dedicated to supporting the state of Israel and its agenda.

By exposing the members of this Zionist network and their connection to 9/11 and the so-called "War on Terror," we can identify the chief architects, sub-contractors, and workers who pulled off the false-flag terror attacks of September 11, 2001.


The Architects

Shortly after 9/11, I spoke with Eckehardt Werthebach, the former president of Germany's domestic intelligence service, the Verfassungsschutz. He said that "the deathly precision" and "the magnitude of planning" behind the attacks would have required "years of planning."

Such a sophisticated operation, Werthebach said, would require the "fixed frame" of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a "loose group" of terrorists like the one allegedly led by Mohammed Atta.

Many people would have been involved in the planning of such an operation, Werthebach said. The absence of leaks indicates that the attacks were "state organized actions," he said.

Andreas von Bow, the former German parliamentarian, served on the commission which oversees the three branches of the German secret service from 1969 to 1994. Von Bow told me in the fall of 2001 that he believed that the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad, was behind the 9/11 terror attacks. These attacks, he said, were carried out to turn public opinion against the Arabs and boost military and security spending.

"You don't get the higher echelons," von Bow said, referring to the "architectural structure" which masterminds such terror attacks. At this level, he said, the organization doing the planning, such as Mossad, is primarily interested in affecting public opinion.

In a classic false-flag terror attack, the architectural level planners will use unwitting or corrupt "guns for hire" in order to have the blame assigned to the desired target. The terrorists who actually carry out the crimes are what von Bow calls "the working level," such as the 19 Arabs who allegedly hijacked the planes on Sept. 11. "The working level is part of the deception," he said.

"Ninety-five percent of the work of the intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation," von Bow said. The deception is then widely propagated in the mainstream media creating an accepted version of events.

"Journalists don't even raise the simplest questions," he said. "Those who differ are labeled as crazy."


Years Of Planning

The "years of planning" that Eckehardt Werthebach referred to are obvious to anyone who has read the real history of 9/11. The smaller false-flag terror attacks that preceded the catastrophic terror of 9/11 were meant to instill in the mind of the public the fear of a massive attack in the United States.

The equally suspect and unproven bombings of the federal building in Oklahoma City and the first attack in the World Trade Center were meant to prepare public opinion for "the transforming event" of 9/11.

At the academic level, the architects of 9/11 have been working on U.S. public opinion since the mid-1980s to prepare the political and media elites for a catastrophic terror attack on American soil, and beyond that to focus on how the U.S. should respond to such an attack.

Benjamin Netanyahu, the American-educated hard-line former prime minister of Israel, is probably the most conspicuous architect of terrorism and the so-called "War on Terror." Netanyahu, a Jabotinsky Zionist of the right wing Likud party, published a book in 1986 entitled Terrorism: How the West Can Win in which he laid out precisely the blueprint for what has become the "War on Terror" in Iraq and Afghanistan. Netanyahu's book, and its seriously flawed and racist thesis, has been rewritten, reprinted, and propagated ad nauseam.

Netanyahu's thesis is that Israel is attacked by "terrorists" only because it is "western and democratic," like European nations and the United States. For this reason, Netanyahu says, Americans and Europeans need to join the fight against those who are opposed to the Zionist state of Israel.

In Netanyahu's distorted view of the world, Palestinian grievances and nationalist aspirations have no place or merit. Palestinians and Arabs are simply "terrorists," he says, upon which the West should do battle, as we now do. Reading the controlled press or listening to the pundits on the U.S. mass media, it is clear that they have been the key agents of Zionist propaganda who should be held accountable for having snookered the United States into fighting costly and disastrous wars against Israel's enemies.


Catastrophic Terrorism

There are other agents, many of them highly-placed Americans, who clearly and specifically pushed the agenda, which we call the "War on Terror," as a response to a catastrophic terror attack - long before 9/11.

Three men authored an article in 1998 in Foreign Affairs, the bi-monthly publication of the Council on Foreign Relations, in which they laid out what changes would need to be made within the U.S. government in the wake of "catastrophic terrorism," which is also the title of the article.

The "Catastrophic Terrorism" article, written by Ashton B. Carter, John M. Deutch, and Philip D. Zelikow, appeared in the last issue of Foreign Affairs in 1998. It begins with the strange subtitle "Imagining the Transforming Event," as if what was actually desired by the authors was a transformation of the U.S. government and the way Americans live.

The authors of the article, like Netanyahu, do not even mention the political causes of terrorism. Understanding the causes of terrorism in an effort to prevent it does not even occur to them. No, these three architects are busy "imagining the transforming event" - and how to respond to it.

