dclinton
- 10 Mar 2004 09:18
Anyone here holding shares in Celsis? I bought in on a tip sheet recommendation a couple of months ago and it's been a bit lacking.
Was wondering if anyone knew of any reason for the recent sharp fall in price? Nothing on the RNS.
Doug
nathan
- 10 Mar 2004 12:43
- 2 of 7
To my knowledge there is no change in fundamentals.They do,however,report in dollars so the share price seems to be a reflection of the falling exchange rate.
dclinton
- 10 Mar 2004 17:25
- 3 of 7
Interesting. However, the dollar has been rallying back against the pound recently so the move should have been the other way.
petralva
- 26 Apr 2004 17:04
- 4 of 7
http://moneyam.uk-wire.com/cgi-bin/articles/200404261650400156y.html
another aggrement for celsis.
sneaky of them to do it at the end of day.
should be blue tomorrow.
knute
- 27 Oct 2004 08:49
- 5 of 7
A brilliant set of interims. This stock deserves more recognition, imho.
knute
- 10 May 2006 08:54
- 6 of 7
The sp has been about as active as this bb - until yesterday.
Ray A
- 10 Aug 2009 09:11
- 7 of 7
DON'T ACCEPT THE OFFER!
Wait for a better one, see below:
From the F.T on Friday, David Schwartz column:
Last Monday brought news that Celsis, one of my recent trades, was the target of a surprise takeover offer. Ordinarily, announcements of this nature are pleasing. But the Celsis offer brought little joy. The acquirer offered 232.5p per share, a disappointing premium over the previous days closing price
I do not understand why the Celsis board accepted this weak offer. Celsis is a steady profitmaker. Company-sponsored research by Edison suggests its fair value is almost one third above the offer price. Celsis pays no dividend although it can afford to do so. I suspect that a commitment to pay a reasonable dividend could have boosted its share price to a level very close to the offer price, assuming management wished to remain independent.
Another point to consider is that the world economy is at the bottom of a downturn and an expansionary phase approaches. Market statistics suggest a bull market is underway. In this kind of environment, an independent Celsis will probably be worth more in the near future without a takeover premium.
My conclusion is that the acquisition price is too low. I wonder why a major financial institution such as Gartmore accepted such a poor offer so quickly. I contacted Gartmore but no one was available to explain its decision.
The deal is now quite advanced with 38 per cent of the shares already committed. Even so, I am hopeful that uncommitted institutional investors with clout will do the job that the Celsis board should have done and demand a higher price.