for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

I think if you look at the arithmetic, EVO and PM are saying precisely the same thing.

The 12 months exclusive started 1st August - running 3 months to 31st October by when 20 machines will be up and running as per EVO.

Also as per EVO 200 machines will be in place within the 12 months.

Ergo, 180 machines will be installed in the remaininig 9 months.

Dividing 180 by 9 gives you 20 per month.

What's your problem.

Oh btw PM - nobody dared steal your thunder by posting this first, just in case you had nothing to post for a full five minutes. lol

sd

re 10785 no response yet. Can I presume that there are no invested institutions?

stockdog Hi,

Move up to kennel one, your top dog on arithmetic today :)

I wish everyone else had done the sums we did, before 'avin a go :))))

Cheers,
PM

snip, age of reason foundation , if it could be called an institution???
sd, you are doing the same thing as paul. evo "assume" that 20 are going to be in place by 31/10 and state that seo are adamant that it will reach the assumed target of 200 machines.
lorra, lorra assuming going on.

.......

bosley

No need for that!

The oily one

200 machines in year one.

200 x 45,000 fitting = 9,000,000

200 x 25,000 licence = 5,000,000

Profit of 6,000,000 just on the ASDA initial order ?

I can't wait for the USA and Europe rollouts to start, and the end of ASDA exclusivity, and right now SEO is cheap as chips !

Cheers,
PM

PM,

Can you tell me where you get the 45000 fitting?

I thought, perhaps wrongly, that it was 25k to fit the machine of which around 5k was said to be profit to SEO. And then 25k in each of the next 5 years including the year of conversion.

Also, is this profit that you are talking about or purely income?

Cheers,

Q.

EDIT:- Before you think I am having a dig, I am not and I certainly agree that SEO is currently a bargain and as such I know of two people this week that have finally taken the SEO plunge....

I am surprised (or maybe not) that there is no holding by the big institutions. I bought a tiddler this am and 36% is owned by big institutions. Got loads for a few RVD is the share

snip - major shateholders are :
Ranking Shareholder Holding % Date Prev. Holding Prev. %
1 AGE OF REASON FOUNDATION 227,078,122 25.76% 26/04/05 227,078,122 26.91%
2 RICHARDS & APPLEBY LIMITED 53,819,166 6.10% 26/04/05 55,756,666 6.61%
3 FRAMLINGTON INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT 30,000,000 3.40% 26/04/05 54,166,666 6.42%
4 WATERHOUSE SECURITIES 29,718,119 3.37% 26/04/05 23,099,034 2.74%
5 BARCLAYS STOCKBROKERS LIMITED 27,429,948 3.11% 26/04/05 25,696,826 3.04%

Assumr the last 2 to be nominee accounts

Baza

Age of Reason foundation - controlled by trustees related to the directors?

Yes - Ben White, son of Howard White is the primary beneficiary of The Age of Reason Foundation

only two institutional holders!

Masterson strikes again, or perhaps he was predicting the drop;-)

paulmasterson1 - 07 Oct 2005 09:10 - 10754 of 10798

Trading of 2,266,872 bought and only 115,564 sold, so it's only heading one way later :)

Cheers,
PM

Why are the Age of Reason being mentioned again ?

They aren't selling, so whats the problem ?

Cheers,
PM

Paul - I asked a question twice (copy of my second post reprinted below) and you have declined to answer although I see you have made other posts since I asked the question.

I assume from your failure to answer that you do not have any knowledge of what future RNS's will contain, so why have you attempted to mislead us?

You also said the following in another post:-

Mock all you like about RNS's, or even imply I might have been guessing, but these words are from an E-Mail to me 4 weeks ago ....

"I hope that in the next few weeks we will be able to enlighten the market on just how good Biotec is, and how many gems exist in it."

You are implying that you have inside knowledge about future RNSs. Ive tackled you on some of your wild claims in the past as have others, and you were even banned from FYB for making a similar claim. You seem to be getting carried away again.

I think you should retract the statements made in these two posts and apologise - they were at the very least misleading.

I feel this is a serious matter. Your posts could affect some impressionable investors who may believe from what you say that you have access to privileged information from inside Stanelso.



==========
==========

My earlier unanswered post:-

Paul, you haven't answered my question from above - here it is again:-

Paul wrote:-

'If you think the last few RNS's were impressive, wait until you see the next few :)'

Paul,

do you have some specific knowledge of what will be in 'the next few' (if you do I'm not expecting you to divulge the information here)?

You have to allow for a "woman's" "institution".

Life is not as serious as SEO.

Relax a little.

If some of you are as anxious as you appear to write, you would be wiser not to bet on the smaller markets.

Well said Fred

Baza

PM - because BH1910 listed them for someone who wanted to know what institutions hold the shares. I believe it right to point out that shares controlled by or on behalf of directors are not independent investing institutions.

oblo

He only responds to fluffy posts patting him on the back for being such a good googler so he won't respond to you, I have it on good authority this man works in a vegetable packing factory in admin; no big deal but just goes to show the web of deceit and lies his fantasy world revolves around. Buyer beware when taking any info from this chap as if it's not publicly known stuff it's made up.

oblomov Hi,

You say "I assume" .... assume what you like, whinge about me all you like, and post what you like, I won't be baited by you, just like on FYB when you used to post the same baiting questions and accusations

Everyone here knows how much I have got right or wrong so far on Stanelco, and they can make their own decisions, to believe what I say or not.

I am hardly likely to answer your baiting question, which has only two possible answers, either of which would bring another barrage of finger pointing from you :-

1) I have inside info
2) I don't have inside info


I fully expect you to do just like you did with all your other baiting questions on FYB, and make this into another endless saga, be my guest, the power of squelch is upon you yet again ....

Cheers,
PM