This article is clearly an architectural level document. It is meant to explain what should be done in the event of the catastrophic terror attack its authors are "imagining." For this reason, the authors deserve to be investigated to see what kind of relationship they might have to those who carried out the false flag terror attacks of 9/11.


Like Pearl Harbor

"Catastrophic terrorism has moved from far-fetched horror to a contingency that could happen next month," the essay warns. "Although the United States still takes conventional terrorism seriouslyit is not yet prepared for the new threat of catastrophic terrorism.

The bombings in East Africa killed hundreds. A successful attack with weapons of mass destruction could certainly take thousands, or tens of thousands, of lives. If the device that exploded in 1993 under the World Trade Center had been nuclear, or had effectively dispersed a deadly pathogen, the resulting horror and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe it.

Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America's fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, this event would divide our past and future into a before and after.

The United States might respond with draconian measures, scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and use of deadly force. More violence could follow, either further terrorist attacks or U.S. counterattacks. Belatedly, Americans would judge their leaders negligent for not addressing terrorism more urgently.

With amazing prescience the authors were right about all eight things they said "might" happen as a result of an attack of "catastrophic terrorism" like Pearl Harbor.

The authors go on to recommend specifically what the U.S. government should do in the wake of such an event of "catastrophic terrorism," which they concluded is "an eminent threat."

The U.S. government should have the authority to monitor any group and its potential state sponsors that might have the motive and the means to use weapons of mass destruction

The United States needs a new institution to gather intelligence on catastrophic terrorism - a National Terrorism Intelligence Center - that would collect and analyze information so it could warn of suspected catastrophic terrorist acts ahead of time

Washington must now work with other countries to extend the prohibitions against development or possession of weapons of mass destruction

International norms should adapt so that states are obliged to reassure other states that are worried and to take reasonable measures to prove they are not secretly developing weapons of mass destruction. Failure to supply such proof or to prosecute the criminals living within their borders should entitle worried nations to take all necessary actions for their self-defense

The United States should aspire as a long-term objective to identify every person and all freight entering the country

The United States should support a system to ensure that every country's passports are computer readable, with every country's passport control station linked to a database

In the same issue of Foreign Affairs in which the prescient essay on "catastrophic terrorism" appeared there is another essay about Usama bin Ladin's "License to Kill" by Bernard Lewis, the British Zionist mastermind of academia. After reading the Lewis article, in which he says Usama bin Ladin calls on Muslims to "kill the Americans and plunder their possessions wherever he finds them and whenever he can" there can be no doubt who should be the prime suspect behind any event of "catastrophic terrorism."

So who are the authors of this prescient article about how the U.S. should respond to an act of "catastrophic terrorism?"


Ashton B. Carter

Ashton B. Carter is a Ford Foundation Professor of Science and International Affairs at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government and a former Assistant Secretary of Defense. The 1998 essay he co-wrote with Deutch and Zelikow was published in a book he wrote with William Perry entitled Preventive Defense: An American Security Strategy for the 21st Century.

Carter is also a member of the Board of Trustees for MITRE, where he was a trustee from 1988 to 1993. The MITRE Corp. is a major defense contracting organization based in Bedford, Massachusetts, which is headed by the former Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), Dr. James Rodney Schlesinger. MITRE's crucial communication, command and control systems clearly failed on 9/11, something that deserves investigating.

See: Is MITRE Corporation the Trojan Horse of 9-11?

From 2001 to 2002, Carter served on the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Science and Technology for Countering Terrorism and advised on the creation of the Department of Homeland Security.

Carter is also a senior partner in a company called Global Technology Partners, LLC (GTP), of which William J. Perry is the chairman. John Mark Deutch, the former Director of Central Intelligence and co-author of the article, is also a senior partner in GTP.


Affiliate Of Rothschild

What is GTP? Global Technology Partners, LLC is "an exclusive affiliate of Rothschild North America, formed to make acquisitions of and investments in technology, defense and aerospace-related companies," according to a biographical sketch of one of the corporation's senior partners, Paul G. Kaminski.

Elsewhere it is described as "an aerospace and defense investment banking boutique affiliated with the Rothschild Group" or "a professional services firm associated with the Rothschild Group of investment banks."

So Ashton B. Carter, John M. Deutch, William J. Perry, and the other fellows at GTP work for and with the Rothschild family, the Jewish financiers of governments and founders of the state of Israel.


John Mark Deutch

This explains how Deutch, who was born in Belgium, and his father, who was born in Russia and who only came to the United States in 1940, were so quickly advanced within the Washington power structure.

Deutch's father, Michael J. Deutch, was born in Smolensk, Russia in 1907. The Deutch family came to the United States in 1940 where Michael quickly became deputy director at the War Production Board, in charge of making synthetic rubber.

