for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Agree with the several posts (and Tom Bulford) that SEO should concentrate on getting one really good product to market, i.e. Greenseal - but Starpol is such an intrinsic part of the packaging revolution that I think they can be forgiven for developing this in tandem with GS.

Frogpack will always be a lot smaller, I understand, however they can't exactly put it on hold can they.

sd

A fair point i picked up from another board is, possible litigation against tabacco
firms if was to be proved there was a safer option which had not been
taken up?
cyril

Good news for SEO investors. Concentrate on packaging concepts, it would take millions to get this market and it is not in a consumer friendly market, However you dress it up, smoking kills people directly and in-directly and a starch based filter would be no excuse for dumping more litter.
Could raise a few bob for SEO and SP Metals.

Maybe we should have a poll/competition to try and guess the price that Biotec will get for the Cigarette Filter IP ....

I will kick off with a whopping 75m, just to give you all a chance .... LOL !!!!

Cheers,
PM

I would be interested soon to find out what the current "in-line with expectations" comment actually means. As I said last week the only potential cloud on the horizon for the short-term sp IMO is actual progress versus markets expectation and how that will translate to markets belief of any Starpol deals. Before I re-invest the profits I havn't spent on my family I would still like clarification re:Greenseal progress, a number of machines? 5,10, 50, that is the question and are 200 still anticipated within the first year because whatever way you want to look at it and like it or not SEO sp is currently following 2006 projected EPS with an approx. PE 30-35 even with Starpol/Walmart speculation. Take a look yourselves at forecast revisions & sp trend. I've no doubt Greenseal is and will make progress, its just the speed of it to deliver the profits that the market is now expecting.
Still have chance to re-invest before 20p, has 15p proved to be the support?
What does anyone make of 16-22p opening spreads, whats that all about?

Andy Hi,

"in-line with expectations" .... 200 conversions in the first 12 months ?

200 / 12 = approx. 16 per month ....

If they say they are in-line then that is the rate of take up .... verified by HQ ....

I'm happy with that.

Cheers,
PM

Everything seems to be progressing well for SEO at the moment!

Feeling very confident.

I might even buy some more tomorrow:-)

Another rns another non revenue enhancing day, some things never change; 4p target still stands.

Someuwin Hi,

I might do the same, I paid a couple of grand into the bank today, might spend it tomorrow :)

Cheers,
PM

Paul - I enjoy reading your research, I even enjoy your predictions - which I take with a fair pinch of salt on some - but I dont enjoy you rubbing my nose in how much you earn and how many thousands of shares you got. Spare a thought for us paupers living on our pension - theres a good chap.

Baza

Does anyone else think it strange that this afternoons press release specifically said that starpol/greenseal packaging was "just being introduced into US and british supermarkets"

Has any mention of a US connection been specifically mentioned in a press release before?
I just think it odd everyone's not jumping up and down at that one line in the middle of a broader press release.

Blossie

baza

Take what he says about his earnings and share holdings with a massive dose of salt as well, he's been caught out so often with his lies even he would admit to being a compusive liar.

Mr Sham

I know who I'd rather listen to,Mr Masterson

Peter

Sham - I read everyones comments with interest - even yours and Captain Guides - and apply my own reasoning and logic. That way I can't blame anyone else if the share price takes off or collapses. Paul does at least support his predictions with his assumptions which enables you to make your own decisions.

Baza

Peter

If I predicted 20 per share you'd want to listen to me as well, unfortuantly I stick to truth and fact based price targets, not pie in the sky unachievable feel good one's.

baza

Note he's never answered my question about the market cap being equal to BP if his prediction ever came true, seems even he see's the embarresment behind his claim.

I'll leave you to it today, i'm busy elsewhere.

halfamil
Yes I am still in.
I give up, if most of you like to read Captain Guide's light-hearted rubbish then post it, I will even put it on the Research Page if requested.

Now driver - lets not go overboard - I know you are being playful but lets keep your research page as it is - which is arguably the best source of information and research containing facts not speculation for any new punter.

Baza

morning all. i suppose , at first glance, yesterday's rns is good news. i wouldn't get too excited yet, though, until seo tell us what the "number" is.

Morning all. Been thinking about yesterdays RNS and "as expected" means , to me, the number predicted by SEO previously. If their expectations had changed for the better, then we would have had an RNS or an EVO note to say so. Had their expectations changed for the worse, then no RNS and no mention of the changed expectations this time would surely be in breach of regulations. Therefore I am of the opinion (for what its worth) that 200 conversions is still the expected conversion in the 12 month period and there is nothing to make the board think any differently. This however applies only to the UK. Other countries are another story and that may be the next filip for this share.
Alan

fair point , alan. the problem i have is that nobody apart from seo knows what was "expected". what "as expected " means to seo and what " as expected " means to the market could be poles apart.