bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
niceonecyril
- 03 Oct 2005 21:38
- 10511 of 27111
A fair point i picked up from another board is, possible litigation against tabacco
firms if was to be proved there was a safer option which had not been
taken up?
cyril
andysmith
- 03 Oct 2005 21:39
- 10512 of 27111
Good news for SEO investors. Concentrate on packaging concepts, it would take millions to get this market and it is not in a consumer friendly market, However you dress it up, smoking kills people directly and in-directly and a starch based filter would be no excuse for dumping more litter.
Could raise a few bob for SEO and SP Metals.
paulmasterson1
- 03 Oct 2005 21:57
- 10513 of 27111
Maybe we should have a poll/competition to try and guess the price that Biotec will get for the Cigarette Filter IP ....
I will kick off with a whopping 75m, just to give you all a chance .... LOL !!!!
Cheers,
PM
andysmith
- 03 Oct 2005 22:05
- 10514 of 27111
I would be interested soon to find out what the current "in-line with expectations" comment actually means. As I said last week the only potential cloud on the horizon for the short-term sp IMO is actual progress versus markets expectation and how that will translate to markets belief of any Starpol deals. Before I re-invest the profits I havn't spent on my family I would still like clarification re:Greenseal progress, a number of machines? 5,10, 50, that is the question and are 200 still anticipated within the first year because whatever way you want to look at it and like it or not SEO sp is currently following 2006 projected EPS with an approx. PE 30-35 even with Starpol/Walmart speculation. Take a look yourselves at forecast revisions & sp trend. I've no doubt Greenseal is and will make progress, its just the speed of it to deliver the profits that the market is now expecting.
Still have chance to re-invest before 20p, has 15p proved to be the support?
What does anyone make of 16-22p opening spreads, whats that all about?
paulmasterson1
- 03 Oct 2005 22:25
- 10515 of 27111
Andy Hi,
"in-line with expectations" .... 200 conversions in the first 12 months ?
200 / 12 = approx. 16 per month ....
If they say they are in-line then that is the rate of take up .... verified by HQ ....
I'm happy with that.
Cheers,
PM
someuwin
- 03 Oct 2005 22:33
- 10516 of 27111
Everything seems to be progressing well for SEO at the moment!
Feeling very confident.
I might even buy some more tomorrow:-)
shamona
- 03 Oct 2005 22:35
- 10517 of 27111
Another rns another non revenue enhancing day, some things never change; 4p target still stands.
paulmasterson1
- 03 Oct 2005 22:48
- 10518 of 27111
Someuwin Hi,
I might do the same, I paid a couple of grand into the bank today, might spend it tomorrow :)
Cheers,
PM
bhunt1910
- 03 Oct 2005 22:56
- 10519 of 27111
Paul - I enjoy reading your research, I even enjoy your predictions - which I take with a fair pinch of salt on some - but I dont enjoy you rubbing my nose in how much you earn and how many thousands of shares you got. Spare a thought for us paupers living on our pension - theres a good chap.
Baza
blossiedog
- 03 Oct 2005 22:57
- 10520 of 27111
Does anyone else think it strange that this afternoons press release specifically said that starpol/greenseal packaging was "just being introduced into US and british supermarkets"
Has any mention of a US connection been specifically mentioned in a press release before?
I just think it odd everyone's not jumping up and down at that one line in the middle of a broader press release.
Blossie
shamona
- 03 Oct 2005 23:06
- 10521 of 27111
baza
Take what he says about his earnings and share holdings with a massive dose of salt as well, he's been caught out so often with his lies even he would admit to being a compusive liar.
BKK2
- 04 Oct 2005 07:16
- 10522 of 27111
Mr Sham
I know who I'd rather listen to,Mr Masterson
Peter
bhunt1910
- 04 Oct 2005 07:38
- 10523 of 27111
Sham - I read everyones comments with interest - even yours and Captain Guides - and apply my own reasoning and logic. That way I can't blame anyone else if the share price takes off or collapses. Paul does at least support his predictions with his assumptions which enables you to make your own decisions.
Baza
shamona
- 04 Oct 2005 08:17
- 10524 of 27111
Peter
If I predicted 20 per share you'd want to listen to me as well, unfortuantly I stick to truth and fact based price targets, not pie in the sky unachievable feel good one's.
baza
Note he's never answered my question about the market cap being equal to BP if his prediction ever came true, seems even he see's the embarresment behind his claim.
I'll leave you to it today, i'm busy elsewhere.
bhunt1910
- 04 Oct 2005 08:42
- 10526 of 27111
Now driver - lets not go overboard - I know you are being playful but lets keep your research page as it is - which is arguably the best source of information and research containing facts not speculation for any new punter.
Baza
bosley
- 04 Oct 2005 08:43
- 10527 of 27111
morning all. i suppose , at first glance, yesterday's rns is good news. i wouldn't get too excited yet, though, until seo tell us what the "number" is.
hewittalan6
- 04 Oct 2005 09:01
- 10528 of 27111
Morning all. Been thinking about yesterdays RNS and "as expected" means , to me, the number predicted by SEO previously. If their expectations had changed for the better, then we would have had an RNS or an EVO note to say so. Had their expectations changed for the worse, then no RNS and no mention of the changed expectations this time would surely be in breach of regulations. Therefore I am of the opinion (for what its worth) that 200 conversions is still the expected conversion in the 12 month period and there is nothing to make the board think any differently. This however applies only to the UK. Other countries are another story and that may be the next filip for this share.
Alan
bosley
- 04 Oct 2005 09:13
- 10529 of 27111
fair point , alan. the problem i have is that nobody apart from seo knows what was "expected". what "as expected " means to seo and what " as expected " means to the market could be poles apart.
hewittalan6
- 04 Oct 2005 09:17
- 10530 of 27111
Point taken, Boz, and we will all put our own spin on it. That is what makes this fun. I read it in exactly the same way as you would read a trading update that said profits would be in line with expectations, and that usually refers to market expectations. My concern is about the patent sale. If I were thinking negatively, could I be persuaded that SEO were looking at their cash flow forecasts and seeing trouble ahead, and looking to sell some family silver to ease the issue? I don't think that is the case, but there are still one or two bears not yet hibernating who may wish to portray that.
Alan