A December 27, 1946 article in the Chicago Tribune entitled "List Alien 'Rulers' in U.S." listed some of the foreigners found in a secret 71-page report who had received high government wartime posts. Michael J. Deutch was one of them. Correspondence passing between the Secretary of the Interior and the Office of War Mobilization indicate that Deutch was pushed up the ladder of promotion with unusual vigor by some one," the secret report from the House Committee on Un-American Activities said.

Michael Deutch was a Russian Jew whose family supposedly "fled the Bolshevik Revolution for Belgium." In Belgium, where he studied chemical engineering, he married Rachel Fischer, the daughter of Jean "Yonah" Fischer, a diamond merchant of Antwerp who ran the Zionist Federation of Belgium. This connection could explain why Deutch was promoted so quickly when he came to Washington.

John Deutch's maternal grandfather, Yonah Fischer, was a prominent Zionist and friend of Israel's first president, Chaim Weizmann. Fischer was a very high level Zionist within the international military-political network centered in London. Yonah had extensive business arrangements in Palestine/Israel and even started a town which is named after him - Kefar Yonah.

John Deutch has served as a director of Citigroup and Citibank since 1987. He is also a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).


Philip D. Zelikow

Philip David Zelikow is all over 9/11, its aftermath, and the subsequent wars in the Middle East. Three years after warning of "catastrophic terrorism," Zelikow became the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, the appointed government whitewash which utterly failed to address the key questions and evidence of the terror attacks of 9/11.

Zelikow, from Houston, served on President George W. Bush's transition team in 2001. After Bush took office, Zelikow was named to the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, and served on the National Commission on Federal Election Reform, which produced the extremely flawed Help America Vote Act of 2002.

Zelikow had been a career foreign service officer overseas and served on to the National Security Council. More recently, Zelikow was a member of the Iraq Study Group, which pretended to study what went wrong with the disastrous, illegal, and ill-advised war that Jewish Zionist Neo-Cons, the controlled media, and the Bush administration all pushed so hard for.

Zelikow, the grandson of a Russian Jewish immigrant tailor, is very close to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. He can be seen as having been her legal and Zionist handler. Zelikow joined the National Security Council in the George H.W. Bush administration, at the same time as Condoleezza Rice. Only recently Zelikow resigned as Counselor of the U.S. Department of State, where he served as a senior policy advisor to the Secretary of State.

Ehud Olmert and the criminal gang behind the Likud party in Israel are directly implicated in 9/11 and the subsequent so-called "war on terror."

This is not an opinion - this is what the evidence reveals.

The far right Likud party of Israel grew out of the Zionist terrorist gang known as the IRGUN - a fascist organization created by Vladimir Jabotinsky of Odessa. This is the same terror gang that blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem and committed terrorist acts across Palestine and beyond in the 1930s and 40s.

Terrorism, particularly "false-flag" terror in which the blame for a terror attack is wrongly assigned to the enemy, is a strategy and tactic developed and perfected by the Zionists.

The so-called "war on terror" is also a Zionist construct first articulated by Benjamin Netanyahu in the early 1980s. There was a earlier concept developed in Israel called "TNT" which stood for the Hebrew "Terror Neged Terror" or "terror against terror."

The blueprint for the "war on terror" is found in Netanyahu's 1986 book "Terrorism: How the West Can Win." In his speeches and writings, Netanyahu, whose father was the secretary for Vladimir Jabotinsky, and a leader in his New Zionist Organization, promotes the "war on terror" to be waged against Israel's enemies.

The evidence and the motivation for 9/11 all point to the criminal Likud party and their hard-core Zionist supporters in the United States, Britain, Canada, and Australia.

It should be obvious that people like Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Olmert, Ariel Sharon, and Shimon Peres were involved at the architectural level in the planning of 9/11 in order to bring the United States military into a shooting war in the Middle East.

The same Zionist gangsters who support the Likud also support the Republican Party. Lewis Eisenberg, Ronald Lauder, and Steven L. Friedman are among the U.S. based Zionists that are deeply involved in the attacks of 9/11.

When looking at the terror attacks of 9/11, one should ask more than "Cui bono?" It should also be asked: "Who else?"

Who else could have done it? Who else would want to do it? Who else has any reason to do it?

These Zionist leaders are more than war criminals - they are a threat to all of humanity. They must to be stopped, for our sake and the sake of the peace of the world.

Thank you, Maestro!

You've proved what I knew all along - that it was down to 'Plaid Cymru'......those Basque seperatists just weren't up to it....

maestro: a question -- do you seriously believe that load of old toffee you posted?

Is that the longest post in BB history? Must be in the running.

Fortunately I don't find myself sad enough to have to read it. Phew! ;-))