J.L.---Be honest. Your main reason for recent "obviously unwelcome" changes to the Shares magazine was""ongoing progress"" because you act on feedback etc., from readers and yet, I detect a whole wave of discontent on the comments printed on MoneyAM, these being made by Investors who spend hours,daily, delving for "information etc." My point is, surely they represent the cross-section of readers who would have bought "Shares" and cannot possibly be your"COP-OUT" for the recent poor presentation in response to your claims of reacting to reader feedback!